scholarly journals A non-contiguous recurrence of the ciliary body melanoma—is cataract surgery a risk factor?

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 681-683
Author(s):  
Biljana Kuzmanovic Elabjer
2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irena Tsui ◽  
Robert M Beardsley ◽  
Tara A McCannel ◽  
Scott C Oliver ◽  
Melissa W Chun ◽  
...  

Purpose : To report visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and color vision prior to, 1 year after, 2 years after and 3 years after iodine-125 brachytherapy for choroidal and ciliary body melanoma (CCM). Design : Prospective interventional case series. Participants : Thirty-seven patients (37 eyes) with CCM. Methods : Patients had best-corrected Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity, Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity and Hardy-Rand-Rittler color vision measurement; comprehensive ophthalmology examination; optical coherence tomography; and ultrasonography at baseline prior to, 1 year after, 2 years after and 3 years after I-125 brachytherapy. Main Outcome Measures : Visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and color vision prior to, 1 year after, 2 years after and 3 years after brachytherapy. Results : Nineteen (19) men and 18 women with mean age of 58 years (SD 13, range 30-78) prior to, 1 year after, 2 years after and 3 years after brachytherapy had mean best-corrected visual acuity of 77 letters (20/32), 65 letters (20/50), 56 letters (20/80) and 47 letters (20/125); contrast sensitivity of 30, 26, 22 and 19 letters; color vision of 26, 20, 17 and 14 test figures, respectively. Decrease in visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and color vision was statistically significant from baseline at 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years after brachytherapy. Decreased acuity at 3 years was associated with mid-choroid and macula melanoma location, ≥ 4.1 mm melanoma height, radiation maculopathy and radiation optic neuropathy. Conclusion : 1, 2 and 3 years after brachytherapy, eyes with CCM had significantly decreased visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and color vision.


Author(s):  
Harry H. Brown ◽  
Chris Bergstrom

2012 ◽  
Vol 06 (03) ◽  
pp. 169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Nardi ◽  

Nepafenac ophthalmic suspension is a topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) approved in the US and Europe for prevention and treatment of post-operative pain and inflammation associated with cataract surgery, and recently approved in Europe for reduction in risk of post-operative macular oedema associated with cataract surgery in diabetic patients. Unlike conventional NSAIDs, nepafenac is a prodrug that is uncharged and this results in great corneal permeability. Experimental studies on nepafenac demonstrated enhanced permeability compared with other NSAIDs, and rapid bioactivation to amfenac by intraocular hydrolases within ocular tissues including ciliary body epithelium, retina, choroid and cornea, which results in targeted delivery of active drug to anterior and posterior segments. Furthermore, these study results have been confirmed in clinical trials. Nepafenac may have prolonged activity in vascularised tissues of the eye because bioconversion is targeted to the iris/ciliary body, and to a greater extent the retina and choroid. Nepafenac and amfenac are potent inhibitors of cyclo-oxygenase (COX) enzyme isoforms, COX-1 and COX-2. Topical nepafenac penetrated into the posterior segment in a rabbit model of concanavalin-A induced retinal inflammation, where it diminished vitreous protein and prostaglandin E2concentrations and reduced breakdown of the blood–retinal barrier. Other NSAIDs, including ketorolac, failed to reduce the increase of these inflammatory markers in the same study. A randomised clinical study showed that based on retinal thickening and vision, treatment with nepafenac beginning pre-surgery and used for up to 90 days post-cataract surgery is effective in preventing macular oedema and associated loss of visual acuity in diabetic patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document