scholarly journals Comparison between Functional Outcome of Intertrochanteric Fractures treated with Trochanteric Fixation Nail versus short Proximal Femoral Nail

2016 ◽  
Vol 04 (11) ◽  
pp. 13652-13658
Author(s):  
Dr Anandsrinivas A. Sowlee ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Femoral Nail ◽  
Trochanteric Fixation Nail

scholarly journals A study to assess proximal femoral nailing versus dynamic hip screw device in surgical management of intertrochanteric fractures: a comparative study

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
E. S. Radhe Shyam ◽  
K. Ashwin
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fracture ◽  
Trochanteric Fracture ◽  
Dynamic Hip Screw ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail ◽  
Technical Failure ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Femoral Nail ◽  
Fracture Management ◽  
Hip Screw

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> The incidence of inter trochanteric fracture is expected to have doubled by 2040. Inter trochanteric fractures account for about 45% to 50% of all hip fractures in the elderly populationand out of these, near about 50% to 60% are classified as unstable intertrochanteric fractures. The goal of treatment is restoring mobility safely and efficiently, while minimizing the risk of medical complications and technical failure. This study as performed<strong> </strong>to assess functional outcome with dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail in intertrochanteric fracture management.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> It was prospective observational study done for a period of 1year from January 2016-January 2017 among patients who attended OPD or emergency department with intertrochanteric fracture. Two different implants were used dynamic hip screw (DHS) and proximal femoral nail (PFN).<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Excellent results in functional outcome was more in case of PFN (66.6%) compared to DHS (50%). The type of trauma in DHS group was road traffic accident in 38.8%, domestic fall in 50% and others such as assault was in 11.1% while in PFN group intertrochanteric fracture was seen in 61.1% due to domestic fall.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> The functional outcome was more better with proximal femoral nail (PFN) compared to dynamic hip screw (DHS). Therefore, proximal femoral nail (PFN) should be preferred for management of intertrochanteric fractures.</p>

Dynamic Hip Screw versus Proximal Femoral Nail in the Management of Intertrochanteric Fractures - A Retrospective Analysis from Rajasthan

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (26) ◽  
pp. 2271-2277
Author(s):  
Gajanand Shriram Dhaked ◽  
Abhishek Komalsingh Jaroli ◽  
Khushboo Parmanand Malav ◽  
Harish Narayan Singh Rajpurohit
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Dynamic Hip Screw ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail ◽  
Final Decision ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Femoral Nail ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Hip Screw

BACKGROUND Current management of Intertrochanteric (IT) fractures has evolved with the introduction of dynamic hip screw (DHS) and proximal femoral nail (PFN). The purpose of this study was to compare the functional outcomes between the DHS and PFN for IT fracture fixation. METHODS This study is a retrospective comparative analysis of 455 patients with IT fractures; DHS (292) and PFN (163), who were treated from June 2012 to June 2015. The patients were reviewed postoperatively for a minimum of 12 months to evaluate functional outcome using Salvati-Wilson score. Categorical data was present as absolute number or percentages, and parametric variables were presented as Mean ± SD, while non parametric data were presented as median. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05. RESULTS Intramedullary nails offer no advantage over extramedullary devices to treat IT fractures caused by low-energy trauma (AO 31 - A1). However, clinically significant outcomes were established for PFN group in terms of duration of surgery, x- ray exposure and SW Score for AO / OTA 31 - A2 and 31 - A3. Reoperations encountered for local pain due to implant prominence were significantly higher in the PFN group (4.90 % versus 1.02 %). Kaplan Meier survival probability of 69.3 % and 79.5 % predicted for DHS and PFN respectively, 3 years postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS Our conclusion reinforces indication for PFN in unstable IT fractures (31 - A2 and 31 - A3), owing to its better functional outcome and biomechanical properties. Functional outcomes for stable IT fracture (AO 31 - A1) were comparable between DHS and PFN, therefore final decision for implant choice depends on implant cost, surgeon’s preference for specific technique. However, understanding the morphology of proximal femur, peritrochanteric region is crucial to analyse the anatomical variations in Indian population which will provide the basis for intramedullary nail design modifications. KEYWORDS Intertrochanteric Fractures, DHS Fixation, PFN Fixation

scholarly journals Evaluation of clinical results and complications of internal fixation of intertrochanteric femur fracture with proximal femoral nail antirotation

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manish Raj ◽  
S. P. S. Gill ◽  
Akashdeep Singh ◽  
Ajay Kumar Rajput ◽  
Santosh Kumar Singh
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Varus Deformity ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Significant Treatment ◽  
Femur Fractures ◽  
Femoral Nail ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the theoretical advantages of the proximal femoral nail antirotation in cases of intertrochanteric fractures and also whether it actually alters the eventual functional outcome of the patient.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> The present study includes a total 30 patients with intertrochanteric femur fractures managed with proximal femoral nail antirotation between December 2014 to November 2016. In all patients similar standard physical rehabilitation therapy were followed. All complications including intra and postoperative were assessed and recorded. The patients were followed up for over 24 months. Functional outcome was assessed using the Harris hip score.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> All of 30 cases of intertrochanteric fracture got united with good anatomical position and average time of fracture union was 14 weeks. Postoperative complications included 2 degree varus deformity (n=1, 3%), calcification at tip of greater trochanter (n=4, 13%), sensitivity over TFL (n=2, 7%), medial thigh pain (n=3, 10%). 10 patients developed femoral shortness (mean=0.22 cm, range from 0-1 cm). Average harris hip score at the end of study showed mean value of 87, ranged from 65 to 94 with almost 22 (73%) patients showing excellent or good outcome.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) represents a significant treatment option in management of intertrochanteric fractures with low complication rate.</p>

scholarly journals Functional outcome of unstable intertrochanteric fractures managed with proximal femoral nail: a prospective analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 945
Author(s):  
C. Joney Mandice ◽  
Raship Khan ◽  
Heber Anandan
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Femur Fractures ◽  
Efficient Management ◽  
Femoral Nail ◽  
Early Return ◽  
Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Hip fractures are a growing concern for the orthopedic surgeons all over the world because the incidence of hip fractures is increasing dramatically and these fractures impose a significant challenge in their efficient management. The aim of the study was to prospectively analyze the functional outcome of unstable intertrochanteric fractures managed with ‘proximal femoral nail’.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> In our institution, we have selected 24 cases of unstable intertrochanteric fractures for this prospective study. All cases enrolled were managed with the proximal femoral nail. These cases were studied from the mechanism of injury, classification, and treatment with the proximal femoral nail and their surgical and functional outcome with or without residual comp.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Patients were followed up for an average period of 8.58 months. The mean Harris hip score was 88.75 at 6th month. The score was excellent in 12 patients, good in 10 patients, fair in 1 patient and poor in 1 patient. In our study of 24 patients with unstable intertrochanteric fracture, the average age incidence was 54.64 years. In the present study male: female was 5:3.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> In unstable proximal femur fractures, PFN is a significant advancement in the treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures which has the unique advantages of closed reduction, preservation of fracture hematoma, less tissue damage, early rehabilitation and early return to work.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document