scholarly journals Inhomogeneous Poisson Point Process for Species Distribution Models: Relative Performance of Methods Accounting for Sampling Bias and Imperfect Detection

Author(s):  
Yannick MUGUMAARHAHAMA ◽  
Adandé Belarmain FANDOHAN ◽  
Arsene Ciza MUSHAGALUSA ◽  
Idelphonse Akoeugnigan SODE ◽  
Romain GLELE KAKAÏ

Species distribution models have become tools of great importance in ecology since the advanced knowledge of suitable habitat of species is needed in the process of the world's biodiversity conservation. Models that use presence-only data are of great interests and are widely used in ecology due to their easy access. However, these models do not estimate accurately the true spatial species distribution based solely on presence-only data since they do not account for biases induced by the sampling techniques used and imperfect detection. To address this gap, Hierarchical integrated models have been recently introduced. Through this study, we assessed the relative performance of these new SDMs models using simulated data. The performance of the models was tested by comparing the estimates of parameters of the distribution models they provide with parameters used to simulate the distribution of the virtual species. The best model was the one whose estimates were close to the true distribution parameters of the virtual species. Results showed that analyzing Presence-only data in conjunction with Point-counts data through the Dorazio's Hierarchical model produced estimates of the coecients of the species intensity models with high precision and less bias while the Koshkina integrated model showed poor performance. Site-occupancy data, being not informative of species abundance, did not allow reducing biases in Presence-only data. The Dorazio's Hierarchical model produced estimates with high precision even with low detection probability. We have also found that the species rarity tends to in ate the variability of the models' estimates making modelling abundant species to be more accurate than modelling less abundant species. Hence, to model the species distribution with high precision based on Presence-only data, additional Point-counts data are required to account for sampling bias and imperfect detection.

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 420-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vira Koshkina ◽  
Yan Wang ◽  
Ascelin Gordon ◽  
Robert M. Dorazio ◽  
Matt White ◽  
...  

Ecology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 100 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathias W. Tobler ◽  
Marc Kéry ◽  
Francis K. C. Hui ◽  
Gurutzeta Guillera‐Arroita ◽  
Peter Knaus ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 55 ◽  
pp. 101015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Osamu Komori ◽  
Shinto Eguchi ◽  
Yusuke Saigusa ◽  
Buntarou Kusumoto ◽  
Yasuhiro Kubota

2012 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 305-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadia Bystriakova ◽  
Mykyta Peregrym ◽  
Roy H.J. Erkens ◽  
Olesya Bezsmertna ◽  
Harald Schneider

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Conor Waldock ◽  
Rick D. Stuart-Smith ◽  
Camille Albouy ◽  
William W. L. Cheung ◽  
Graham J. Edgar ◽  
...  

The contributions of species to ecosystem functions or services depend not only on their presence in a given community, but also on their local abundance. Progress in predictive spatial modelling has largely focused on species occurrence, rather than abundance. As such, limited guidance exists on the most reliable methods to explain and predict spatial variation in abundance. We analysed the performance of 68 abundance-based species distribution models fitted to 800,000 standardised abundance records for more than 800 terrestrial bird and reef fish species. We found high heterogeneity in performance of abundance-based models. While many models performed poorly, a subset of models consistently reconstructed range-wide abundance patterns. The best predictions were obtained using random forests for frequently encountered and abundant species, and for predictions within the same environmental domain as model calibration. Extending predictions of species abundance outside of the environmental conditions used in model training generated poor predictions. Thus, interpolation of abundances between observations can help improve understanding of spatial abundance patterns, but extrapolated predictions of abundance, e.g. under climate change, have a much greater uncertainty. Our synthesis provides a roadmap for modelling abundance patterns, a key property of species' distributions that underpins theoretical and applied questions in ecology and conservation.


2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Rota ◽  
Robert Fletcher ◽  
Jason Evans ◽  
Richard Hutto

Ecography ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 659-670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher T. Rota ◽  
Robert J. Fletcher ◽  
Jason M. Evans ◽  
Richard L. Hutto

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document