Constrained Risk Budgeting Portfolios: Theory, Algorithms, Applications & Puzzles

Author(s):  
Jean-Charles Richard ◽  
Thierry Roncalli
Keyword(s):  

2001 ◽  
Vol 2001 (3) ◽  
pp. 38-46
Author(s):  
Wayne A. Kozun






2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (04) ◽  
pp. 503-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
ALFRED GALICHON

I show that the structure of the firm is not neutral with respect to regulatory capital budgeted under rules which are based on the Value-at-Risk. Indeed, when a holding company has the liberty to divide its risk into as many subsidiaries as needed, and when the subsidiaries are subject to capital requirements according to the Value-at-Risk budgeting rule, then there is an optimal way to divide risk which is such that the total amount of capital to be budgeted by the shareholder is zero. This result may lead to regulatory arbitrage by some firms.



Risks ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 86
Author(s):  
Marcos López de Prado ◽  
Ralph Vince ◽  
Qiji Jim Zhu

The Growth-Optimal Portfolio (GOP) theory determines the path of bet sizes that maximize long-term wealth. This multi-horizon goal makes it more appealing among practitioners than myopic approaches, like Markowitz’s mean-variance or risk parity. The GOP literature typically considers risk-neutral investors with an infinite investment horizon. In this paper, we compute the optimal bet sizes in the more realistic setting of risk-averse investors with finite investment horizons. We find that, under this more realistic setting, the optimal bet sizes are considerably smaller than previously suggested by the GOP literature. We also develop quantitative methods for determining the risk-adjusted growth allocations (or risk budgeting) for a given finite investment horizon.



Author(s):  
Martin Haugh ◽  
Garud Iyengar ◽  
Irene Song


2002 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 91-92
Author(s):  
Jot Yau
Keyword(s):  


Author(s):  
Marcos Lopez de Prado ◽  
Ralph Vince ◽  
Qiji Jim Zhu




Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document