Traumas caused by orthodontic treatment: A retrospective review

Author(s):  
George Sam

Even though orthodontic treatment is indispensable for nearly 16-20% of the whole world population with functional efficiency, structural balance and aesthetic harmony as its main advantages and rationale, the treatment particularly with a range of removable, fixed, functional and extraoralorthopaedic appliances can cause various deleterious hard tissue and soft tissue injuries in particular, intraorally. These intraoral and extra oral hard and soft tissue injuries can be iatrogenic, self-induced, caused by bad patient compliance or just by accidents intervened by the patient while wearing the appliance. These traumas/injuries are not uncommon since an orthodontic treatment are mainly done with stainless steel [metal] and the treatment usually continues for a long period of time ranging from 6- 36 months in themajority of the cases. The high pervasiveness of individuals with dental trauma preceding to orthodontic treatment justify the safety measures that should be followed before and during treatment while bearing in mind all the possible effects of orthodontic movement on traumatized teeth. Among the major traumatic dental injuries, avulsion with subsequent tooth reimplantation entails a higher than average risk of complications, such as pulp necrosis, root resorption,and ankyloses. Therefore, it gives orthodontists numerous reasons for apprehension during orthodontic treatment.

1996 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. H. A. Samuels ◽  
F. Willner ◽  
J. Knox ◽  
M. L. Jones

There have been several reports of soft tissue injuries from orthodontic facebows in the dental and medical literature, but the magnitude of the problem in the UK and Eire has been previously investigated. In order to obtain information, questionnaires were distributed to 1682 Dental practitioners providing orthodontic treatment in the UK and Eire. A total of 1117 (66 per cent) replied. Of these 859 (77 per cent) reported using Kloehn type facebows. Thirty-one practitioners (3·6 per cent) gave details of 33 injuries from Kloehn type facebows. The results of this questionnaire are compared and discussed with previous reports in the dental and medical literature. The relative effectiveness of extra-oraltraction safety products is discussed.


1989 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-23
Author(s):  
Michael J. White ◽  
Peter C. Johnson ◽  
Frederick R. Heckler

1997 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 867
Author(s):  
Geon Lee ◽  
Chan Heo ◽  
Yong Jo Kim ◽  
Hyeok Po Kwon ◽  
Jung Hyeok Kwon ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 108-111
Author(s):  
A. A. Makovsky ◽  
◽  
G. V. Fedoruk ◽  
A. P. Stepanchenko ◽  
◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Susta ◽  
Dónal P O'Mathúna ◽  
Michael Parkinson

Author(s):  
Davide Susta ◽  
Dónal P O'Mathúna ◽  
Michael Parkinson

Author(s):  
N Vigneshwari ◽  
Chitra Sivasubramanian ◽  
Nivetha Velmurugan ◽  
Umasankari Vasagaraj ◽  
N. Mohammed Jahith Kani ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document