Analysis of Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Minimental State Examination in Patients with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 145-150
Author(s):  
Adimoolam Sendilkumar ◽  
◽  
M.D. Krishna Narayanan ◽  
S. Syamala ◽  
◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 99 (11) ◽  
pp. e174-e175
Author(s):  
Daniel Kim ◽  
Heather Karpel ◽  
Ida Babakhanyan ◽  
Jason Bailie ◽  
Keith Stuessi ◽  
...  

Brain Injury ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 1428-1434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elaine de Guise ◽  
Joanne LeBlanc ◽  
Marie-Claude Champoux ◽  
Céline Couturier ◽  
Abdulrahman Yaqub Alturki ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (11) ◽  
pp. 971-975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Rong Jie Tay ◽  
Yan Ming Soh ◽  
Tegan Kate Plunkett ◽  
Poo Lee Ong ◽  
Wanping Huang ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elaine de Guise ◽  
Abdulrahman Yaqub Alturki ◽  
Joanne LeBlanc ◽  
Marie-Claude Champoux ◽  
Céline Couturier ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Yun. Cheng ◽  
Yong-Zheng. Wang ◽  
Yi. Zhang ◽  
Ya. Wang ◽  
Fan. Xie ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS) has demonstrated usefulness in cognitive assessment. Studies supporting the use of RUDAS as an evaluation tool in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients remain limited. This study examined whether the Chinese version of RUDAS can be effectively applied to the cognitive assessment of TBI patients in China. OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Chinese version of RUDAS in the cognitive assessment of Chinese patients with TBI so as to provide reference for clinical use. METHODS: 86 inpatients with TBI in a hospital were selected from July 2019 to July 2020 and were enrolled as the TBI group, while another 40 healthy individuals matched with age, sex and education level were selected as the control group. All subjects were assessed by trained rehabilitation physicians with MMSE and RUDAS. RESULTS: (1) Compared with the control group, the scores of MMSE and RUDAS in the TBI group decreased significantly; (2) The results of MMSE and RUDAS in the TBI group were positively correlated (r = 0.611, P <  0.001); (3) Linear correlation suggested that age was negatively correlated with MMSE (r = –0.344, P = 0.001) and RUDAS (r = –0.407, P <  0.001), while education years were positively correlated with MMSE (r = 0.367, P = 0.001) and RUDAS (r = 0.375, P <  0.001). However, according to the multiple linear regression, the results of RUDAS were not affected by the years of education; (4) Receiver operating curve analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the areas under the curve between MMSE and RUDAS. The best cut-off values of MMSE and RUDAS were 27.5 and 24.5, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: MMSE and RUDAS have similar diagnostic efficacy in evaluating cognitive impairment of patients with TBI. Since the Chinese version of RUDAS is not affected by the education level, it is more suitable for TBI patients in China.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document