Fibular osteotomy is helpful for talar reduction in the treatment of varus ankle osteoarthritis with supramalleolar osteotomy

Background There have been debates on the necessity of fibular osteotomy (FO) in supramalleolar osteotomy (SMOT) for the treatment of varus ankle osteoarthritis. The purpose of the current study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between SMOT with and without FO in the treatment of varus ankle osteoarthritis. Methods The SMOT group included 39 patients, and the SMOT with FO group included 24 patients. The basic information reached no significant difference between groups. The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS), modified Takakura stage and range of motion (ROM) were used for the functional evaluation. The radiologic parameters were assessed at the last follow-up to compare the degree of talar reduction between the two groups. Results Both groups achieved significant improvements in AOFAS scores, modified Takakura stage, as well as AOS pain and functional scores (P < 0.001). The ROM of the ankle joint in the SMOT group was significantly decreased (P = 0.022). In both groups, all of the radiological parameters were significantly improved (P < 0.01). The tibiofibular clear space (TFCS) was significantly widened in the SMOT group (P < 0.001). No significant difference was found between the two groups according to the functional outcomes. However, the talar tilt angle (TT) and hindfoot alignment angle (HFA) in the SMOT with FO group were significantly smaller than those in the SMOT group (P < 0.05). The TFCS was significantly widened in the SMOT group (P = 0.001). The medial displacement of the talus (MDT) was better reduced in the SMOT with FO group (P = 0.006). Conclusion SMOT is a promising procedure for functional improvement and malalignment correction in varus ankle osteoarthritis but reduces ankle range of motion. If SMOT is combined with FO, talar tilt and medial displacement will be better reduced.

Repositional Subtalar Arthrodesis Combined With Supramalleolar Osteotomy for Late-Stage Varus Ankle Arthritis With Hindfoot Valgus

Background: Late-stage varus ankle arthritis is thought to be associated with varus of the tibial plafond and hindfoot. However, some late-stage varus arthritis show hindfoot valgus, which can be explained by subtalar subluxation with opposite directional motion between the talus and calcaneus. We hypothesized that late-stage varus ankle arthritis with hindfoot valgus could improve with repositional subtalar arthrodesis and supramalleolar osteotomy (SMO). The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical and radiographic results of the repositional subtalar arthrodesis combined with SMO for late-stage varus ankle arthritis with hindfoot valgus. Methods: This study includes 16 consecutive patients (16 ankles) with late-stage varus ankle arthritis of Takakura stage 3-b and hindfoot valgus who were treated using repositional subtalar arthrodesis combined with SMO and followed for a minimum of 2 years. Clinical results were assessed with the visual analog scale (VAS) and the Foot Function Index (FFI). Radiographic results were assessed with standard parameters measured on weightbearing foot and ankle radiographs. Clinical and radiographic results were evaluated preoperatively and at the last follow-up. Results: VAS and FFI significantly improved after surgery. Mean talar tilt angle improved from 12.8 ± 2.8 degrees to 3.9 ± 3.1 degrees ( P < .001). Talus center migration and Meary angle significantly improved after surgery. Medial distal tibial angle, lateral talocalcaneal angle, hindfoot moment arm, and talonavicular coverage angle significantly changed after surgery. Radiographic stage improved in 15 ankles (93.8%) after surgery. Conclusion: In this series with minimum 2-year follow-up, we found that late-stage (Takakura stage 3-b) varus ankle arthritis with hindfoot valgus clinically and radiographically improved with repositional subtalar arthrodesis combined with SMO. Level of Evidence: Level IV, prognostic.

Fibular osteotomy is helpful for talar reduction in the treatment of varus ankle osteoarthritis with supramalleolar osteotomy

Background There have been debates on the necessity of fibular osteotomy (FO) in supramalleolar osteotomy (SMOT) for the treatment of varus ankle osteoarthritis. The purpose of the current study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between SMOT with and without FO in the treatment of varus ankle osteoarthritis. Methods The SMOT group included 39 patients, and the SMOT with FO group included 24 patients. The basic information reached no significant difference between groups. The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS), modified Takakura stage and range of motion (ROM) were used for the functional evaluation. The radiologic parameters were assessed at the last follow-up to compare the degree of talar reduction between the two groups. Results Both groups achieved significant improvements in AOFAS scores, modified Takakura stage as well as AOS pain and functional scores (P༜0.001). The ROM of the ankle joint in the SMOT group was significantly decreased (P = 0.022). In both groups, all of the radiological parameters were significantly improved (P༜0.01). The tibiofibular clear space (TFCS) was significantly widened in the SMOT group (P༜0.001). No significant difference was found between the two groups according to the functional outcomes. However, the talar tilt angle (TT) and hindfoot alignment angle (HFA) in the SMOT with FO group were significantly smaller than those in the SMOT group (P༜0.05). The TFCS was significantly widened in the SMOT group (P = 0.001). The medial displacement of the talus (MDT) was better reduced in the SMOT with FO group (P = 0.006). Conclusion SMOT is a promising procedure for functional improvement and malalignment correction in varus ankle osteoarthritis but reduces ankle range of motion. If SMOT is combined with FO, talar tilt and medial displacement will be better reduced.

