scholarly journals Further Results on the Total Roman Domination in Graphs

Mathematics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abel Cabrera Martínez ◽  
Suitberto Cabrera García ◽  
Andrés Carrión García
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bound ◽  
Necessary Conditions ◽  
Minimum Weight ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Upper Bounds ◽  
Lower And Upper Bounds ◽  
Roman Domination ◽  
Roman Domination Number ◽  
Roman Dominating Function ◽  
Domination In Graphs

Let G be a graph without isolated vertices. A function f : V ( G ) → { 0 , 1 , 2 } is a total Roman dominating function on G if every vertex v ∈ V ( G ) for which f ( v ) = 0 is adjacent to at least one vertex u ∈ V ( G ) such that f ( u ) = 2 , and if the subgraph induced by the set { v ∈ V ( G ) : f ( v ) ≥ 1 } has no isolated vertices. The total Roman domination number of G, denoted γ t R ( G ) , is the minimum weight ω ( f ) = ∑ v ∈ V ( G ) f ( v ) among all total Roman dominating functions f on G. In this article we obtain new tight lower and upper bounds for γ t R ( G ) which improve the well-known bounds 2 γ ( G ) ≤ γ t R ( G ) ≤ 3 γ ( G ) , where γ ( G ) represents the classical domination number. In addition, we characterize the graphs that achieve equality in the previous lower bound and we give necessary conditions for the graphs which satisfy the equality in the upper bound above.

scholarly journals Roman domination in direct product graphs and rooted product graphs

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (10) ◽  
pp. 11084-11096
Author(s):  
Abel Cabrera Martínez ◽  
◽  
Iztok Peterin ◽  
Ismael G. Yero ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Direct Product ◽  
Minimum Weight ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Upper Bounds ◽  
Lower And Upper Bounds ◽  
Roman Domination ◽  
Roman Domination Number ◽  
Product Graphs ◽  
Vertex Set ◽  
Roman Dominating Function

<abstract><p>Let $ G $ be a graph with vertex set $ V(G) $. A function $ f:V(G)\rightarrow \{0, 1, 2\} $ is a Roman dominating function on $ G $ if every vertex $ v\in V(G) $ for which $ f(v) = 0 $ is adjacent to at least one vertex $ u\in V(G) $ such that $ f(u) = 2 $. The Roman domination number of $ G $ is the minimum weight $ \omega(f) = \sum_{x\in V(G)}f(x) $ among all Roman dominating functions $ f $ on $ G $. In this article we study the Roman domination number of direct product graphs and rooted product graphs. Specifically, we give several tight lower and upper bounds for the Roman domination number of direct product graphs involving some parameters of the factors, which include the domination, (total) Roman domination, and packing numbers among others. On the other hand, we prove that the Roman domination number of rooted product graphs can attain only three possible values, which depend on the order, the domination number, and the Roman domination number of the factors in the product. In addition, theoretical characterizations of the classes of rooted product graphs achieving each of these three possible values are given.</p></abstract>

Resolving Roman domination in graphs

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Roushini Leely Pushpam ◽  
B. Mahavir ◽  
M. Kamalam
Keyword(s):  
Minimum Weight ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Roman Domination ◽  
Roman Domination Number ◽  
Roman Dominating Function ◽  
Domination In Graphs ◽  
Dominating Function

Let [Formula: see text] be a graph and [Formula: see text] be a Roman dominating function defined on [Formula: see text]. Let [Formula: see text] be some ordering of the vertices of [Formula: see text]. For any [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] is defined by [Formula: see text]. If for all [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], we have [Formula: see text], that is [Formula: see text], for some [Formula: see text], then [Formula: see text] is called a resolving Roman dominating function (RDF) on [Formula: see text]. The weight of a resolving RDF [Formula: see text] on [Formula: see text] is [Formula: see text]. The minimum weight of a resolving RDF on [Formula: see text] is called the resolving Roman domination number of [Formula: see text] and is denoted by [Formula: see text]. A resolving RDF on [Formula: see text] with weight [Formula: see text] is called a [Formula: see text]-function on [Formula: see text]. In this paper, we find the resolving Roman domination number of certain well-known classes of graphs. We also categorize the class of graphs whose resolving Roman domination number equals their order.

Critical concept for double Roman domination in graphs

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (02) ◽  
pp. 2050020
Author(s):  
S. Nazari-Moghaddam ◽  
L. Volkmann
Keyword(s):  
Minimum Weight ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Roman Domination ◽  
Critical Graphs ◽  
Roman Domination Number ◽  
Double Roman Domination ◽  
Number Formula ◽  
Roman Dominating Function ◽  
Domination In Graphs ◽  
Dominating Function

