Development of Transient Hypertension- A Rare Complication in a Previously Normotensive Patient Posted for Upper Limb Surgery Following US Guided Brachial Plexus Block

Author(s):  
Mukti Rani ◽  
C. N. Malathi ◽  
N. Ashwini
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-171
Author(s):  
Raluca UNGUREANU ◽  
◽  
Liliana MIREA ◽  
Ioana GRINŢESCU ◽  
Dan TULBURE ◽  
...  

Introduction. The use of ultrasound (US) for brachial plexus block has increased enthusiasm because the anesthesiologist can visualize anatomy, needle placement, and local anesthetic spread during locoregional anesthesia. The objectives of this prospective study was to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of ultrasound guided brachial plexus block comparative with traditional method of neurostimulation. Material and methods. In this randomized controlled clinical trial we included patients over 18 years old with upper limb surgery and who benefit of brachial plexus block (axillary, interscalenic or combined blocks). After monitoring and sedation, the patients randomly received ultrasound-guided (62 pts.) or neuro stimulation (63 pts.) brachial plexus block with ropivacaine 0.5%. We recorded data about: block success rate, sensitive and motor block onset time, block performance time, immediate and late complications events, patient’s satisfaction rate. The results were statistically analyzed, with significance assumed at p<0.05. Results. Block success rate with ultrasound guidance was very high (93.5% in US group and 84% in NS group). The patients of US group received less volume of local anesthetic (20.89 ± 3.9 ml vs. 43 ± 5.1 ml in NS group, p < 0.05). The performance time, needle punctures, sensory and motor onset time was significant reduced in US group. In the NS group we recorded 2 local anesthetic systemic toxicity (minor-moderate neurologic symptoms) with complete recovery and none in US group. We recorded less paresthesia during block performance and vascular puncture due to US guidance (p<0.05). Patient acceptance with locoregional anesthesia is good, even patients experience more discomfort during neurostimulation technique. Conclusions. The results of this study suggest that both techniques of execution of brachial plexus block are adequate for upper limb surgery but US guidance provides significant benefits for patients in terms of efficacy and safety.


1988 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-198
Author(s):  
A. M. THOMPSON ◽  
R. J. NEWMAN ◽  
J. C. SEMPLE

1248 supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks and 665 axillary plexus blocks were administered to 1913 patients undergoing upper limb surgery. Plexus block alone was successful in 83.5%. In a further 11.4% of cases, adequate anaesthesia was obtained following augmentation by other regional or local techniques. This resulted in an overall success rate of 94.9% and general anaesthesia was required in only 5.1%. The two percutaneous approaches to the brachial plexus did not differ in their success-rates but clinically apparent pneumothorax occurred in 0.8% of supraclavicular blocks. Brachial plexus block anaesthesia is recommended as a safe and satisfactory alternative to general anaesthesia for upper limb surgery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document