Delayed Facial Nerve Palsy after tympano-mastoid Surgery

2006 ◽  
Vol 120 (9) ◽  
pp. 745-748 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Safdar ◽  
S Gendy ◽  
A Hilal ◽  
P Walshe ◽  
H Burns

Objective: To establish the frequency of occurrence of delayed facial nerve paralysis following tympano-mastoid surgery in our department and to determine the aetiological factors and long term prognosis.Setting: Tertiary care academic centre.Materials and methods: A retrospective review of all patients who had undergone tympano-mastoid surgery in our department over the previous five years was carried out. A total of 219 patients were included in the study. Only two patients were identified as having delayed onset facial nerve palsy over this period of time. The patients' medical records were reviewed and the patients clinically assessed.Results: The frequency of delayed onset facial nerve palsy following tympano-mastoid surgery in our series was 0.91 per cent. Facial weakness set in on day eight and day 14 in the two patients. Serological investigations in both patients revealed raised titres of immunoglobulin (Ig) M and IgG to varicella-zoster virus, confirming the presence of varicella-zoster infection. In our experience, the combined use of prednisone and acyclovir was an effective form of treatment for both patients, whose facial nerve function fully recovered within six months of onset.Conclusion: The incidence of delayed facial nerve palsy following tympano-mastoid surgery is low. It can occur up to two weeks after the surgery. Our two cases confirm viral reactivation to be an important aetiological factor in the development of delayed onset facial nerve palsy. The overall prognosis for delayed facial nerve palsy following tympano-mastoid surgery appears to be good.


2004 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 176-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeoh Thiam Long ◽  
Primuharsa Putra bin Sabir Husin Athar ◽  
Ridzo Mahmud ◽  
Lokman Saim

1996 ◽  
Vol 110 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. J. Wormald

AbstractFacial nerve palsy and hearing impairment are accepted risks of mastoid surgery. However, at present there are no guidelines as to whether a patient must be informed of the potential risk to the facial nerve and hearing during mastoid surgery. Currently the law states that the surgeon should do what a ‘reasonable doctor’ would do under similar circumstances but exactly what this entails is not clear. A recent publication established that 16 per cent of British surgeons did not tell their patients about the risk to the facial nerve and 13 per cent about the risk of hearing loss. A survey of South African surgeons showed a different picture with only 57 per cent of surgeons informing their patients of possible facial nerve injury and 71 per cent about hearing loss. One of the reasons stated was that this information might deter the patient from having a necessary operation. This raises the question of excessive information disclosure and its possible legal consequences if excessive information leads a patient into making an unbalanced judgment owing to his/her lack of medical training, prejudices or personality. In this survey 25 per cent of South African surgeons have had patients refuse surgery after being informed of the risk to facial nerve and hearing. The decision whether to inform the patient about these risks should be individualized for every patient after the surgeon has audited his/her results and assessed the patients prejudices, personality and level of education.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 369-371
Author(s):  
Rajashree U Gandhe . ◽  
Chinmaya P Bhave . ◽  
Avinash S Kakde . ◽  
Neha T Gedam .

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Daichi Fujii ◽  
Hikari Shimoda ◽  
Natsumi Uehara ◽  
Takeshi Fujita ◽  
Masanori Teshima ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii352-iii352
Author(s):  
Dennis Tak-Loi Ku ◽  
Matthew Ming-Kong Shing ◽  
Godfrey Chi-Fung Chan ◽  
Eric Fu ◽  
Ping-Wa Yau ◽  
...  

Abstract INTRODUCTION Infantile glioblastoma is rare with poor prognosis. Recent molecular study for infantile hemispheric high grade glioma found its association with ALK/ROS1/NTRK/MET pathway. This suggested the potential use of targeted therapy for refractory / relapse patients. CASE: A newborn presented with apnea, CT brain showed intracranial haemorrhage. MRI then showed a left parietal tumour with bleeding and mass effect. Craniotomy achieved subtotal resection. Chemotherapy VCR/CPM alternating with CDDP/VP-16 was given for one year. Patient was stable with static residual tumour during chemotherapy. However patient developed status epilepticus two weeks after off treatment. MRI showed significant tumour progression which required 2nd & 3rd debulking surgery. Molecular assay by nanostring panel showed BRAF-KIAA1549 fusion. MEK inhibitor Trametinib was tried for 3 months and stopped as disease progression. Further molecular assay by RNASeq showed presence of ROS1 fusion (ZCCHC8-ROS1) while absent of BRAF fusion. Patient underwent 4th debulking surgery as impending herniation while waiting for the targeted therapy. It was complicated with right hemiplegia and facial nerve palsy postoperatively. Finally, ROS1 inhibitor Entrectinib was started 2 weeks later. It was well tolerated without significant adverse reaction. Patient made dramatic neurological recovery including improved facial nerve palsy, able to walk unaided and self feed. MRI brain 1 and 3 months after Entrectinib showed interval reduction in residual tumour. Patient is currently progression-free for 6 months. CONCLUSION Early molecular study for infantile glioblastoma is useful to guide novel therapy. Molecular result may varies between different panels or change over time, to be interpreted with caution.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document