A double Roman dominating function (DRDF) on a graph [Formula: see text] is a function [Formula: see text] such that (i) every vertex [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text] is adjacent to at least two vertices assigned a [Formula: see text] or to at least one vertex assigned a [Formula: see text] and (ii) every vertex [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text] is adjacent to at least one vertex [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text] The weight of a DRDF is the sum of its function values over all vertices. The double Roman domination number [Formula: see text] equals the minimum weight of a DRDF on [Formula: see text] The concept of criticality with respect to various operations on graphs has been studied for several domination parameters. In this paper, we study the concept of criticality for double Roman domination in graphs. In addition, we characterize double Roman domination edge super critical graphs and we will give several characterizations for double Roman domination vertex (edge) critical graphs.

scholarly journals Some progress on the mixed Roman domination in graphs

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hossein Abdollahzadeh Ahangar ◽  
Jafar Amjadi ◽  
Mustapha Chellali ◽  
S. Kosari ◽  
Vladimir Samodivkin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimum Weight ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Upper And Lower Bounds ◽  
Roman Domination ◽  
Roman Domination Number ◽  
Vertex Set ◽  
Roman Dominating Function ◽  
Np Complete ◽  
Domination In Graphs ◽  
Dominating Function

Let $G=(V,E)$ be a simple graph with vertex set $V$ and edge set $E$. A mixed Roman dominating function (MRDF) of $G$ is a function $f:V\cup E\rightarrow \{0,1,2\}$ satisfying the condition that every element $x\in V\cup E$ for which $f(x)=0$ is adjacent or incident to at least one element $% y\in V\cup E$ for which $f(y)=2$. The weight of a mixed Roman dominating function $f$ is $\omega (f)=\sum_{x\in V\cup E}f(x)$. The mixed Roman domination number $\gamma _{R}^{\ast }(G)$ of $G$ is the minimum weight of a mixed Roman dominating function of $G$. We first show that the problem of computing $\gamma _{R}^{\ast }(G)$ is NP-complete for bipartite graphs and then we present upper and lower bounds on the mixed Roman domination number, some of them are for the class of trees.

Roman domination in graphs: The class ℛUV R

2016 ◽  
Vol 08 (03) ◽  
pp. 1650049 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir Samodivkin
Keyword(s):  
Minimum Weight ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Sufficient Conditions ◽  
Roman Domination ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Roman Domination Number ◽  
Number Formula ◽  
Roman Dominating Function ◽  
Necessary And Sufficient ◽  
Domination In Graphs

For a graph [Formula: see text], a Roman dominating function (RDF) [Formula: see text] has the property that every vertex [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text] has a neighbor [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text]. The weight of a RDF [Formula: see text] is the sum [Formula: see text], and the minimum weight of a RDF on [Formula: see text] is the Roman domination number [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text]. The Roman bondage number [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] is the minimum cardinality of all sets [Formula: see text] for which [Formula: see text]. A graph [Formula: see text] is in the class [Formula: see text] if the Roman domination number remains unchanged when a vertex is deleted. In this paper, we obtain tight upper bounds for [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] provided a graph [Formula: see text] is in [Formula: see text]. We present necessary and sufficient conditions for a tree to be in the class [Formula: see text]. We give a constructive characterization of [Formula: see text]-trees using labelings.

scholarly journals Lower bounds on the Roman and independent Roman domination numbers

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustapha Chellali ◽  
Teresa Haynes ◽  
Stephen Hedetniemi
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bound ◽  
Lower Bounds ◽  
Minimum Weight ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Roman Domination ◽  
Roman Domination Number ◽  
Roman Dominating Function ◽  
Independent Domination ◽  
Dominating Function ◽  
Domination Numbers

A Roman dominating function (RDF) on a graph G is a function f : V (G) ? {0,1,2} satisfying the condition that every vertex u with f(u) = 0 is adjacent to at least one vertex v of G for which f(v) = 2. The weight of a Roman dominating function is the sum f(V) = ?v?V f(v), and the minimum weight of a Roman dominating function f is the Roman domination number ?R(G). An RDF f is called an independent Roman dominating function (IRDF) if the set of vertices assigned positive values under f is independent. The independent Roman domination number iR(G) is the minimum weight of an IRDF on G. We show that for every nontrivial connected graph G with maximum degree ?, ?R(G)? ?+1/??(G) and iR(G) ? i(G) + ?(G)/?, where ?(G) and i(G) are, respectively, the domination and independent domination numbers of G. Moreover, we characterize the connected graphs attaining each lower bound. We give an additional lower bound for ?R(G) and compare our two new bounds on ?R(G) with some known lower bounds.

