scholarly journals Radiographic and clinical outcome of lumbar lateral interbody fusion for extreme lumbar spinal stenosis of Schizas grade D: a retrospective study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Li ◽  
Hao Li ◽  
Zhang Ning ◽  
Zhi-wei Wang ◽  
Teng-fei Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Central Canal ◽  
Posterior Decompression ◽  
Canal Diameter ◽  
Lumbar Spinal ◽  
Lateral Interbody

Abstract Background: Extreme lumbar spinal stenosis was thought to be a relative contraindication for lumbar lateral interbody fusion (LLIF) and was excluded in most studies. This is a retrospective study to analyze the radiographic and clinical outcome of LLIF for extreme lumbar spinal stenosis of Schizas grade D.Methods: For radiographic analysis, we included 202 segments from 124 patients who underwent LLIF between June 2017 and December 2018. Lumbar spinal stenosis was graded according to Schizas’ classification. Anterior and posterior disc heights, disc angle, foramen height, spinal canal diameter and central canal area were measured on CT and MRI. For clinical analysis, 18 patients with at least one segment of grade D were included. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores were used to evaluate clinical outcome. Continuous variables were confronted by using Student's t-test, obtaining a statistically significant difference for values inferior to 0.05.Results: Among the 202 segments included for radiological evaluation, there were 42 grade A segments, 41 grade B segments, 101 grade C segments and 18 grade D segments. Postoperatively, the average change of midsagittal canal diameter of grade D was significantly greater than that of grade A, and not significantly different compared to grades B and C. As to the average changes of disc height, bilateral foraminal height, disc angle and central canal area (CCA), grade D was not significantly different from the others. The average postoperative CCA of grade D was significantly smaller than the average preoperative CCA of grade C. Eighteen patients with grade D stenosis were followed up for an average of 19.61 ± 6.32 months. Clinical evaluation revealed an average improvement in the ODI and VAS scores for back and leg pain by 20.77%, 3.67 and 4.15 points, respectively. Sixteen of 18 segments with grade D underwent posterior decompression.Conclusion: The radiographic decompression effect of LLIF for Schizas grade D segments were comparable with that of other grades. Posterior decompression was necessary for LLIF to achieve a satisfactory clinical outcome for extreme lumbar spinal stenosis of Schizas grade D.

scholarly journals Radiographic and clinical outcome of lumbar lateral interbody fusion for extreme lumbar spinal stenosis of Schizas grade D: a retrospective study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Li ◽  
Hao Li ◽  
Zhang Ning ◽  
Zhi-wei Wang ◽  
Teng-fei Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Central Canal ◽  
Posterior Decompression ◽  
Canal Diameter ◽  
Average Change ◽  
Lumbar Spinal ◽  
Lateral Interbody

Abstract Background: Extreme lumbar spinal stenosis was thought to be a relative contraindication for lumbar lateral interbody fusion (LLIF) and was excluded in most studies. This is a retrospective study to analyze the radiographic and clinical outcome of LLIF for extreme lumbar spinal stenosis of Schizas grade D. Methods: For radiographic analysis, we included 181 segments from 110 patients who underwent LLIF between June 2017 and December 2018. Lumbar spinal stenosis was graded according to Schizas’ classification. Anterior and posterior disc heights, disc angle, foramen height, spinal canal diameter and central canal area were measured on CT and MRI. For clinical analysis, 18 patients with at least one segment of grade D were included. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores were used to evaluate clinical outcome. Continuous variables were compared using Student's t-test, with P- values < 0.05 considered to indicate statistically significant differences. Results: Among the 181 segments included for radiological evaluation, there were 23 grade A segments, 37 grade B segments, 103 grade C segments and 18 grade D segments. Postoperatively, the average change of midsagittal canal diameter of grade D was significantly greater than that of grade A, and not significantly different compared to grades B and C. As to the average change of disc height, bilateral foraminal height, disc angle and central canal area (CCA), grade D was not significantly different from the others. The average postoperative CCA of grade D was significantly smaller than the average preoperative CCA of grade C. Eighteen patients with grade D stenosis were followed up for an average of 19.61 ± 6.32 months. Clinical evaluation revealed an average improvement in the ODI and VAS scores for back and leg pain by 20.77%, 3.67 and 4.15 points, respectively. Sixteen of 18 segments with grade D underwent posterior decompression. Conclusion: The radiographic decompression effect of LLIF for Schizas grade D segments was comparable with that of other grades. Posterior decompression was necessary for LLIF to achieve a satisfactory clinical outcome for extreme lumbar spinal stenosis of Schizas grade D.

