The Help that May Hurt: On the Link between Institutional Ownership and Cost of Debt Capital

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley Wang ◽  
Gaiyan Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Cost Of Debt ◽  
Debt Capital

The Influence of Growth, Asset Tangibility, Cost of Debt, Profitability and Business Risk On Debt Capital

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 120-127
Author(s):  
Erika Jimena Arilyn ◽  
Beny Beny
Keyword(s):  
Firm Growth ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Panel Data Analysis ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Jel Classification ◽  
Cost Of Debt ◽  
Market Condition ◽  
Business Risk ◽  
Debt Capital

Objective –The aims to identify the significant factors that influence a company’s decision to use debt capital. Methodology/Technique – This study uses 5 independent variables namely; firm growth (growth rate in total gross assets), asset tangibility (ratio of net fixed assets to total assets), cost of debt (interest before tax / long term debt), profitability (Earnings Before Interest and Taxes (EBIT) / Total Asset), and business risk (standard deviation of EBIT to total assets). The dependent variable in this study, debt capital, is measured by the ratio of long-term debt to total assets. A purposive sampling method is used to select 11 out of 18 textile and garment companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange between 2014 and 2018 that report their annual financial positions. A quantitative method, panel data analysis technique and SPSS tools were also used in this study. Findings – The results show that debt capital is influenced by profitability, while the remaining factors do not influence debt capital. Novelty – This study adds to the existing literature on internal factors, market condition as an external factors, and debt capital in developed countries. The benefit of this study is to explore the potential capabilities of the industry in using its profit to minimize the use of debt as a source of capital to decrease business risk. Type of Paper: Empirical Keywords: Profitability; Growth; Cost of Debt; Business Risk; Tangibility; Capital Structure. Reference to this paper should be made as follows: Ariyln, E., J; Beny; 2019. The Influence of Growth, Asset Tangibility, Cost Of Debt, Profitability and Business Risk On Debt Capital, Acc. Fin. Review 4 (4): 120 – 127 https://doi.org/10.35609/afr.2019.4.4(4) JEL Classification: G23, G32.

Cost of Debt Capital and Audit in Spanish SMEs

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Huguet ◽  
Juan L. Gandía
Keyword(s):  
Cost Of Debt ◽  
Debt Capital

scholarly journals The Cost of Debt Capital Revisited

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rainer Baule
Keyword(s):  
Cost Of Debt ◽  
Debt Capital ◽  
The Cost

scholarly journals The cost of debt capital revisited

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 721-753 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rainer Baule
Keyword(s):  
Cost Of Debt ◽  
Debt Capital ◽  
The Cost

The 2008–2009 global financial crisis and the cost of debt capital among SMEs: Swedish evidence

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Darush Yazdanfar ◽  
Peter Öhman
Keyword(s):  
Financial Crisis ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Global Financial Crisis ◽  
Dynamic Panel Data ◽  
Cost Of Debt ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Debt Capital ◽  
Using Data ◽  
The Cost

PurposeThe main purpose of this study is to describe and analyse the relationship between the 2008–2009 global financial crisis and small and medium-sized enterprises' cost of debt capital.Design/methodology/approachStatistical methods, including multiple OLS and dynamic panel data, were used to analyse a longitudinal cross-sectional panel dataset of 3865 Swedish SMEs operating in five industry sectors over the 2008–2015 period.FindingsThe results suggest that the cost of debt was influenced by the financial crisis and another macroeconomic factor, i.e. the interbank interest rate, and by firm-specific factors such as firm size and lagged cost of debt.Originality/valueTo the authors' best knowledge, this is one of few studies to examine the cost of debt among SMEs during the crisis and post-crisis periods using data from a large-scale, longitudinal, cross-sectional database.

Labor Union and Cost of Debt Capital

2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 233-255
Author(s):  
고영우 ◽  
이세철
Keyword(s):  
Labor Union ◽  
Cost Of Debt ◽  
Debt Capital

Cost of debt capital and audit in Spanish SMEs

2014 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 266-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Huguet ◽  
Juan L. Gandía
Keyword(s):  
Cost Of Debt ◽  
Debt Capital

scholarly journals Analysis of the structure and cost of capital in mining enterprises

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Ranosz
Keyword(s):  
Capital Structure ◽  
Cost Of Capital ◽  
Cost Of Debt ◽  
Cost Of Equity ◽  
Mining Company ◽  
Optimal Capital Structure ◽  
Mining Companies ◽  
Debt Capital ◽  
Capital Funding ◽  
The Cost

AbstractThis article focuses on the analysis of the structure and cost of capital in mining companies. Proper selection of appropriate levels of equity and debt capital funding of investment has a significant impact on its value. Thus, to maximize the value of the company, the capital structure of the company should be composed to minimize the weighted average cost of capital. T he objective of the article is to present the capital structure of selected Polish and world’s mining companies and estimate their cost of equity and debt capital. In the paper the optimal capital structure for the Polish mining company (KGHM SA) was also estimated. It was assumed that both Polish and world’s mining companies, have no debt exceeding 45% in the financing structure. For the most of analyzed cases, the level of financing with debt capital is in the range between 10% and 35%. T he cost of equity exceeds the cost of debt capital and is in the range between 8% and 20%, while the cost of debt capital reaches the range between 1.9% and 12%. T he analysis of the optimal capital structure determining, performed for the selected mining company, showed that debt capital funding for the company should be in the range between 5.7% and 7.4%.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document