scholarly journals Modern Solutions for the Reconstruction of Gas Exhaust Ducts of Converters Operating in Ukraine

Author(s):  
Olexander Yefimov ◽  
Valerii Kavertsev ◽  
Oleksandr Zhidetskyi

Nowadays most of the installed gas cleaning equipment of oxygen converters of metallurgical plants performs cleaning out of emissions of solid particles with final concentrations higher than acceptable. The inconsistency of the efficiency of the BOF-gas purification with the new emission standards entails the rejection of the emission permit and as a consequences the shutdown of metallurgical plants as well as the loss of the sales markets. In order to prevent the shutdown of the main shops of the metallurgical plants with the simultaneous implementation of appropriate environmental protection measures, it is important to launch the reconstruction of all gas-cleaning units of the converter exhaust ducts. The first element of the BOF-gas cooling and purification system is the BOF-gas cooler, its equipment is in close connection with the process equipment, thus the technological mode of steel production fully depends on its operating mode. The article describes the options of modernization of the exhaust duct of HRSG installed in the BOF-gas cleaning system. Besides, two options of BOF-gas cleaning system presented. In addition, two options of HRSG design: the old one and modernized – were compared.

2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Peregrina ◽  
J. M. Audic ◽  
P. Dauthuille

Assimilate sludge to a fuel is not new. Sludge incineration and Combined Heat and Power (CHP) engines powered with sludge-derived anaerobic digestion gas (ADG) are operations widely used. However, they have a room of improvement to reach simultaneously a positive net power generation and a significant level of waste reduction and stabilization. Gasification has been used in other realms for the conversion of any negative-value carbon-based materials, that would otherwise be disposed as waste, to a gaseous product with a usable heating value for power generation . In fact, the produced gas, the so-called synthetic gas (or syngas), could be suitable for combined heat and power motors. Within this framework gasification could be seen as an optimum alternative for the sludge management that would allow the highest waste reduction yield (similar to incineration) with a high power generation. Although gasification remains a promising route for sewage sludge valorisation, campaigns of measurements show that is not a simple operation and there are still several technical issues to resolve before that gasification was considered to be fully applied in the sludge management. Fluidised bed was chosen by certain technology developers because it is an easy and well known process for solid combustion, and very suitable for non-conventional fuels. However, our tests showed a poor reliable process for gasification of sludge giving a low quality gas production with a significant amount of tars to be treated. The cleaning system that was proposed shows a very limited removal performance and difficulties to be operated. Within the sizes of more common WWTP, an alternative solution to the fluidised bed reactor would be the downdraft bed gasifier that was also audited. Most relevant data of this audit suggest that the technology is more adapted to the idea of sludge gasification presented in the beginning of this paper where a maximum waste reduction is achieved with a great electricity generation thanks to the use of a “good” quality syngas in a CHP engine. Audit show also that there is still some work to do in order to push sludge gasification to a more industrial stage. Regardless what solution would be preferred, the resulting gasification system would involve a more complex scenario compared to Anaerobic Digestion and Incineration, characterised by a thermal dryer and gasifier with a complete gas cleaning system. At the end, economics, reliability and mass and energy yields should be carefully analysed in order to set the place that gasification would play in the forthcoming processing of sewage sludge.


1996 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 383-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jürgen Gottschalk ◽  
Peter Buttmann ◽  
Torgny Johansson

1985 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 1267-1270
Author(s):  
A. A. Andrizhievskii ◽  
A. A. Mikhalevich ◽  
A. G. Trifonov

2011 ◽  
Vol 47 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 369-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Yu. Valdberg ◽  
Yu. V. Kovalevskii ◽  
K. P. Makeeva

2015 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 324-331
Author(s):  
Takashi Inui ◽  
Masaya Tabaru ◽  
Yukio Aoki ◽  
Akinori Zukeran

2019 ◽  
Vol 239 ◽  
pp. 117979
Author(s):  
Yuying Du ◽  
Li Li ◽  
Qifei Huang ◽  
Dahai Yan ◽  
Xuebing Li ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document