scholarly journals Distal Tibial Osteotomy without Fibular Osteotomy for Medial Ankle Arthritis with Mortise Widening

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. e9
Author(s):  
Tae-Keun Ahn ◽  
Young Yi ◽  
Jae-Ho Cho ◽  
Woo-Chun Lee
2021 ◽  
pp. 107110072110357
Author(s):  
Jun Young Choi ◽  
Jin Ho Cho ◽  
Tae Hun Song ◽  
Jin Soo Suh

Background: We aimed to determine whether the location of tibial osteotomy affects the outcome during low tibial osteotomy (LTO) with fibular osteotomy for varus ankle arthritis by comparing proximal syndesmotic (PS) and distal syndesmotic (DS) tibial osteotomy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the radiographic findings of 50 cases (among 47 patients) who underwent LTO with fibular osteotomy for varus ankle arthritis. The enrolled patients were divided into 2 groups according to the location of the tibial osteotomy: the PS group (25 cases, 24 patients) and the DS group (25 cases, 23 patients). Radiographic parameters were compared between the 2 groups. Results: There were no significant differences in tibial anterior and lateral surface angles, tibiomedial malleolar angle, talar center migration, and intermalleolar distance correction between the 2 groups (all P > .05). However, the decreases in talar tilt (TT) and talocrural angle (TCA) were more pronounced in the DS group than in the PS group (both P < .05). Among patients with TT ≥8 degrees, a greater decrease in TT (+1.0 degrees vs –2.8 degrees) and TCA was observed in the DS group, whereas the PS group demonstrated greater increases in TCA and intermalleolar distance (all P < .01). Conclusion: In this series, DS tibial osteotomy combined with fibular osteotomy was a more effective operative option than PS tibial osteotomy to correct both extra- and intra-articular deformity for varus ankle arthritis. Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.


1999 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. D. Georgoulis ◽  
Charalampos A. Makris ◽  
Christos D. Papageorgiou ◽  
U. G. Moebius ◽  
Theodoros Xenakis ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (9) ◽  
pp. 1001-1007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhao Hongmou ◽  
Liang Xiaojun ◽  
Li Yi ◽  
Liu Hongliang ◽  
Wang Junhu ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 284-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.S. Hefzy ◽  
S.R. Saddemi ◽  
G. Cheng ◽  
M. Hoeflinger ◽  
C. Milem ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 121 (6) ◽  
pp. 355-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y.-M. Cheng ◽  
Peng-Ju Huang ◽  
Shau-Hong Hong ◽  
Sen-Yuen Lin ◽  
Chao-Chiu Liao ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koji Nozaka ◽  
Naohisa Miyakoshi ◽  
Takeshi Kashiwagura ◽  
Yuji Kasukawa ◽  
Hidetomo Saito ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Advanced to end-stage ankle osteoarthritis in highly active older individuals has traditionally been treated using tibiotalar arthrodesis. With tibiotalar arthrodesis, high levels of pain-free function are possible; however, there is a loss of ankle joint movement and a risk of future arthrosis in the adjacent joints. Distraction arthroplasty is a simple method that allows joint cartilage repair; however, the results are currently mixed, with some reports showing improved pain scores and others showing no improvement. Distal tibial osteotomy (DTO) without fibular osteotomy, a type of joint preservation surgery, has garnered attention in recent years. However, to our knowledge, there are no reports on DTO with joint distraction using a circular external fixator. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the effect of DTO with joint distraction using a circular external fixator on ankle osteoarthritis. Methods: A total of 21 patients with medial ankle arthritis were examined. Arthroscopic synovectomy and a microfracture procedure were performed. Subsequently, angled osteotomy and correction of the distal tibia were performed. After ankle conditions improved, stabilization of the ankle joint was performed. An external fixator was used in all patients. In addition, joint distraction of about 5.8 mm was performed. All patients were allowed full weight-bearing walking immediately after surgery. Results: The anteroposterior mortise angle during weight-bearing, lateral mortise angle during weight-bearing, and talar tilt angle and anterior translation of the talus on ankle stress radiography significantly improved (P < 0.05). In addition, signal changes on magnetic resonance imaging improved in all patients. Visual analogue scale and American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society scores also improved significantly (P < 0.05). No severe complications were observed. Conclusion: DTO with joint distraction may be useful for older patients with a high physical activity level as a joint-preserving surgery for medial ankle osteoarthritis. Level of evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series Key words : distal tibial osteotomy, medial ankle arthritis, joint distraction, circular external fixator


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document