Physiological Bases of Across-Environment and Environment-Specific Responses for Grain Yield in Maize Hybrids Obtained from a Full Diallel Mating Design

Crop Science ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 180-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugenia M. Munaro ◽  
Abelardo J. de la Vega ◽  
Karina E. D'Andrea ◽  
Carlos D. Messina ◽  
Maria E. Otegui
2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah D. Turner ◽  
Paul L. Maurizio ◽  
William Valdar ◽  
Brian S. Yandell ◽  
Philipp W. Simon

ABSTRACTCrop establishment in carrot (Daucus carota L.) is limited by slow seedling growth and delayed canopy closure, resulting in high management costs for weed control. Varieties with improved growth habit (i.e. larger canopy and increased shoot biomass) may help mitigate weed control, but the underlying genetics of these traits in carrot is unknown. This project used a diallel mating design coupled with recent Bayesian analytical methods to determine the genetic basis of carrot shoot growth. Six diverse carrot inbred lines with variable shoot size were crossed in WI in 2014. F1 hybrids, reciprocal crosses, and parental selfs were grown in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with two blocks in CA (2015, 2016) and in WI (2015). Measurements included canopy height, canopy width, shoot biomass, and root biomass. General and specific combining abilities were estimated using Griffing’s Model I. In parallel, additive, inbreeding, epistatic, and maternal effects were estimated from a Bayesian linear mixed model, which is more robust to dealing with missing data, outliers, and theoretical constraints than traditional biometric methods. Both additive and non-additive effects significantly influenced shoot traits, with non-additive effects playing a larger role early in the growing season, when weed control is most critical. Results suggest that early season canopy growth and root size express hybrid vigor and can be improved through reciprocal recurrent selection.Article SummaryBreeding for improved competitive ability is a priority in carrot, which suffers yield losses under weed pressure. However, improvement and in-depth genetic studies for these traits relies on knowledge of the underlying genetic architecture. This study estimated heritable and non-heritable components of carrot shoot growth from a diallel mating design using a Bayesian mixed model. Results directly contribute to improvement efforts by providing estimates of combining ability, identifying a useful tester line, and characterizing the genetic and non-genetic influences on traits for improved competitive ability in carrot.


1985 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 107
Author(s):  
TS Ch'ang ◽  
R Evans

A three-breed diallel mating design was used to generate 632 rams comprising three purebreds (Dorset Horn, Merino and Corriedale) and their six contemporary F1 crossbreds in the CSIRO Sheep Crossbreeding Experiment to provide materials for studying the heterosis and breed effects on carcass traits of intact rams maintained under pasture grazing conditions. The rams were slaughtered at an average age of 21 months, at which time their average (� s.e.) carcass weight was 28.4 � 0.2 kg. This paper, the first of a series, is concerned with estimation of the linear effects due to heterosis (h') and breed-transmitted effect (gI) and breed-maternal effect (gM) on cold carcass weight and weight components (edible meat, bones and excess fat trim) of the carcass. The results showed that, in general, gI was more important than gM. Whether evaluated as a purebred, or as a paternal or maternal breed, the Dorset Horn produced more edible meat per sheep than either the Merino or the Corriedale. In terms of excess fat trim, the Corriedale tended to be the most wasteful. A significant (P < 0.05) heterosis effect was observed on all traits under investigation, but its main impact was on excess fat trim, where the h1 varied with the specific breed combination and ranged from 10% to 30%, but averaged c. 24% for the whole population.


2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 411-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah D. Turner ◽  
Paul L. Maurizio ◽  
William Valdar ◽  
Brian S. Yandell ◽  
Philipp W. Simon

Agriways ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 08 (01) ◽  
pp. 45-49
Author(s):  
Ranjit Singh ◽  
Ravindra Kumar ◽  
Jujhar Singh ◽  
Raksha Pal Singh

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 250-256
Author(s):  
Okello Anyanga Walter ◽  
Rubaihayo Patrick ◽  
Gibson Paul ◽  
Okori Patrick

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document