Do We Need Extensor Retinacular Enhancement on Broström Lateral Ankle Repair? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Aims This meta-analysis compared inferior extensor retinaculum (IER) enhancement in Broström-Gould procedure and anatomical Broström repair. We aim to evaluate functional ankle score (American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, Karlsson score), talar tilt, talar anterior translation, and complications between both groups. Methods A comprehensive systematic literature search was carried out using Wiley Library, Scopus, Pubmed, ScienceDirect, and EuropePMC databases from inception up until 19 December 2020. While the intervention was IER enhancement, the control was those without IER enhancement. The primary outcome was the functional ankle score (AOFAS and Karlsson score). The secondary outcomes were talar tilt, talar anterior translation, and other complications. Results There was a total of 298 patients from 7 studies included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. IER enhancement was associated with lower AOFAS (mean difference -1.115 [-2.197, -0.033], p=0.043; I2: 0%) during follow-up. Lower Karlsson score was observed in the IER enhancement group (mean difference -2.004 [-3.442, -0.567], p=0.006; I2: 3.71%) during follow-up. Talar tilt (mean difference -0.145 degree [-0.436, 0.146], p=0.329; I2: 0%) and anterior displacement (mean difference -0.109 mm [-0.096, 0.314], p=0.299; I2: 0%) in the two groups were similar on follow-up. The complications were similar in both groups (OR 0.87 [0.40, 1.89], p=0.719; I2: 0%). Meta-regression analysis indicates that the association between IER and AOFAS was not affected by age (p=0.927) and male gender (p=0.930). Conclusion This meta-analysis showed that ATFL repair with non-IER enhancement was non-inferior compared to those with IER enhancement.

Fibular osteotomy is helpful for talar reduction in the treatment of varus ankle osteoarthritis with supramalleolar osteotomy

Background There have been debates on the necessity of fibular osteotomy (FO) in supramalleolar osteotomy (SMOT) for the treatment of varus ankle osteoarthritis. The purpose of the current study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between SMOT with and without FO in the treatment of varus ankle osteoarthritis. Methods The SMOT group included 39 patients, and the SMOT with FO group included 24 patients. The basic information reached no significant difference between groups. The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS), modified Takakura stage and range of motion (ROM) were used for the functional evaluation. The radiologic parameters were assessed at the last follow-up to compare the degree of talar reduction between the two groups. Results Both groups achieved significant improvements in AOFAS scores, modified Takakura stage, as well as AOS pain and functional scores (P < 0.001). The ROM of the ankle joint in the SMOT group was significantly decreased (P = 0.022). In both groups, all of the radiological parameters were significantly improved (P < 0.01). The tibiofibular clear space (TFCS) was significantly widened in the SMOT group (P < 0.001). No significant difference was found between the two groups according to the functional outcomes. However, the talar tilt angle (TT) and hindfoot alignment angle (HFA) in the SMOT with FO group were significantly smaller than those in the SMOT group (P < 0.05). The TFCS was significantly widened in the SMOT group (P = 0.001). The medial displacement of the talus (MDT) was better reduced in the SMOT with FO group (P = 0.006). Conclusion SMOT is a promising procedure for functional improvement and malalignment correction in varus ankle osteoarthritis but reduces ankle range of motion. If SMOT is combined with FO, talar tilt and medial displacement will be better reduced.

Relationship between talofibular impingement and increased talar tilt in incongruent varus ankle osteoarthritis

Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between talofibular impingement and increased talar tilt in incongruent varus ankle osteoarthritis. Methods: Incongruent varus ankle osteoarthritis was defined as a talar tilt of more than 4° on standard ankle anteroposterior radiographs. We retrospectively reviewed 30 patients with unilateral incongruent varus ankle osteoarthritis with normal alignment of the contralateral ankle. All patients underwent bilateral weightbearing computed tomography and standing plain radiographs. The talar tilt and the distance between the talar lateral process and lateral malleolar tip were measured from a standing ankle anteroposterior radiograph of both sides. Talar and fibular spurs were assessed on the coronal and axial views of weightbearing computed tomography. After simulating the correction of the talar tilt in varus ankle osteoarthritis, talofibular bony impingement was reassessed. Results: On the varus side, the distance between the talar lateral process and the lateral malleolar tip was significantly shorter than that on the contralateral side ( p < .001). Talar spur was present in the varus side of all 30 patients on the axial view of weightbearing computed tomography and in the control side of 10 patients. After the simulation of talar tilt correction, talofibular impingement (overlap) occurred in all 30 patients with a larger extent in the severe talar tilt subgroup ( p < .001). Conclusion: Talofibular impingement by lateral gutter osteophytes is closely related to increased talar tilt in patients with incongruent varus ankle osteoarthritis. Therefore, lateral gutter osteophytes should be resected to stabilize mortise and improve clinical outcomes.

Fibular osteotomy is helpful for talar reduction in the treatment of varus ankle osteoarthritis with supramalleolar osteotomy

Background There have been debates on the necessity of fibular osteotomy (FO) in supramalleolar osteotomy (SMOT) for the treatment of varus ankle osteoarthritis. The purpose of the current study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between SMOT with and without FO in the treatment of varus ankle osteoarthritis. Methods The SMOT group included 39 patients, and the SMOT with FO group included 24 patients. The basic information reached no significant difference between groups. The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS), modified Takakura stage and range of motion (ROM) were used for the functional evaluation. The radiologic parameters were assessed at the last follow-up to compare the degree of talar reduction between the two groups. Results Both groups achieved significant improvements in AOFAS scores, modified Takakura stage as well as AOS pain and functional scores (P༜0.001). The ROM of the ankle joint in the SMOT group was significantly decreased (P = 0.022). In both groups, all of the radiological parameters were significantly improved (P༜0.01). The tibiofibular clear space (TFCS) was significantly widened in the SMOT group (P༜0.001). No significant difference was found between the two groups according to the functional outcomes. However, the talar tilt angle (TT) and hindfoot alignment angle (HFA) in the SMOT with FO group were significantly smaller than those in the SMOT group (P༜0.05). The TFCS was significantly widened in the SMOT group (P = 0.001). The medial displacement of the talus (MDT) was better reduced in the SMOT with FO group (P = 0.006). Conclusion SMOT is a promising procedure for functional improvement and malalignment correction in varus ankle osteoarthritis but reduces ankle range of motion. If SMOT is combined with FO, talar tilt and medial displacement will be better reduced.

Radiographic Outcomes of Proximal vs Distal Syndesmotic Low Tibial Osteotomy

Background: We aimed to determine whether the location of tibial osteotomy affects the outcome during low tibial osteotomy (LTO) with fibular osteotomy for varus ankle arthritis by comparing proximal syndesmotic (PS) and distal syndesmotic (DS) tibial osteotomy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the radiographic findings of 50 cases (among 47 patients) who underwent LTO with fibular osteotomy for varus ankle arthritis. The enrolled patients were divided into 2 groups according to the location of the tibial osteotomy: the PS group (25 cases, 24 patients) and the DS group (25 cases, 23 patients). Radiographic parameters were compared between the 2 groups. Results: There were no significant differences in tibial anterior and lateral surface angles, tibiomedial malleolar angle, talar center migration, and intermalleolar distance correction between the 2 groups (all P > .05). However, the decreases in talar tilt (TT) and talocrural angle (TCA) were more pronounced in the DS group than in the PS group (both P < .05). Among patients with TT ≥8 degrees, a greater decrease in TT (+1.0 degrees vs –2.8 degrees) and TCA was observed in the DS group, whereas the PS group demonstrated greater increases in TCA and intermalleolar distance (all P < .01). Conclusion: In this series, DS tibial osteotomy combined with fibular osteotomy was a more effective operative option than PS tibial osteotomy to correct both extra- and intra-articular deformity for varus ankle arthritis. Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Joint Preservation Surgery for Varus Ankle Arthritis with Large Talar Tilt

