scholarly journals Silicone Intubation in External Dacryocystorhinostomy

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (12) ◽  
pp. 1814-1816 ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 878-881 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ibrahim B. Buttanri ◽  
Didem Serin ◽  
Safak Karslioğlu ◽  
Muslime Akbaba ◽  
Korhan Fazil ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 87 (4) ◽  
pp. 438-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang Won Hwang ◽  
Sang In Khwarg ◽  
Jong Hyun Kim ◽  
Ho Kyung Choung ◽  
Nam Ju Kim

2009 ◽  
Vol 93 (9) ◽  
pp. 1220-1222 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Saiju ◽  
L J Morse ◽  
D Weinberg ◽  
M K Shrestha ◽  
S Ruit

2010 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 152-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. J. Winn ◽  
S. D. Smith ◽  
D. D. Garcia ◽  
A. Jian-Amadi ◽  
B. S. Sires

2007 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nam Ju Kim ◽  
Jong Hyun Kim ◽  
Sang Won Hwang ◽  
Ho Kyung Choung ◽  
Yong Jae Lee ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amin Faisal Ellakwa ◽  
Osama Abdallah Elmorsy ◽  
Marwa Ali Zaki

Abstract Purpose: To compare external dacryocystorhinostomy versus canalicular silicone intubation with the use of Mitomycin C (MMC) in primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO). Methods: the study was carried out at the department of Ophthalmology, Menoufia university Hospital, Egypt, between June 2012 to July 2014. Fifty-six patients who were diagnosed with primary acquired NLDO. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: thirty cases underwent external DCR and twenty-six cases underwent silicone intubation with MMC. Results: No significant difference was detected in success and failure rates between external DCR (90%) and silicon intubation with MMC (80.7%) at 6 months follow up. Also, both procedures were associated with low rate of intraoperative adverse events, with no postoperative adverse events were detected, however, intubation was relatively safer than DCR. Conclusion: Silicon intubation with MMC is as effective and safe as external DCR and should be considered as a minimally invasive procedure in primary acquired NLDO. Keywords: External DCR, canalicular silicone intubation, Mitomycin C.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-24
Author(s):  
Omar M. Massoud ◽  
Molham A. Elbakary ◽  
Osama E. Shalaby ◽  
Aiman A. Hashish

Aim: Evaluation of the role of silicone intubation in non-complicated External dacryocystorhinostomy (Ext-DCR). Background: Silicone intubation is described as a step of Ext-DCR. It was proposed that it may prevent obstruction involving the osteotomy or the common canaliculus. However, its necessity in non-complicated Ext-DCR is controversial. Objective: To study the effect of intubation and its duration on the results of non-complicated Ext-DCR. Methods: A prospective randomized interventional study that included 75 Ext-DCRs. Patients with a high risk of failure were not included. Patients were randomly distributed between 3 equal groups with either traditional 3 months intubation (group A), short-term intubation for 2-3 weeks (group B), or non-intubation (group C). Results: The success rate was 92%, 96%, and 92% in groups A, B, and C, respectively, with no significant differences (P = 0.853). Temporary foreign body sensation was reported in 16% in group A and 12% in group B. No significant complications were recorded in any of the 3 groups. Conclusion: Intubation (either short-term or 3 months) did not affect the results of Ext-DCR, which gives more evidence that it is not necessary in non-complicated cases.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document