scholarly journals An Engineering Learning Community To Promote Retention And Graduation Of At-Risk Engineering Students

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth G. Ricks ◽  
James A. Richardson ◽  
Harold P. Stern ◽  
Robert P. Taylor ◽  
Ryan A. Taylor

Retention and graduation rates for engineering disciplines are significantly lower than desired, and research literature offers many possible causes. Engineering learning communities provide the opportunity to study relationships among specific causes and to develop and evaluate activities designed to lessen their impact. This paper details an engineering learning community created to combat three common threats to academic success of engineering students: financial difficulties, math deficiencies, and the lack of a supportive engineering culture. The project tracks participants in the learning community from first year through graduation to assess the effectiveness of its activities in improving retention and graduation rates. Scholarships were made available to address the financial difficulties; tutors, mentors, study groups, and a “freshman-to-sophomore bridge” summer program were provided to address math deficiencies; cohort engineering courses, active learning techniques, required group meetings, required group study sessions, dedicated study space, and dedicated faculty advisors were used to promote a sense of community. Quantitative retention and graduation rates for the cohort are compared to other engineering groups at the same institution. Qualitative results collected via student surveys and interviews, and lessons learned by project administrators are also presented. Retention and graduation rates of the cohort are better than those of comparable groups at the same institution. Graduation rates based upon freshman math placement are also higher than comparable groups. 

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annita Alting ◽  
Joseph Barba ◽  
Margaret Krudysz ◽  
Ardie Walser

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacqueline Hodge ◽  
Magdalini Lagoudas ◽  
Angie Harris ◽  
Jefferey Froyd ◽  
Margaret Hobson ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa Dagley ◽  
Michael Georgiopoulos ◽  
Amber Reece ◽  
Cynthia Young

Author(s):  
Alan Perks ◽  
Rozalina Dimitrova

The Capstone process helps prepare Civil Engineering students for a rapidly evolving practice now facing many urgent social, economic and environmental pressures. Recent experience in identifying suitable capstone projects and working effectively with industry collaborators and student teams will be discussed. The project portfolios will be reviewed, and the approach to recruiting and retaining collaborators, working with faculty advisors, and supporting student teams will be summarized. Lessons learned from all these perspectives provided important adjustments to the uOttawa approach, which in past semesters has succeeded in providing all students in as many as to 25 teams in a semester with an industry collaborator and a valuable opportunity to enhance their skills in communications, planning, creative engineering solutions, and interdisciplinary teamwork.  


2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 91
Author(s):  
Alfonsa García López ◽  
Francisco García Mazarío

This work describes a formative assessment model for the Mathematical Analysis course taken by engineering students. It includes online questionnaires with feedback, a portfolio with weekly assignments, exams involving the use of mathematical software and a project to be completed in small groups of two or three students. The model has been perfected since 2009, and during the 2014-15 academic year the creation of a pilot online learning community was added. Based on Google+, it has been used for a peer assessment experiment involving student projects, among other uses. 


Author(s):  
Alfredo Federico Serpell ◽  
Ximena Ferrada ◽  
Larissa Rubio

Abstract The function of project risk management (PRM) is to understand the uncertainty that surrounds a project and to identify the potential threats than can affect it as well as to know how to handle these risks in an appropriate way. Then, the measurement of the performance of PRM becomes an important concern, an issue that has not yet been addressed in the research literature. It is necessary to know how successful the application of the PRM process is and how capable is the process within the organization. Regarding construction projects, it is essential to know whether the selected responses to mitigate or eliminate identified risks were suitable and well implemented after the execution of the project. This paper presents a critical analysis of the relevance of measuring the performance of PRM and the benefits of doing so. Additionally, it presents a preliminary and pioneering methodology to measure the performance of PRM through the evaluation of the adequacy of responses applied to mitigate risks as well as to evaluate the resulting impacts as indicators of the effectiveness of these actions at the end of the project. This knowledge will allow construction companies to incorporate good practices, generate lessons learned, and thereby to promote a continuous improvement of the whole PRM process.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document