General Trauma and Burns

Author(s):  
Sasha D. Adams ◽  
Nori L. Bradley ◽  
Amy R. Alger
Keyword(s):  
2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jang Whan Jo ◽  
Jun Min Cho ◽  
Nam Ryeol Kim

Author(s):  
Shanthi Ameratunga ◽  
Jacqueline Ramke ◽  
Nicki Jackson ◽  
Sandar Tin Tin ◽  
Belinda Gabbe

2011 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deanne Armstrong ◽  
Jane Shakespeare-Finch

The field of bereavement and grief has been expanding to recognise the potential for growth following the loss of a loved one. This study sought to examine the effect of the relationship to the deceased and perceptions of the severity of the trauma on dimensions of posttraumatic growth. Participants were 146 people who had lost either: a) a first degree relative, b) a second degree relative, or c) a non-related friend. Results demonstrated that both severity and the relationship to the bereaved differentiate posttraumatic growth outcomes. For example, participants who had lost a first degree relative reported higher levels of growth than those who had lost a second degree relative. Consistent with previous research in general trauma populations, the more severe the loss was rated, the higher the levels of growth. Implications for practice are discussed.


2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 323-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheri K. Walker ◽  
Elizabeth A. Sandmann ◽  
Taylor J. Horyna ◽  
Mark A. Gales

Objective: To review the evidence regarding increased enoxaparin dosing for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in the general trauma patient population. Data Sources: A search of MEDLINE databases (1946 to October 2016) was conducted using the search terms enoxaparin, thromboembolism prophylaxis, venous thromboembolism, trauma, anti-factor Xa, and weight-based dosing. Additional references were identified from a review of literature citations. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Search results were limited to English-language studies conducted in humans. Trials that included only obese patients or nontrauma patients were excluded. Data Synthesis: A total of 7 trials (958 patients) explored the use of increased dosing of enoxaparin for VTE prophylaxis in trauma patients. Patients were divided by enoxaparin dosing strategies: standard dosing of 30 mg twice daily (BID; n = 509), higher initial dosing regimen (n = 216), or dosing based on anti-FXa level adjustments (n = 233). The majority of the 42 total VTE events (64.3%) occurred in the standard dosing regimen. Within each group, VTE was reported in 5.3% of patients in the standard dosing group, 3.2% in the higher initial dosing group, and 4% in the anti-FXa adjustment group. Initial subtherapeutic anti-FXa levels occurred in 33% to 92% of standard dose patients and 9% to 39% of higher initial dose patients. The average weight-based dose required to achieve a therapeutic level ranged between 0.43 and 0.54 mg/kg/dose BID. The overall rate of bleeding was low, with 3 incidents (0.37%) reported. Conclusion: Standard-dose enoxaparin prophylaxis may not be optimal for the general trauma patient population. Weight-based enoxaparin dosing (0.5 mg/kg/dose BID) is an option in trauma patients considered to be at a lower risk of bleeding complications.


2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 389-397
Author(s):  
Megan Petrie ◽  
Douglas Zatzick

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Suk ◽  
Monica Daigl ◽  
Richard E. Buckley ◽  
Cleber A. J. Paccola ◽  
Dean G. Lorich ◽  
...  

Background. In orthopedics, there is no instrument specifically designed to assess patients’ expectations of their final surgery outcome in general trauma populations. We developed the Trauma Expectation Factor Trauma Outcome Measure (TEFTOM) to investigate the fulfilment of patients’ expectations one year after surgery as a measure of general trauma surgical outcomes. The aim of this paper was to assess the psychometric characteristics of this new general trauma outcome measure. Methods. The questionnaire was tested in 201 ankle and distal tibia fracture patients scheduled for surgery. Patients were followed up for twelve months. The TEFTOM questionnaire was evaluated for its criterion validity, internal consistency, reproducibility, and responsiveness. Results. TOM showed good criterion validity against the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Foot and Ankle Scale (Pearson’s correlation coefficient = 0.69–0.77). Internal consistency was acceptable for TEF (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.65–0.76) and excellent for TOM (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.76–0.85). Reproducibility was moderate to very good (intraclass coefficient correlation (ICC) ≥0.67) for TEF and very good (ICC ≥0.92) for TOM. TOM also proved to be responsive to changes in patients’ condition over time (Wald test; P<0.001). Conclusions. TEFTOM is a promising tool for measuring general trauma outcomes in terms of patients’ expectation fulfilment that proved to be valid, internally consistent, reproducible, and responsive to change.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document