scholarly journals S-line as Predictor of Clinical Outcome for Patients Undergone Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yilin Lu ◽  
Jian Zhu ◽  
Xi Luo ◽  
Kaiqiang Sun ◽  
Jingchuan Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Sagittal Alignment ◽  
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Lumbar Spinal

Abstract Background: Some have speculated that LSTV has an impact on lumbar curve. A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate S-line as predictor of clinical outcome for patients undergone transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis.Methods: 126 patients undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion were enrolled. S-line stands for the connecting line between the highest points of the iliac crests on both sides. The patients were divided into two groups according to the position of S-line, S-line (-) group included patients whose S-line were between L4 and L5, and S-line (+) group included patients whose S-line is above or below this range, which were divided into two subgroups. Their pre-operative imaging data about sagittal alignment were collected, including lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), pelvic incidence (PI) and pelvic tilt (PT). Clinical outcomes were measured using Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, the Oswestry disability index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS) before the surgery and postoperatively. The correlation of S-line and clinical outcomes, as well as sagittal alignment and clinical outcomes, were analyzed.Results: LL, SS, PI, PT and PI minus(-) LL of S-line (-) group were (45.39°±12.68°), (30.27°±10.55°), (43.32°±12.22°), (13.05°±6.52°), (-2.07°±8.20°), respectively, and those parameters of S-line (+) group were (40.29±14.92), (35.70°±14.09°), (52.59°±17.07°), (16.89°±8.24°), (12.30°±9.98°), respectively. Significant difference were seen in the above parameters between S-line (-) and S-line (+) group. For S-line (-) and S-line (+) group, post-operative JOA score were (22.39±2.12), (20.26±2.46), post-operative VAS were (2.07±0.88), (3.14±1.47), the post-operative ODI were (8.36±3.28), (11.82±3.32), the improvement rate is (0.61±0.13), (0.55±0.15), Significant differences of those parameters are seen between S-line (-) group and S-line (+) group.Conclusion: S-line is a reliable predictor of clinical outcome for patients undergone transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Indirect Decompression in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Stand-alone Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Liu ◽  
Quanlai Zhao ◽  
Yu Zhang ◽  
Liang Xiao ◽  
Xin Ge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽  
Indirect Decompression ◽  
Lumbar Spinal ◽  
Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lateral Interbody

Abstract Background Oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) has been gained more and more attention in the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of indirect decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis with stand-alone OLIF. Methods Sixty-three patients with lumbar spinal stenosis who underwent stand-alone OLIF between July 2017 and May 2018 our department were included. Clinical outcomes including visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were recorded. Radiographic outcomes comprising of disc height (DH), foraminal height (FH) and lumbar lordosis (LL) were measured. Intraoperative data and complications were collected. All the data were compared preoperatively and postoperatively. Results Eighty-two segments were fused in sixty-three patients using stand-alone OLIF. The average follow-up time was 21.9±3.5 months (range from 16 to 28 months). The DH increased from 0.9±0.3 cm preoperatively to 1.3±0.2 cm postoperatively, and the final follow-up was 1.1±0.2 cm (P < 0.01). The FH increased from 1.7±0.3 cm before surgery to 2.3±0.3 cm after surgery, but decreased to 2.1±0.3 cm at final follow-up (P < 0.01). The LL increased from 38.0°±15.6° before surgery to 42.7°±13.0° at the final follow-up (p<0.01). The VAS and ODI scores of all patients significantly improved at the final follow-up (p<0.01). The total complication rate was 30.2%. Only three patients received revision of posterior decompression and pedicle screw fixation. Conclusions Stand-alone OLIF is an effective option in selected patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

scholarly journals Oblique lateral interbody fusion to treat lumbar spinal stenosis in a patient with situs inversus totalis: a case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (7) ◽  
pp. 030006052110328
Author(s):  
FengKai Yang ◽  
ChenTao Dou ◽  
XiaoKang Cheng ◽  
Bin Chen
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Situs Inversus ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Situs Inversus Totalis ◽  
Anatomical Structures ◽  
Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Spinal ◽  
Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lateral Interbody

Oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) is a minimally invasive spinal surgery that is popular for lumbar degeneration and spinal deformity treatment because it causes minimal damage to the stability of the intervertebral structures. However, when encountering abnormal anatomical structures caused by situs inversus, surgical routes must be adjusted to avoid serious complications. A 42-year-old woman with lumbar spinal stenosis presented to our hospital. Preoperative X-ray and computed tomography indicated situs inversus totalis, with the abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava reversed. We established an appropriate surgical approach for OLIF via the right abdomen according to the characteristics of the anatomical structures. Postoperative X-rays showed adequate positioning of the interbody fusion cage and internal fixation screws. At the 3-month follow-up, the patient reported resolution of her symptoms. Vascular variations caused by situs inversus totalis can affect the course of OLIF. Understanding the unique anatomical structure in such patients is crucial for successful surgery and to avoid intraoperative complications.

