No-Till and Strip-Till Soybean Production with Surface and Subsurface Phosphorus and Potassium Fertilization

2011 ◽  
Vol 103 (6) ◽  
pp. 1862-1869 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhupinder S. Farmaha ◽  
Fabián G. Fernández ◽  
Emerson D. Nafziger
2019 ◽  
Vol 111 (5) ◽  
pp. 2462-2471
Author(s):  
João A. Antonangelo ◽  
Ruan F. Firmano ◽  
Luís R. F. Alleoni ◽  
Adilson Oliveira ◽  
Hailin Zhang

2013 ◽  
Vol 04 (12) ◽  
pp. 39-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jairo André Schlindwein ◽  
Leandro Bortolon ◽  
Elaine Cosma Fioreli-Pereira ◽  
Elisandra Solange Oliveira Bortolon ◽  
Clesio Gianello

1998 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
William G. Johnson ◽  
Jeffrey S. Dilbeck ◽  
Michael S. Defelice ◽  
J. Andrew Kendig

Field studies were conducted at three locations in 1993 and 1994 to evaluate weed control and crop response to combinations of glyphosate, metolachlor, 0.5 X and 1 X label rates of chlorimuron plus metribuzin applied prior to planting (PP), and 0.5 X and 1 X label rates of imazethapyr applied early postemergence (EPOST) or postemergence (POST) in no-till narrow-row soybean production. Giant foxtail densities were reduced with sequential PP followed by (fb) EPOST or POST treatments. Large crabgrass was reduced equivalently with all herbicide combinations involving chlorimuron plus metribuzin PP fb imazethapyr. Common cocklebur control was variable but was usually greater with treatments that included imazethapyr. Ivyleaf morningglory densities were not reduced with any herbicide combinations. Sequential PP fb EPOST or POST treatments tended to provide slightly better weed suppression than PP-only treatments, but the difference was rarely significant. Soybean yields with treatments utilizing 0.5 X rates were usually equal to 1 X rates.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document