Clinical Outcomes of Ankle Distraction Arthroplasty Versus Supramalleolar Osteotomy

BackgroundPost-traumatic ankle arthritis is increasing in young people and it is very important to preserve the ankle range of motion in young patients. This study aimed to compare ankle distraction arthroplasty versus supramalleolar osteotomy for post-traumatic ankle arthritis.MethodsThis retrospective study reviewed 32 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for post-traumatic ankle arthritis from January 2015 to December 2018 after failure of conservative treatment. Thirteen ankles that underwent ankle distraction arthroplasty were age-, sex-, and body mass index-matched with 19 ankles that underwent supramalleolar osteotomy. Patients returned for clinical and radiologic follow-up at an average of 32 (range, 24–48) months postoperatively. Outcomes were the comparison of the pre- and postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores and American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scores, complications, subjective patient-rated satisfaction, and ankle function.ResultsThe VAS and AOFAS scores of the two groups were significantly improved at final follow-up compared with preoperatively (p<0.05), but did not significantly differ between groups. The ankle distraction arthroplasty group had better postoperative ankle mobility than the supramalleolar osteotomy group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the tibial anterior surface angle, talar tilt angle, tibial lateral surface angle, and other imaging parameters, but supramalleolar osteotomy was more effective in correcting the load-bearing line of the ankle and hindfoot. The complication rate was similar in both groupsConclusionsAnkle distraction arthroplasty and supramalleolar osteotomy both achieved good pain relief and improved function in patients with traumatic ankle arthritis.Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative series.

Use of a Locking Plate and Drill Sleeves to Guide Dome-Shaped Supramalleolar Osteotomy: Technique Tip

Level of Evidence: Level V, expert opinion.

Changes in Coronal Alignment of the Knee Joint after Supramalleolar Osteotomy

Background. Assessing knee joint orientation changes after SMO may help clinical advancement in managing patients with ipsilateral ankle and knee joint arthritis. However, knee joint changes after supramalleolar osteotomy (SMO) have not been reported. We investigated changes in coronal alignment of the knee joint after SMO. Methods. In this multicentre study, from January 2014 to December 2018, 47 ankles with varus osteoarthritis treated with SMO were retrospectively identified. Ankle joint changes were assessed using the tibiotalar angle, talar tilt angle, and lateral distal tibial angle (LDTA); knee joint changes using the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), medial and lateral joint space widths (mJSW and lJSW, respectively), and medial and lateral joint line convergence angles (JLCA); and lower limb alignment changes using mechanical axis deviation angle (MADA) and the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle measured on full-length anteroposterior radiographs of the lower extremity. Correlation analysis and binary logistic regression analysis were performed. Results. Postoperatively, LDTA ( p < 0.001 ) and tibiotalar angle ( p < 0.001 ) significantly changed, indicating meaningful improvement in the ankle joint varus deformity. Regarding the knee joint changes, JLCA significantly changed into valgus direction ( p = 0.044 ). As for lower limb alignment changes, MADA significantly decreased ( p < 0.001 ), whereas the HKA angle significantly increased ( p < 0.001 ). In univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, changes in the MADA ( p < 0.001 ) and the HKA angle ( p < 0.001 ) were significantly correlated with the correction angle. Conclusions. SMO remarkably improves ankle joint varus deformity, followed by significant lower limb alignment changes. Despite meaningful changes in JLCA, the relationship between the amount of osteotomy near the ankle joint and improvement in knee joint radiographic parameters was not significant. Radiographic parameters of the knee joint would less likely be changed following SMO.

Supramalleolar Fornix Osteotomy Combined Fibular Segamental Resection for Varus Ankle Osteoarthritis

Background: To investigate the safety and clinical effect of supramalleolar fornix osteotomy combined with fibular segmental resection in the treatment of varus ankle osteoarthritis (VAO). Methods: from July 2014 to July 2020, 38 patients with Takakura stage II - III VAO in Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University were retrospectively analyzed, including 31 males and 7 females, 21 left ankles and 17 right ankles. They were divided into open osteotomy group (21 cases) and fornix osteotomy group (17 cases). According to the American Society of foot and ankle surgery ankle and hindfoot score (AOFAS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain function and pain score; weight-bearing ankle acupoints and lateral X-ray imaging evaluation. Results: 38 patients were followed up for 16-54 months (mean 41 months). The healing time of the supramalleolar osteotomy group (3.33 ± 0.90 months) was significantly shorter than that of the open osteotomy group (6.09 ± 1.74 months) (t = -5.932, P = 0.000). The postoperative FAS score of fornix osteotomy group (85.65 ± 6.49) was significantly better than that of open osteotomy group (63.05 ± 6.42), and the postoperative VAS score of fornix osteotomy group (2.12 ± 1.05) was significantly better than that of open osteotomy group (4.38 ± 1.60) (P < 0.05). The improvement of anterior angle of distal tibia, talus inclination angle and talus lateral displacement in the fornix osteotomy group was significantly better than that in the open osteotomy group (P < 0.05); the postoperative lateral angle of distal tibia in the fornix osteotomy group was 82.05 ± 1.74 ° on average, and that in the open osteotomy group was 80.17 ± 1.34 ° on average, with no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The treatment of VAO with supramalleolar fornix osteotomy combined fibular segamental resection can effectively solve the anterior and talus lesions. The deformity correction around CORA can avoid the lateral displacement of the talus and effectively reduce the incidence of postoperative ankle degeneration. Short term follow up convinced better function restoration compared with open supramalleolar osteotomy.