Background/Aims: Investigate the role of language barriers in cataract surgery outcomes at a county hospital.
Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients who underwent cataract surgery March 2018-February 2019 at Lyndon B. Johnson Hospital. Patients who underwent cataract surgery combined with another procedure or had severe glaucoma or proliferative diabetic retinopathy were excluded. Patients were classified into limited English proficient (LEP) or English proficient (non-LEP) groups based on language preferences. Demographics, baseline ocular characteristics, intraoperative complications, postoperative BCVA (best-corrected visual acuity), complications, and compliance were recorded. The primary outcome was incidence of poor visual outcomes (BCVA<20/40) at the postoperative 1-month visit.
Results: 354 patients (199 [56%] LEP and 155 [44%] non-LEP) with 125 (35%) males and a mean age 66.1 (+/- 10.9) years were included. LEP patients were about 5 years older than non-LEP patients (P<0.001) and were mostly Hispanic (172 [86%] LEP vs. 36 [26%] non-LEP, P<0.001). The baseline ocular characteristics were similar (P >0.05), except severity of cataract (125 [63%] NSC grade >2+ for LEP vs 70 [51%] for non-LEP, P =0.03). No significant differences in intraoperative complications (P =0.18), incidence of poor vision (P =0.59), postoperative cystoid macular edema (P =0.32), and compliance with the postoperative drop regimen (P =0.11) were noted.
Conclusion: There were no statistically significant differences in incidence of poor vision, complications, or compliance. However, there was a trend toward significance, showing that language barriers may lead to more advanced disease and compliance issues with postoperative medications.