Background: Varus ankle arthritis with large talar tilt (TT) is a challenging condition when considering joint preservation surgery. Three-dimensional deformity of the talus has been demonstrated with weightbearing computed tomography in varus ankle arthritis with large TT. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and radiographic results of posterior tibial tendon (PTT) transfer generally combined with bony realignment for varus ankle arthritis with large TT in nonparalytic ankle arthritis and to determine the indications for PTT transfer. Methods: This study includes 23 ankles with varus arthritis and TT larger than 7.5 degrees. Patients were categorized into improved (19 ankles) and unimproved (4 ankles) groups according to the postoperative clinical results at the last follow-up. Clinical and radiographic results were compared between the groups. A cut-off point for preoperative TT that indicated a borderline between improved and unimproved groups was determined to suggest the appropriate indication for joint preservation surgery. Results: In the improved group, TT, radiographic stage, Meary angle, and hindfoot alignment significantly improved at 6 months after surgery and were maintained at the last follow-up. In the unimproved group, the radiographic parameters mentioned above did not improve at 6 months after surgery, and TT decreased to 0.8 degrees as radiographic stage had progressed to end-stage arthritis at the last follow-up. In this small series, the cut-off point for predicting failure of surgery was 14.3 degrees of preoperative TT. Conclusion: PTT transfer often combined with bony realignment procedures may be a reasonable option for treating painful varus ankle arthritis with TT less than 14 degrees and hindfoot varus. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.

Lateral Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstring Graft for Ankle Instability: Outcomes for Primary and Revision Cases

Background: Optimal treatment for patients with severe ankle instability or failed previous ankle stabilization is not well defined, and newer techniques have limited presence in the literature. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiographic outcomes after modified anatomic lateral ligament reconstruction using hamstring auto- or allograft in primary cases versus revision cases. We hypothesized that patients undergoing a revision procedure would demonstrate inferior patient-reported and radiographic outcomes. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients who underwent modified anatomic lateral ligament reconstruction by a single surgeon between 2010 and 2017 were identified. Indications included failure of previous ankle stabilization or severe ankle laxity. Patients completed preoperative and minimum 1-year postoperative Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) surveys. They also underwent pre- and postoperative stress radiographs using the Telos Stress Device. Results: A total of 41 patients (42 ankles) were identified. The mean age was 32.1 years, and 36 patients (88%) were women. There were 25 primary procedures and 17 revision procedures. Hamstring autograft was utilized in 35 ankles and hamstring allograft in 7 ankles. A total of 34 patients (83%) provided postoperative patient-reported outcome scores at a mean of 26 months (range, 12-65 months). When comparing primary versus revision procedures, revision patients had significantly lower FAOS Pain (77.14 vs 90.66; P = .009), Sports (63.46 vs 82.16; P = .008), and Quality of Life (53.53 vs 76.70; P = .002) scores. In total, 34 patients (83%) had stress radiographs at a mean of 14 months (range, 3-62 months) postoperatively. Revision patients also had lower, though statistically insignificant, postoperative talar tilt measurements on average (5.73° vs 7.10°; P = .252), and pre- to postoperative change in talar tilt was not significantly different between groups (−4.94° vs −7.03°; P = .415). Conclusion: Revision procedures had significantly lower postoperative patient-reported outcome scores and lower talar tilt compared with patients undergoing a primary procedure, although the pre- to postoperative change in the talar tilt was not significantly different between groups.

Outcomes of Open Versus Arthroscopic Broström Surgery for Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies

