scholarly journals Upper bounds for inverse domination in graphs

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Elliot Krop ◽  
◽  
Jessica McDonald ◽  
Gregory J. Puleo ◽  
◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir Samodivkin

AbstractThe k-restricted domination number of a graph G is the minimum number d k such that for any subset U of k vertices of G, there is a dominating set in G including U and having at most d k vertices. Some new upper bounds in terms of order and degrees for this number are found.


Mathematics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abel Cabrera Martínez ◽  
Suitberto Cabrera García ◽  
Andrés Carrión García

Let G be a graph without isolated vertices. A function f : V ( G ) → { 0 , 1 , 2 } is a total Roman dominating function on G if every vertex v ∈ V ( G ) for which f ( v ) = 0 is adjacent to at least one vertex u ∈ V ( G ) such that f ( u ) = 2 , and if the subgraph induced by the set { v ∈ V ( G ) : f ( v ) ≥ 1 } has no isolated vertices. The total Roman domination number of G, denoted γ t R ( G ) , is the minimum weight ω ( f ) = ∑ v ∈ V ( G ) f ( v ) among all total Roman dominating functions f on G. In this article we obtain new tight lower and upper bounds for γ t R ( G ) which improve the well-known bounds 2 γ ( G ) ≤ γ t R ( G ) ≤ 3 γ ( G ) , where γ ( G ) represents the classical domination number. In addition, we characterize the graphs that achieve equality in the previous lower bound and we give necessary conditions for the graphs which satisfy the equality in the upper bound above.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (06) ◽  
pp. 2050076 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manal N. Al-Harere ◽  
Ahmed A. Omran ◽  
Athraa T. Breesam

In this paper, a new definition of graph domination called “Captive Domination” is introduced. The proper subset of the vertices of a graph [Formula: see text] is a captive dominating set if it is a total dominating set and each vertex in this set dominates at least one vertex which doesn’t belong to the dominating set. The inverse captive domination is also introduced. The lower and upper bounds for the number of edges of the graph are presented by using the captive domination number. Moreover, the lower and upper bounds for the captive domination number are found by using the number of vertices. The condition when the total domination and captive domination number are equal to two is discussed and obtained results. The captive domination in complement graphs is discussed. Finally, the captive dominating set of paths and cycles are determined.


2013 ◽  
Vol 161 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 604-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrei Gagarin ◽  
Anush Poghosyan ◽  
Vadim Zverovich

2016 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-239
Author(s):  
Nader Jafari Rad ◽  
Lutz Volkmann
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (7) ◽  
pp. 301-305
Author(s):  
Dr. B. Basavanagoud Dr. B. Basavanagoud ◽  
◽  
Vijay V Teli
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 03 (05) ◽  
pp. 784-790 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.H. Muddebihal .
Keyword(s):  

1997 ◽  
Vol 84 (1) ◽  
pp. 176-178
Author(s):  
Frank O'Brien

The author's population density index ( PDI) model is extended to three-dimensional distributions. A derived formula is presented that allows for the calculation of the lower and upper bounds of density in three-dimensional space for any finite lattice.


Author(s):  
M. Valliammal ◽  
S. P. Subbiah ◽  
V. Swaminathan
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document