scholarly journals Proceedings of the AMCP Integrated Care Summit: Population Health and Quality Improvement in Anaphylaxis

2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (1 Supp A) ◽  
pp. S1-S9 ◽  
Author(s):  
2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 255-257
Author(s):  
Bettina M. Beech ◽  
Keith C. Norris ◽  
Marino A. Bruce

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Sonia Burch Piñol ◽  
Olga Lozano ◽  
Jordi Mendieta ◽  
Alba Barbero ◽  
Ana M Roig ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 04 (12) ◽  
pp. 887-896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha Okafor ◽  
Victor Ede ◽  
Rosemary Kinuthia ◽  
Debbie Strotz ◽  
Cathryn Marchman ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 425-430
Author(s):  
Ahmed Otokiti

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide insights into contemporary challenges associated with applying informatics and big data to healthcare quality improvement. Design/methodology/approach This paper is a narrative literature review. Findings Informatics serve as a bridge between big data and its applications, which include artificial intelligence, predictive analytics and point-of-care clinical decision making. Healthcare investment returns, measured by overall population health, healthcare operation efficiency and quality, are currently considered to be suboptimal. The challenges posed by informatics/big data span a wide spectrum from individual patients to government/regulatory agencies and healthcare providers. Practical implications The paper utilizes informatics and big data to improve population health and healthcare quality improvement. Originality/value Informatics and big data utilization have the potential to improve population health and service quality. This paper discusses the challenges posed by these methods as the author strives to achieve the aims.


Tehnika ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 147-151
Author(s):  
Bojana Knežević ◽  
Valentina Marinković

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 80
Author(s):  
G. Ross Baker ◽  
Deborah Cohen ◽  
Elina Farmanova-Haynes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hajira Dambha-Miller ◽  
Glenn Simpson ◽  
Lucy Hobson ◽  
Paul Roderick ◽  
Paul Little ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: As the prevalence of older adults with multimorbidity increases, greater integration of services is necessary to manage the range of physical and social needs of the population. The aim of this study is to describe and summarise current evidence, clinical provision and progress towards integrated primary care and social services for older adults with multimorbidity in an English context. Methods: A scoping review was conducted which included a systematic electronic search of Medline, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Science and Social Science Citation Indices and Opengrey from data inception until the 16th June 2020. Articles were screened and extracted in duplicate by two independent reviewers. Data were extracted onto a charting sheet and thematic synthesis used to summarise findings.Results: Our search yielded 7656 papers of which 84 papers were included. Three themes were identified: (1) diverse focus on individual level services rather than multi-level or multi-sector integration, with an increasing emphasis on the need to consider broader determinants of population health as critical to integrated care in multimorbidity; (2) time was needed for integration to embed to allow new structures and relationships to develop and mature; and (3) we identified inherent tension between top-down and bottom-up driven approaches to integrated care that requires a whole-systems structure while allowing for local flexibilities.Conclusions: There is limited evidence of multi-level and multi-sector integration of services for older adults with multimorbidity in an English context. The literature increasingly acknowledges wider determinants of population health that are likely to require integration beyond primary care and social services. Improving clinical care in one or two sectors may not be as effective as simultaneously improving the organisation or design across services as one single system of provision. This may take time to establish and will require local input.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hajira Dambha-Miller ◽  
Glenn Simpson ◽  
Lucy Hobson ◽  
Paul Roderick ◽  
Paul Little ◽  
...  

Abstract Background As the prevalence of older adults with multimorbidity increases, greater integration of services is necessary to manage the physical and psycho-social needs of this cohort. This study describes and summarises current evidence, clinical provision and progress towards integrated primary care and social services for older adults with multimorbidity in England. Methods A scoping review was conducted involving systematic searches of a range of electronic academic and policy databases. Articles were screened and extracted in duplicate by two independent reviewers. Data were extracted onto a charting sheet and thematic synthesis was used to summarise findings. Articles were included if published in English and related to primary care, social care and multimorbidity in older adults in England. Conceptually, the review was framed using the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care. Results The search yielded 7656 articles of which 84 were included. Three themes were identified: (1) a focus on individual level services rather than multi-level or multi-sector integration, with an increasing emphasis on the need to consider broader determinants of population health as critical to integrated care for older adults with multimorbidity; (2) the need for policymakers to allow time for integration to embed, to enable new structures and relationships to develop and mature; and (3) the inherent tension between top-down and bottom-up driven approaches to integrated care requires a whole-systems structure, while allowing for local flexibilities. Conclusions There is limited evidence of multi-level and multi-sector integration of services for older adults with multimorbidity in England. The literature increasingly acknowledges wider determinants of population health that are likely to require integration beyond primary care and social services. Improving clinical care in one or two sectors may not be as effective as simultaneously improving the organisation or design across services as one single system of provision. This may take time to establish and will require local input.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document