scholarly journals Continuous Improvement of the Assessment and Measurement Process for Engineering Education

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
William E. Simon ◽  
Dr. Terrence. L Chambers
2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 239-250
Author(s):  
Guillermo Mejía-Aguilar ◽  
María Mónica Caballero-Márquez ◽  
kevin Huggins ◽  
Lola Xiomara Bautista-Rozo

Accreditation is a contemporary issue in engineering education. There are varying opinions about the opportunities and barriers of this process within the Colombian context. This study compared the advantages and disadvantages of various experiences published in the literature about ABET accreditation. The findings show the ABET accreditation promotes the adoption and implementation of a continuous improvement system and quality culture in engineering education. Additionally, the continuous improvement process aligns the institutional mission, program educational objectives, curricula, and student outcomes. On the contrary, the main concern is the high cost associated with preparing and adapting programs to meet the ABET requirements. Accreditation takes time and effort to be meaningful, which can sometimes lead to increased workloads and time requirements, inadequate training, and lack of faculty commitment. The compilation of experiences with the ABET accreditation process is a significant contribution to engineering programs of public universities in Colombia seeking international accreditation.


Author(s):  
Sally A. Male

Continuous improvement of engineering education is achieved through curriculum development, program evaluation, and program accreditation processes. This chapter is based on the view that one of the criteria for design of these should be alignment with the competencies required by engineers in the workplace. The chapter provides an 11-factor competency model developed in Australia to help achieve this alignment. The model describes the generic engineering competencies required by engineers graduating in Australia. The competencies embed inter-related technical and non-technical components. An advantage of this model over others is the concise and relatively distinct nature of the 11 factors due to the statistical rather than conceptual method of grouping the competencies. The chapter outlines the theoretical framework, the model, and its development. The research methods employed to develop the model include a literature review, a panel session, two large-scale surveys of engineers, and a focus group. Implications for curriculum design, accreditation, and program evaluation are discussed.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Zea Restrepo ◽  
Alejandra Magana ◽  
Juan Lalinde-Pulido ◽  
Alberto Rodriguez ◽  
Natalia Bueno Pizarro

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document