scholarly journals RADIOFREQUENCY FACILITATED MANUAL SEMI-ENDOSCOPIC DISCECTOMY UTILIZING THE DISC FX® SYSTEM IN THE TREATMENT OF DISC-PREDOMINATE LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS

2018 ◽  
pp. 173-181
Author(s):  
George J. Arcos
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Central Canal ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Radiographic Evidence ◽  
Canal Stenosis ◽  
Canal Diameter ◽  
Endoscopic Discectomy ◽  
Lumbar Spinal

Background: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) occurs with increasing prevalence in the elderly population. The American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons has estimated that by 2021, 2.4 million adults in the United States (8-11% of the population) will be affected by this condition. Surgical options for LSS are being performed with increased frequency, high cost, and substantial risk of life-threatening complications. While nonsurgical treatment options for LSS are available, they are limited by patient selection (ligamentum flavum hypertrophy) or high rates of reoperation (Interspinous process spacer devices). This study is the first to suggest a minimally invasive treatment option for disc-predominate lumbar central canal stenosis. Objectives: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of radiofrequency facilitated manual semi-endoscopic discectomy utilizing the Disc FX® system in the treatment of disc-predominate lumbar spinal stenosis. Study Design: Single center, prospective, observational study. Setting: Multi-specialty private practice clinic. The Medical Group of South Florida, Jupiter, FL. Methods: This study involved 6 patients with disc-predominant lumbar central spinal stenosis. All patients were treated with the Disc FX® system. Radiographic evidence of central lumbar stenosis was confirmed by measurement of minimum AP canal diameter (mm) performed by 1 board-certified neuroradiologist. Inclusion criteria included absence of lumbar surgery, physical therapy within the previous 6 months, failure of epidural steroid injections (3) within the previous 8 months, spondylolisthesis limited to Grade I, disc height > 50%, presence of low back axial pain + leg pain exacerbated by walking, and relieved with sitting or forward flexion, absence of dermatomal radicular leg pain, radiographic evidence of disc displacement > 4 mm from disc endplate. Zurich claudication (symptom severity and physical function scale was administered 1 week preoperatively, and again 6 months postoperatively. There were no patients lost to follow up. Results: All patients in the study demonstrated moderate-severe or severe central canal stenosis, with an average AP canal diameter of 6.63 mm for all treated disc levels and 5.5 mm for the most severe levels. There was a mean improvement of 57% in a symptom severity scale and 56% in the physical function scale at 6 months. This exceeds the improvement reported with interspinous spacer devices. Limitations: Limitations include very small sample size, observational design, non-randomization, absence of share controls, short follow-up period. Conclusion: For patients suffering from discpredominant lumbar spinal stenosis, The Disc FX® System provides an effective, low-cost alternative to surgical intervention. Key words: Spinal, stenosis, claudication, disc, Disc FX®, operative, minimally invasive, Zürich claudication score

scholarly journals Augmenting posterolateral fusion with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage improves clinical outcome, but not fusion rate, of posterior decompression

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 030006052091002
Author(s):  
Teoman Atici ◽  
Selcan Yerebakan ◽  
Cenk Ermutlu ◽  
Ali Özyalçın
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Posterior Decompression ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Lumbar Spinal

Objective This study was performed to compare fusion rates and clinical outcomes of posterior decompression by posterolateral fusion (PLF) versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods This retrospective cohort study involved 157 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis treated with instrumented PLF alone or instrumented PLF combined with TLIF from 2010 to 2018. The patients were divided into two groups: the PLF group (Group A), in which posterior decompression with instrumented PLF was performed, and the cage-augmented group (Group B), in which TLIF was added to the procedures described for the PLF group. Patient outcomes (Oswestry Disability Index, visual analog scale score, and 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey scores) and fusion rates were compared. Results The fusion rate was similar between the two groups. Among patients with two- and three-level fusion, improvements in the clinical outcome scores were significantly greater in Group B than Group A. Conclusion Combining TLIF with PLF provides better clinical outcomes than PLF alone when multilevel fusion is indicated. TLIF augmentation does not improve the fusion rates in either single- or multi-level surgery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document