Screening and Validation of a Novel T Stage-Lymph Node Ratio Classification for Colon Cancer

Author(s):  
Jun-Peng Pei ◽  
Rui Zhang ◽  
Nan-Nan Zhang ◽  
Yong-Ji Zeng ◽  
Zhe Sun ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Lymph node ratio (LNR) has advantages in predicting prognosis over the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) N stage. However, the prognostic value of establishing a novel T stage-Lymph Node Ratio classification (TLNR) for colon cancer by combining LNR and T stage is currently unknown.Methods We included 62,294 stage I-III colon cancer patients from the SEER data base as a training cohort. An external validation was performed in 3,327 additional patients. A novel LNR stage was established and included into a novel TLNR classification by combining with T stage. Patients with similar survivals were grouped according to T and LNR stages, with T1LNR1 as a reference. Results We developed a novel TLNR classification: stages I (T1LNR1-2, T1LNR4), IIA (T1LNR3, T2LNR1-2, T3LNR1), IIB (T1LNR5, T2LNR3-4, T3LNR2, T4aLNR1), IIC (T2LNR5, T3LNR3-4, T4aLNR2, T4bLNR1), IIIA (T3LNR5, T4aLNR3-4, T4bLNR2), IIIB (T4aLNR5, T4bLNR3-4), and IIIC (T4bLNR5). In the training cohort, the TLNR had better prognostic discrimination [area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), 0.621 vs. 0.608, P < 0.001], superior model-fitting ability in predicting overall survival [Akaike information criteria (AIC), 561,129 vs. 562,052], and better net benefits than the AJCC 8th tumor/node/metastasis (TNM) classification. Those results were successfully validated in predicting both overall and disease-free survivals in an independent validation set. Conclusions The TLNR classification has better prognostic discrimination, model-fitting ability and net benefits than the AJCC 8th TNM classification for better stratifying operable colon cancer patients, especially in patients with less than 12 retrieved lymph nodes.

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Jun-Peng Pei ◽  
Rui Zhang ◽  
Nan-Nan Zhang ◽  
Yong-Ji Zeng ◽  
Zhe Sun ◽  
...  

Gut ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 55 (11) ◽  
pp. 1681-1681 ◽  
Author(s):  
M De Ridder ◽  
V Vinh-Hung ◽  
Y Van Nieuwenhove ◽  
A Hoorens ◽  
A Sermeus ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 30 (4-6) ◽  
pp. 368-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiichi Sugimoto ◽  
Kazuhiro Sakamoto ◽  
Yuichi Tomiki ◽  
Michitoshi Goto ◽  
Yutaka Kojima ◽  
...  

BMC Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Riaz Baqar ◽  
Simon Wilkins ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Karen Oliva ◽  
Paul McMurrick

Apmis ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (6) ◽  
pp. 490-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luka Stanisavljević ◽  
Karl Søndenaa ◽  
Kristian Eeg Storli ◽  
Sabine Leh ◽  
Idunn Nesvik ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15666-e15666
Author(s):  
Darragh Connell ◽  
Brian Richard Bird ◽  
Derbrenn O'Connor

2008 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 1600-1608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiping Wang ◽  
James M. Hassett ◽  
Merril T. Dayton ◽  
Mahmoud N. Kulaylat

2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 2453-2460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin-lin Tong ◽  
Peng Gao ◽  
Zhen-ning Wang ◽  
Yong-xi Song ◽  
Ying-ying Xu ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 190-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hirotoshi Kobayashi ◽  
Masayuki Enomoto ◽  
Tetsuro Higuchi ◽  
Hiroyuki Uetake ◽  
Satoru Iida ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document