scholarly journals Significantly Earlier Ambulation and Reduced Risk of Near-Falls with Continuous Infusion Nerve Blocks: A Retrospective Pilot Study of Adductor Canal Block Compared to Femoral Nerve Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Author(s):  
Yutaka Fujita ◽  
Hisashi Mera ◽  
Tatsunori Watanabe ◽  
Kenta Furutani ◽  
Haruna O. Kondo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: One option in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) perioperative pain management is femoral nerve block (FNB). Its association with quadriceps weakness has led to a focus on adductor canal block (ACB), with the aim of avoiding weakness in adjacent muscles. This study reviewed cases at our institution. Methods: In this pilot non-blinded study, nerve block (FNB or ACB) was performed under ultrasonic guidance after induction of general anesthesia, with an initial bolus followed by continuous levobupivacaine infusion into the perineurium as needed until postoperative day (POD) 2 or 3. Pain levels and falls/near-falls with knee-buckling were monitored from POD 1 to POD 3. The score on the manual muscle test, MMT (0 to 5, 5 being normal), of the patients who had been able to ambulate on POD 1, was investigated. Results: A total of 73 TKA cases, 37 FNB and 36 ACB, met the inclusion criteria. Episodes of near-falls in the form of knee-buckling were witnessed in 14 (38%) cases in the FNB group and in 4 (11%) in the ACB group (p = 0.0068). In the ACB group, 81.1% of patients were able to ambulate with parallel bars on POD 1, while only 44.4% of FNB patients could do so (p = 0.0019). The quadriceps MMT values of patients able to ambulate with parallel bars on POD 1 in the ACB group was 2.82, significantly higher than 1.97 in the FNB group (p = 0.0035). There were no significant differences in pain as measured with a numerical rating scale (NRS) through POD 3. Conclusion: Compared to FNB, ACB was associated with significantly less knee-buckling and earlier initiation of ambulation post-TKA, with better quadriceps muscle strength. These findings support the use of ACB as the anesthesia method of choice for TKA.

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 215145932199663
Author(s):  
Mustafa Kaçmaz ◽  
Zeynep Yüksel Turhan

Introduction: Femoral Nerve Block (FNB) and Adductor Canal Block (ACB) methods, which are regional analgesic techniques, are successfully used in postoperative pain control after total knee arthroplasty. This study aimed to compare adductor canal block method that was preoperatively used and femoral nerve block method in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients who underwent spinal anesthesia in terms of factors effecting patient satisfaction and determine whether these methods were equally effective or not. Methods: A total of 80 patients between the ages of 60 and 75 who were in the American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) physical status of I-III were prospectively included in this randomized study. Patients (n = 40) who received FNB were called Group FNB and patients (n = 40) who received Adductor Canal Block were called Group ACB. Results: Although mean postoperative VAS values were lower in FNB group only in the first hour (p = 0.02) there was no significant difference between the groups in the third, fifth, seventh, ninth, 12th and 24th hours (p≥0.05). Although Bromage scores were lower in FNB group in the first, second, third, fourth and fifth hours there was no statistically significant difference between the groups (p≥0.05). When mobilization time, patient satisfaction level, time of first analgesia, intraoperative sedation need, and recovery time of sensorial block were compared no statistically significant difference was found (p≥0.05). Discussion: When ACB and FNB that are used for postoperative analgesia in patients who undergo total knee arthroplasty are compared in terms of factors affecting patient satisfaction it is observed that they result in the same level (non-inferiority) of patient satisfaction. Conclusion: We recommend the routine use of ACB method with FNB in total knee arthroplasty. More studies focusing especially on measuring patient satisfaction are needed.


2016 ◽  
Vol 122 (5) ◽  
pp. 1696-1703 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nabil M. Elkassabany ◽  
Sean Antosh ◽  
Moustafa Ahmed ◽  
Charles Nelson ◽  
Craig Israelite ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document