scholarly journals Comparison study for internal and external modes of fixation for fractures of distal end radius

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ripple Shah ◽  
Suril Shah ◽  
Aalok Shah ◽  
Sharvil Gajjar ◽  
Vijay Chaudhari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
External Fixation ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Point System ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Cast Immobilization ◽  
Intraarticular Fractures ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">Fractures of the distal radius continue to be one of the most common skeletal injuries. The methods which are commonly practiced are closed manipulation and plaster cast, pins and plaster, percutaneous pinning, external fixation and open reduction and internal fixation with or without bone graft. Surgeons are increasingly faced with the dilemma of when to consider operative management and when cast immobilization is the optimal treatment.</span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">47 cases of distal end radius fractures were operated in the orthopedic department of a tertiary care centre. The purpose of the present study was to compare the results of external and internal fixation methods for the treatment of fractures of distal end of radius. Patients operated by external fixation were classified as Group A and those operated by internal fixation were classified as group B. Patients were classified according to AO Classification. Patients were followed at regular intervals depending on the case and time of operation and evaluated by Gartland and Werley score</span>.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">In our study, 29 patients were of extraarticular type, of which 86.20% had an excellent score and 18 patients were of intraarticular type, of which 83.33% had an excellent score. But when compared to groups A and B, the percentage of excellent score obtained in group B was more than that in group A in both extraarticular and intraarticular fractures. Yuan-kun et al did a study on intraarticular distal end radius fractures and evaluated the patients by Gartland and Werley point system, concluding that plating gives better results than external fixation supplemented by K wiring. </span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">We concluded that no method of fixation can be said superior to the other. Each method has fracture-specific indication. The results of open reduction and internal fixation can be better than external fixation in initial months, but in the long run, both the methods can have excellent score, provided the fixation is good and properly indicated.</span></p>

scholarly journals External and internal fixation for comminuted intra-articular fractures of distal radius

1970 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 369-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
RL Pradhan ◽  
S Lakhey ◽  
BK Pandey ◽  
RR Manandhar ◽  
KP Rijal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
External Fixation ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Volar Plating ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Articular Fractures

Background: Distal radius fractures are a common injury and without proper treatment leads to high functional impairment and frequent complications. Objective: The aim of this study was to see the functional outcome in patients with comminuted distal radius fractures treated with combined external fixation and open reduction with volar plating. Materials and methods: All comminuted distal radius fractures classified as type C in AO/OTA classification were enrolled for the study from 2005 till 2008. The clinical scoring chart modified by Cooney was used to evaluate the functional outcome. Results: There were twenty-two patients with the average age of 42.18 years (range 19-60) with 15 male and 7 females. The follow-up period was from 14 to 46 months. Accordingly, there were 11 (50%) excellent, 7 (31%) good, 2 (9%) fair and 2 (9%) poor results. There were very few complications in our series. In three patients additional K-wire supplementation was necessary along with external and open internal fixation. Conclusions: Comminuted intra-articular fractures of distal radius should be treated by open reduction and combined internal and external fixation to achieve a high rate of patient satisfaction and satisfactory functional outcome. Key words: distal radius fractures; volar plating; external fixationDOI: 10.3126/kumj.v7i4.2756 Kathmandu University Medical Journal (2009) Vol.7, No.4 Issue 28, 369-373

scholarly journals Comparison of functional outcome after open and closed reduction of mandibular subcondylar fracture