Isolate Roman domination in graphs

2021 ◽  
pp. 2150131
Author(s):  
Davood Bakhshesh
Keyword(s):  
Minimum Weight ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Chordal Graphs ◽  
Roman Domination ◽  
Roman Domination Number ◽  
Vertex Set ◽  
Roman Dominating Function ◽  
Np Complete ◽  
Domination In Graphs ◽  
Dominating Function

Let [Formula: see text] be a graph with the vertex set [Formula: see text]. A function [Formula: see text] is called a Roman dominating function of [Formula: see text], if every vertex [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text] is adjacent to at least one vertex [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text]. The weight of a Roman dominating function [Formula: see text] is equal to [Formula: see text]. The minimum weight of a Roman dominating function of [Formula: see text] is called the Roman domination number of [Formula: see text], denoted by [Formula: see text]. In this paper, we initiate the study of a variant of Roman dominating functions. A function [Formula: see text] is called an isolate Roman dominating function of [Formula: see text], if [Formula: see text] is a Roman dominating function and there is a vertex [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text] which is not adjacent to any vertex [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text]. The minimum weight of an isolate Roman dominating function of [Formula: see text] is called the isolate Roman domination number of [Formula: see text], denoted by [Formula: see text]. We present some upper bound on the isolate Roman domination number of a graph [Formula: see text] in terms of its Roman domination number and its domination number. Moreover, we present some classes of graphs [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text]. Finally, we show that the decision problem associated with the isolate Roman dominating functions is NP-complete for bipartite graphs and chordal graphs.

scholarly journals Vertex-Edge Roman Domination

2021 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 685-698
Author(s):  
H. NARESH KUMAR ◽  
◽  
Y. B. VENKATAKRISHNAN
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bound ◽  
Minimum Weight ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Bipartite Graphs ◽  
Roman Domination ◽  
Roman Domination Number ◽  
Roman Dominating Function ◽  
Np Complete ◽  
Dominating Function

A vertex-edge Roman dominating function (or just ve-RDF) of a graph G = (V,E) is a function f : V (G) →{0, 1, 2} such that for each edge e = uv either max{f(u),f(v)}≠0 or there exists a vertex w such that either wu ∈ E or wv ∈ E and f(w) = 2. The weight of a ve-RDF is the sum of its function values over all vertices. The vertex-edge Roman domination number of a graph G, denoted by γveR(G), is the minimum weight of a ve-RDF G. In this paper, we initiate a study of vertex-edge Roman dominaton. We first show that determining the number γveR(G) is NP-complete even for bipartite graphs. Then we show that if T is a tree different from a star with order n, l leaves and s support vertices, then γveR(T) ≥ (n − l − s + 3)∕2, and we characterize the trees attaining this lower bound. Finally, we provide a characterization of all trees with γveR(T) = 2γ′(T), where γ′(T) is the edge domination number of T.

scholarly journals Roman Domination of Some Chemical Graphs

2021 ◽  
pp. 556-562
Author(s):  
Pallavi Sangolli ◽  
Manjula C. Gudgeri ◽  
. Varsha ◽  
Shailaja S. Shirkol
Keyword(s):  
Minimum Weight ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Wiener Index ◽  
Roman Domination ◽  
Zagreb Index ◽  
Dna Structures ◽  
Roman Domination Number ◽  
Roman Dominating Function ◽  
Domination In Graphs ◽  
Dominating Function

The concept of Domination in graphs has application to the study of DNA structures. For investigating the chemical and physical properties, several topological indices used are Wiener index, Randic index, Zagreb index, Kier & Hall index that depends on vertex degree and distance sum, and have been used extensively for QSAR and QSPR studies. A Roman Dominating Function of G is function f: V→ {0, 1, 2} such that every vertex v for which f (v) = 0 has a neighbor u with f(u) = 2. The weight of a Roman dominating function f is w (f) =   . The Roman domination number of a graph G is denoted by (G) and is the minimum weight of all possible Roman dominating functions. In this paper, we find Roman domination number of some chemicals graphs such as saturated hydrocarbons and unsaturated hydrocarbons, hexagonal chain, pyrene, Hexabenzocoronene, H-Phenylenic nanotube and N-Napthelenic nanotube.

INVERSE ROMAN DOMINATION IN GRAPHS

2013 ◽  
Vol 05 (03) ◽  
pp. 1350011
Author(s):  
M. KAMAL KUMAR ◽  
L. SUDERSHAN REDDY
Keyword(s):  
Roman Empire ◽  
Minimum Weight ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Roman Domination ◽  
Roman Domination Number ◽  
Roman Dominating Function ◽  
Domination In Graphs ◽  
Dominating Function ◽  
Scientific American

Motivated by the article in Scientific American [7], Michael A Henning and Stephen T Hedetniemi explored the strategy of defending the Roman Empire. Cockayne defined Roman dominating function (RDF) on a Graph G = (V, E) to be a function f : V → {0, 1, 2} satisfying the condition that every vertex u for which f(u) = 0 is adjacent to at least one vertex v for which f(v) = 2. For a real valued function f : V → R the weight of f is w(f) = ∑v∈V f(v). The Roman domination number (RDN) denoted by γR(G) is the minimum weight among all RDF in G. If V – D contains a roman dominating function f1 : V → {0, 1, 2}. "D" is the set of vertices v for which f(v) > 0. Then f1 is called Inverse Roman Dominating function (IRDF) on a graph G w.r.t. f. The inverse roman domination number (IRDN) denoted by [Formula: see text] is the minimum weight among all IRDF in G. In this paper we find few results of IRDN.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document