The Emergence of Fundamental Rights: A Game-Changer for the Development of EU Employment Law?

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Daniels
2020 ◽  
pp. 203195252091106
Author(s):  
Niall O’Connor

The decision of the British people to leave the European Union (EU) raises foundational questions for many legal fields. The effects are especially likely to be felt within domestic employment law, which now has a strong basis in EU law. Of particular concern is the removal of the nascent EU fundamental employment rights influence over domestic legislation. Employment lawyers have long relied on fundamental rights as a means of preserving the autonomy of their subject from general private law. One manifestation of this turn to fundamental rights concepts has been the ‘constitutionalisation’ of employment rights. EU law, notably the Charter of Fundamental Rights, has become a key underpinning of this constitutionalisation process. This article considers the effects of the constitutionalisation in the United Kingdom employment sphere of some of the rights found in the Charter’s Solidarity Title, through its role in the emergence of a hierarchy of sources or ‘norms’ in the employment field. In order to address the question of the Charter’s influence on the hierarchy of sources in the employment context, three interrelated processes are examined. The article begins by exploring the ‘constitutionalisation’ process, by setting out the nature of the Charter and the effects of its employment rights on the hierarchy of sources. This is followed by a consideration of the ‘deconstitutionalisation’ process brought about by Brexit, before finally examining whether a potential ‘reconstitutionalisation’ process might be underway by looking at key terms of the EU (Withdrawal) Act 2018 and the potential to replicate the Charter in domestic law.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin D. Brown ◽  
Annapurna Deborah Waughray ◽  
Lalit Khandare ◽  
Kenneth Glenn Dau-Schmidt

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 391-402
Author(s):  
Jeremias Adams-Prassl

‘Social rights’, the late Professor Sir Bob Hepple warned in 2007 ‘are like paper tigers, fierce in appearance but missing in tooth and claw.’ This note sets out to explore the potential of the right to an effective remedy in Article 47 of the European Union’s Charter of Fundamental Rights (‘CFR’) in equipping the Union’s social acquis with credible remedies. Article 47 CFR is one of the most-litigated and important Articles in the Charter. At the same time, however, it has received surprisingly little attention in the context of EU employment law. Discussion is structured as follows: section one explores the rise of the principle of effectiveness, from the early case law of the Court of Justice to the Charter’s entry into force in 2009. Section two sketches the powerful potential of Article 47 CFR, highlighting its utility both in tackling domestic obstacles to effective enforcement, and expanding the horizontal applicability of EU employment law. Section three briefly highlights some of the limitations litigants might encounter, including a general emphasis on broad regulatory discretion for Member States, and the difficult of crafting (positive) duties out of (negative) restraints. A brief concluding section turns to EU law more broadly, as well as the European Convention of Human Rights, for inspirations guiding the potential future development of Article 47 CFR.


Author(s):  
Julia Hörnle

Chapter 13 gathers the insights from the whole book and investigates the parallels between the Jurisdictional Challenge in different areas of law. It argues that the connection between law and territory cannot be easily overcome, as law, technology, and the geo-political system all are independent from each other and changes in technology and law do not necessarily effect changes in the geo-political system. It demonstrates that states essentially cling to their sovereignty and changes in jurisdictional rules only go so far in overcoming the Jurisdictional Challenge. The chapter argues that both rule-level and systemic changes must be sought. It analyses the targeting principle as a possible game changer. As to systemic changes, it discusses first and foremost, international coordination, geo-location, and self-regulation. The chapter finally argues that the greatest challenge is to move towards more pluralistic legal systems without sacrificing the rule of law and fundamental rights.


2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lateef McLeod

Abstract Individuals with significant communication challenges need to communicate across many different venues. The author, from the perspective of an individual who uses AAC, discusses the strengths and weaknesses of both traditional AAC technologies and new mobile AAC technologies. He describes how access to AAC has allowed him to fulfill his dreams as a presenter and writer. He successfully manages a blog in San Francisco, writes grants, and has published his first book of poetry. Not one AAC device fits all of his communication needs; however, access to mobile technology tools has increased his flexibility across environments and given him another successful tool for communication.


2011 ◽  
Vol 44 (20) ◽  
pp. 7
Author(s):  
JULIAN D. “BO” BOBBITT
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document