Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Preservation of Posterior Structures for Management of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Author(s):  
Tarek Aly

Introduction: Successful posterior lumbar interbody fusion requires excessive removal of posterior spinal elements and distraction of neural structures. It also requires a large amount of bone graft. The authors have developed this technique to assess results of treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis by posterior lumbar interbody fusion with preservation of posterior spinal elements and also to examine the safety and efficacy of the recapping  T-saw laminoplasty technique for the management of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis using posterior lumbar interbody fusion by interbody cages with preservation of posterior elements. Methodology: Twenty-five patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis underwent recapping T-saw laminoplasty in the lumbar spine for posterior lumbar interbody fusion with interbody cage. The T-saw was used for the division of the posterior elements. After discectomy and insertion of cages, the excised lamina was replaced exactly in situ to their original anatomic position. Patients were followed neurologically and radiologically. Result: Only one lamina was excised and replaced again. Primary bone healing was obtained in all patients by four to six months post surgery. No complications such as postoperative spinal canal stenosis, facet arthrosis, or kyphosis were observed. Conclusion: This technique of posterior lumbar interbody fusion through recapping laminoplasty provide wide space for easier insertion of cages and allow anatomic reconstruction of the vertebral arch preserving its important mechanical roles.

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hironobu Sakaura ◽  
Toshitada Miwa ◽  
Tomoya Yamashita ◽  
Yusuke Kuroda ◽  
Tetsuo Ohwada

OBJECTIVEThe cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screw technique is a new nontraditional pedicle screw (PS) insertion method. However, the biomechanical behavior of multilevel CBT screw/rod fixation remains unclear, and surgical outcomes in patients after 2-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) using CBT screw fixation have not been reported. Thus, the purposes of this study were to examine the clinical and radiological outcomes after 2-level PLIF using CBT screw fixation for 2-level degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DS) and to compare these outcomes with those after 2-level PLIF using traditional PS fixation.METHODSThe study included 22 consecutively treated patients who underwent 2-level PLIF with CBT screw fixation for 2-level DS (CBT group, mean follow-up 39 months) and a historical control group of 20 consecutively treated patients who underwent 2-level PLIF using traditional PS fixation for 2-level DS (PS group, mean follow-up 35 months). Clinical symptoms were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring system. Bony union was assessed by dynamic plain radiographs and CT images. Surgery-related complications, including symptomatic adjacent-segment disease (ASD), were examined.RESULTSThe mean operative duration and intraoperative blood loss were 192 minutes and 495 ml in the CBT group and 218 minutes and 612 ml in the PS group, respectively (p < 0.05 and p > 0.05, respectively). The mean JOA score improved significantly from 12.3 points before surgery to 21.1 points (mean recovery rate 54.4%) at the latest follow-up in the CBT group and from 12.8 points before surgery to 20.4 points (mean recovery rate 51.8%) at the latest follow-up in the PS group (p > 0.05). Solid bony union was achieved at 90.9% of segments in the CBT group and 95.0% of segments in the PS group (p > 0.05). Symptomatic ASD developed in 2 patients in the CBT group (9.1%) and 4 patients in the PS group (20.0%, p > 0.05).CONCLUSIONSTwo-level PLIF with CBT screw fixation for 2-level DS could be less invasive and result in improvement of clinical symptoms equal to those of 2-level PLIF using traditional PS fixation. The incidence of symptomatic ASD and the rate of bony union were lower in the CBT group than in the PS group, although these differences were not significant.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document