scholarly journals Exclusion as a Core Competition Concern

Author(s):  
Jonathan B. Baker
Keyword(s):  

1997 ◽  
pp. 377-407
Author(s):  
George Kozmetsky ◽  
Piyu Yue
Keyword(s):  
The Core ◽  




2020 ◽  
pp. 544-582
Author(s):  
Alison Jones ◽  
Christopher Townley

This chapter examines the two core competition rules that govern anti-competitive agreements (Article 101 TFEU) and abuse of a dominant position (Article 102 TFEU). It begins with an overview of EU competition law. It then discusses the enforcement and consequences of infringement; who Articles 101 and 102 TFEU apply to and when they apply. It also identifies anti-competitive agreements and conduct.



Author(s):  
Alison Jones ◽  
Christopher Townley

This chapter examines the two core competition rules that govern anti-competitive agreements (Article 101 TFEU) and abuse of a dominant position (Article 102 TFEU). It begins with an overview of EU competition law. It then discusses the enforcement and consequences of infringement; who Articles 101 and 102 TFEU apply to and when they apply. It also identifies anti-competitive agreements and conduct.





2011 ◽  
Vol 281 ◽  
pp. 243-248
Author(s):  
Qi Lin Wu

This paper introduction of the special function of the technology employees under technology-based economy. Firstly, the paper indicated the importance of the dynamic motivation on technology employees for the enterprise core competition advantage. Secondly, the paper reviewed the relevant motivation theories to the technology employees. Thirdly, the paper analyzed the special needs in different career-life-cycle stages. Fourthly, the paper conceived the hierarchy needs model of the technology employees based on career-life-cycle theory. Finally, the paper made concluded all the paper.



2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 338-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Berg

With linguistics suffering from increasing fractionalization, it is necessary not to lose sight of the overall picture. It seems uncontroversial that the study of language consists of the following five components: processing, use, structure, variation, and change. While some of the relationships between these concepts have been investigated, a systematic integration of these components into a coherent framework is conspicuously missing. A modest attempt is made here to outline such a framework which makes the interrelationships of the components transparent. In all of these components, competition is found to play a key role. At its core, competition is a psycholinguistic effect which arises in the task of selecting an intended unit from among a number of elements concurrently activated in the processing network. The audible and visible outcome of the selection process is language use. Language structure is the prerequisite for competition in that it provides the set of competitors. When competition is low, consistent (i.e., invariant) language use emerges. When competition is high, language use is variable, i.e., synchronic variation occurs. When competition changes over time, language change takes place. Thus, it is language processing in general and competition in particular that constrains and binds together many phenomena of language use, structure, variation, and change.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document