Pipes: A Theory of Private vs. Public Placements in Public Firms

Author(s):  
Marc Martos-Vila
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitrios Gounopoulos ◽  
Georgios Loukopoulos ◽  
Panagiotis Loukopoulos

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-26
Author(s):  
Jeffrey L. Callen ◽  
Xiaohua Fang ◽  
Baohua Xin ◽  
Wenjun Zhang

SUMMARY This study examines the association between the office size of engagement auditors and their clients' future stock price crash risk, a consequence of managerial bad news hoarding. Using a sample of U.S. public firms with Big 4 auditors, we find robust evidence that local audit office size is significantly and negatively related to future stock price crash risk. The evidence is consistent with the view that large audit offices effectively detect and deter bad news hoarding activities in comparison with their smaller counterparts. We further explore two possible explanations for these findings, the Auditor Incentive Channel and the Auditor Competency Channel. Our empirical tests offer support for both channels. JEL Classifications: G12; G34; M49.


2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 1527-1577
Author(s):  
PETER ILIEV ◽  
MICHELLE LOWRY

2010 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 1253-1278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Fink ◽  
Kristin E. Fink ◽  
Gustavo Grullon ◽  
James P. Weston

AbstractAggregate idiosyncratic volatility spiked nearly fivefold during the Internet boom of the late 1990s, dwarfing in magnitude a moderately increasing trend. While some researchers argue that this rise in idiosyncratic risk was the result of changes in the characteristics of public firms, others argue that it was driven by the changing sentiment of irrational traders. We present evidence that the marketwide decline in maturity of the typical public firm can explain most of the increase in firm-specific risk during the Internet boom. Controlling for firm maturity, we find no evidence that investor sentiment drives idiosyncratic risk throughout the Internet boom.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document