Background: Nearly 20% of acute ankle sprains progress to chronic lateral ankle instability that requires surgical intervention. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in arthroscopic Broström techniques as an alternative to open surgery. Purpose: To review the most up-to-date evidence comparing the outcomes of open and arthroscopic Broström procedures for chronic lateral ankle instability. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This review was performed following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Relevant comparative studies in English up to May 2020 were identified. The primary outcomes were (1) functional scores (Karlsson Ankle Function Score and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society [AOFAS] score) and (2) the 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain. The secondary outcomes were differences in (1) postoperative anterior drawer and talar tilt, (2) surgical time and complication rate, and (3) time to return to sports and weightbearing. Results: A total of 408 patients in 8 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 193 (47.3%) patients underwent open surgery, while 215 (52.7%) patients underwent arthroscopic surgery. There were significant differences between the open and arthroscopic repair groups in mean 6-month AOFAS scores (82.4 vs 92.25, respectively; mean difference [MD], 11.36; 95% CI, 0.14-2.56; I 2 = 90%; P = .03), 1-year AOFAS scores (80.05 vs 88.6; MD, –11.96; 95% CI, –21.26 to –2.76; I 2 = 82%; P = .01), 6-month VAS scores (1.7 vs 1.4; MD, –0.38; 95% CI, –0.54 to –0.21; I 2 = 78%; P < .001), and 1-year VAS scores (2.05 vs 1.45; MD, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.09-0.54; I 2 = 0%; P < .001). The mean time to weightbearing was 14.25 and 9.0 weeks in the open and arthroscopic repair groups, respectively (MD, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.24-2.54; I 2 = 99%; P < .001). There were no statistically significant differences in the remaining outcomes evaluated. Conclusion: While technically more demanding, arthroscopic Broström was superior to open Broström-Gould surgery in postoperative AOFAS scores, VAS pain scores, and time to return to weightbearing. The operative time, complication rate, talar tilt, and anterior drawer tests were excellent and statistically comparable. Long-term clinical trials are required before recommending arthroscopic Broström as the new gold standard.

Evaluation of the Intact Anterior Talofibular and Calcaneofibular Ligaments, Injuries, and Repairs With and Without Augmentation: A Biomechanical Robotic Study

Background: Acute ankle sprains are common injuries. The anterior talofibular (ATFL) and calcaneofibular ligaments (CFL) are the most injured lateral structures. However, controversy exists on the optimal surgical treatment when the injury is both acute and severe or becomes chronic and unstable. Studies have evaluated the biomechanics of these ligaments, but no studies have robotically evaluated injury effects and surgical treatment of ATFL or ATFL and CFL injuries. Purpose: To quantitatively evaluate biomechanical effects of ATFL and CFL lesions, ATFL repair, ATFL and CFL repair, and augmentation of ATFL on ankle stability. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Ten nonpaired cadaveric ankles were tested using a 6 degrees of freedom robot. Each ankle underwent testing in the following states sequentially: (1) intact, (2) ATFL cut, (3) CFL cut, (4) ATFL repair + CFL cut, (5) ATFL repair + CFL repair, and (6) ATFL repair with augmentation with suture tape + CFL repair. Testing included 88 N anterior drawer and 5 N·m varus talar tilt tests at 0° and 30° of plantarflexion, and 88 N Cotton test at 0° of plantarflexion. Results: After all surgical treatments ankles still had increased laxity compared with intact state testing, except after augmented ATFL repair + CFL repair in anterior drawer testing at 30° of plantarflexion ( P = .393). Sectioning the CFL caused a significant increase in talar tilt compared with the ATFL cut state at 0° ( P < .001) and 30° of plantarflexion ( P < .001), but no increase in anterior drawer or Cotton tests. Conclusion: Complete native stability may not be attainable at time zero repair with the tested treatments. The option that best returned stability in anterior translation was augmented ATFL repair with nonaugmented CFL repair. The importance of the CFL as a primary ligamentous stabilizer for talar tilt was confirmed. Clinical Relevance: Evaluating lateral ankle stability and treatment with a 6 degrees of freedom robot should help delineate optimal treatment options. Findings in this study show that none of the repair methods at time zero restored kinematics to the intact state. Of the tested states, the augmented ATFL repair with CFL repair was the best option for controlling anterior translation at time zero. The importance of addressing the CFL to correct talar tilt instability was suggested as was the importance of a period of immobilization before beginning protected rehabilitation. The benefit of ATFL repair augmentation with suture tape is in limiting the postoperative motion in an anterior drawer motion to just 0.5 to 1 mm, but there was no significant improvement to talar tilt even with CFL repair, suggesting that further consideration should be given to CFL augmentation in future studies.