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Samira Shabbir Balouch ◽  
Rana Sohail ◽  
Sadia Awais ◽  
Riaz Ahmad Warraich ◽  
Mir Ibrahim Sajid
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Closed Reduction ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Mouth Opening ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Subcondylar Fracture ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract Objective: To compare open reduction with internal fixation of mandibular subcondylar fracture with closed reduction in terms of adequate mouth opening. Method: The randomised clinical trial was conducted from March 2014 to February 2015 at the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, King Edward Medical University and Allied Hospitals, Lahore, Pakistan, and comprised patients who presented with unilateral subcondylar fractures. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups. Group-A patients were treated with closed reduction and immobilisation and were discharged the same day, while Group-B patients were treated by open reduction with internal fixation and retained in ward for 1 day. Both were recalled for periodic follow-ups, and were compared in terms of achieving adequate mouth opening. Data was analysed using SPSS 20. Results: Of the 70 patients, 35(50%) were in each of the two groups. The mean age in Group-A was 28.88±11.86 years compared to 28.22±10.80 years in Group-B (p>0.05). Mean mouth opening in  the two groups were consistently positive, and significant at the last two follow-ups(p<0.001). Conclusion: The difference in results of both treatment modalities was significant, indicating that open reduction and internal fixation should be the preferred treatment. Key Words: Mandibular sub-condylar fracture, Open reduction, Closed reduction, Internal fixation, Mouth opening.

scholarly journals Management of surgical site infection post-open reduction and internal fixation for tibial plateau fractures

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 380-387
Author(s):  
Jie Shen ◽  
Dong Sun ◽  
Jingshu Fu ◽  
Shulin Wang ◽  
Xiaohua Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Tibial Plateau ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Induced Membrane ◽  
Membrane Technique ◽  
Induced Membrane Technique ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Aims In contrast to operations performed for other fractures, there is a high incidence rate of surgical site infection (SSI) post-open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) done for tibial plateau fractures (TPFs). This study investigates the effect of induced membrane technique combined with internal fixation for managing SSI in TPF patients who underwent ORIF. Methods From April 2013 to May 2017, 46 consecutive patients with SSI post-ORIF for TPFs were managed in our centre with an induced membrane technique. Of these, 35 patients were included for this study, with data analyzed in a retrospective manner. Results All participants were monitored for a mean of 36 months (24 to 62). None were subjected to amputations. A total of 21 patients underwent two-stage surgeries (Group A), with 14 patients who did not receive second-stage surgery (Group B). Group A did not experience infection recurrence, and no implant or cement spacer loosening was noted in Group B for at least 24 months of follow-up. No significant difference was noted in the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) and the Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score (HSS) between the two groups. The clinical healing time was significantly shorter in Group B (p＜0.001). Those with longer duration of infection had poorer functional status (p＜0.001). Conclusion Management of SSI post-ORIF for TPF with induced membrane technique combined with internal fixation represents a feasible mode of treatment with satisfactory outcomes in terms of infection control and functional recovery. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(7):380–387.

X-ray and Computed Tomography Analysis of Spinal Joint Injuries

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 2959-2964
Author(s):  
Hongyi Zhang ◽  
Haoyu Feng ◽  
Chen Chen ◽  
Li Zhang ◽  
Qiang Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Thoracolumbar Fractures ◽  
Vertebral Height ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Better Than

Objective: The X-ray and CT features of minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screw for open reduction and internal fixation and traditional open reduction and internal fixation for thoracolumbar fractures were compared. Methods: Sixty-two patients with thoracolumbar fractures were analyzed with single vertebral body injury without obvious osteoporosis. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. In group A, minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screws were used for open reduction and fixation. Group B was treated with thoracolumbar vertebral fracture with traditional incision and reduction and internal fixation with posterolateral fusion. Both groups followed standard surgical methods and methods, the same postoperative treatment and functional exercise plan. Results: During a 9-month follow-up, X-ray and computed tomography were used to analyze fracture joint motion injuries. The recovery rate of vertebral height in group A was significantly better than that in group B. At 9 months after operation, the recovery rate of vertebral height in group A increased. The neural function was similar, but the improvement rate in group A was significantly better than that in group B. Conclusions: Minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screws for open reduction and internal fixation are compared with traditional open reduction and internal fixation for thoracolumbar fractures. Vertebral body height, symptom improvement, and neurological recovery after a lumbar fracture. However, minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screws for open reduction and internal fixation can immediately increase the compression stability of the anterior spine and reduce complications such as nail and rod rupture due to excessive fixation pressure.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document