scholarly journals Las dificultades prácticas de la determinación del tribunal competente en el proceso monitorio europeo = Practical difficulties in determining the competent court of the European order for payment procedure

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 615
Author(s):  
Ana Isabel Blanco García
Keyword(s):  
International Jurisdiction ◽  
General Ground

Resumen: La STJUE de 10 de marzo de 2016, Flight Refund Ltd. vs. Deutsche Lufthansa AG, versa sobre el procedimiento a seguir cuando se ha formulado oposición contra un requerimiento europeo de pago expedido por un órgano o autoridad de un Estado miembro, en este caso, Hungría, cuyos tribunales no son competentes para conocer de la reclamación formulada en el requerimiento, siendo que el Reglamento (CE) nº 1896/2006 no establece criterio de competencia para tales supuestos. En esta sentencia, el Tribunal de Justicia trata de determinar, de forma algo confusa, las facultades del tribunal encargado de designar el órgano jurisdiccional competente para conocer del proceso contencioso derivado de la oposición al requerimiento de pago.Palabras clave: Proceso monitorio europeo, Reglamento (CE) nº 1896/2006, oposición del demandado al requerimiento europeo de pago, competencia internacional.Abstract: CJEU´s decision on the 10th of March 2016, Case Flight Refund Ltd. vs. Deutsche Lufthansa AG analyses the contentious proceeding after the presentation of the statement of opposition to an European order for payment issued by an organ or authority without international jurisdiction (in this case, the Hungarian Courts), taking into consideration that the Regulation (EC) nº 1896/2006 does not establish the general ground of jurisdiction. The CJEU´s decision deals, in a confusing manner, with the power of the competent Court to issue the contentious proceedings arising from the defendant´s opposition to the European order for payment.Keywords: European order for payment procedure, Regulation (EC) nº 1896/2006, defendant´s opposition to the European order for payment, international judicial competence

JURISDIÇÃO INTERNACIONAL E O PAPEL DA CORTE INTERAMERICANA DE DIREITOS HUMANOSINTERNATIONAL JURISDICTION AND THE ROLE OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (15) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Cláudio Martins de Araújo ◽  
Victoria Gonçalves Rebello
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
International Jurisdiction

A Convenção Americana, um verdadeiro código latino-americano de Direitos Humanos, foi incorporado por 25 Estados no continente — expressando, no que tange às garantias legais de direitos dos homens, a força de uma consonância de princípios a serem seguidos na região. Ao denunciar sérias violações aos direitos humanos, e exercer pressões sobre os Estados, a Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos tem feito prodigiosas contribuições para o acesso à justiça no continente americano, quando as instituições nacionais se mostram omissas ou limitadas. Nesse diapasão, propõe-se analisar mais detalhadamente o contexto que permitiu o surgimento desta Corte regional, assim como traçar um perfil qualitativa de sua atuação no Continente.

Jurisdiction and Cognate Matters

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hayk Kupelyants
Keyword(s):  
Sovereign Debt ◽  
English Court ◽  
Debt Restructuring ◽  
International Jurisdiction ◽  
Class Actions ◽  
Brussels Regulation

Chapter 3 examines the international jurisdiction in sovereign debt disputes and particularly the following matters: service of proceedings; the jurisdiction under the Brussels Regulation, the jurisdiction under English national rules; individual standing of beneficial bondholders; class actions. The chapter also examines the issue of pre-emptive strikes in sovereign debt litigation, in other words whether private creditors may initiate legal actions before the conclusion of the sovereign debt restructuring and how courts may constrain such litigation. The chapter argues that the English courts may stay proceedings if they are brought in contravention of the powers of bondholders under majority action clauses. The chapter lastly addresses the issue of whether the majority may modify the bonds after the English court has issued a judgment.

scholarly journals Commission 9: Instrumentation and Techniques: (Instrumentation et Techniques)

2000 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 316-327
Author(s):  
Ian S. McLean ◽  
Ding-Qiang Su ◽  
Thomas Armstrong ◽  
Noah Brosch ◽  
Martin Cullum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adaptive Optics ◽  
Global Networks ◽  
General Ground ◽  
International Collaborations ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Robotic Telescopes ◽  
New Instruments ◽  
Innovative Techniques ◽  
Full Operation

The last triennium, and coincidentally the last few years of the 20th century, has been a most remarkable time for Commission 9, and for astronomy in general. Ground-based astronomy in particular has received an enormous boost due to the arrival of an astonishing array of new telescopes, novel instruments and innovative techniques. For those of us closely involved in developing new observatories, instrumentation or detectors, the last few years have been rather hectic! As an astronomer with a long-time interest in the development of new instruments, what amazes me is the breadth of technology and the visionary scope of all these incredible new achievements. Many of the very large 8-10 meter class telescopes are now coming into full operation – yet, just as this is happening, numerous smaller “survey” telescopes are providing a wealth of new sources. Adaptive optics is being practiced at many sites and diffraction-limited imaging from the ground is now a reality. Several optical-IR interferometers are now working and more are coming along very soon. Detectors continue to get bigger and better, especially for the infrared, and instrumentation is increasingly more sophisticated, complex and efficient. Remote observing, robotic telescopes and global networks of telescopes are common, and international collaborations are larger and stronger than ever before.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document