Better Access to Better Justice: The Potential of Procedural Reform

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noel Semple
Keyword(s):  
1918 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edwin M. Borchard
Keyword(s):  

1988 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 3-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia W. Ingraham ◽  
B. Guy Peters

Despite obvious cross-national political and cultural differences, civil service reform policies exhibit strong similarities. An examination of reform efforts in the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia emphasizes the centrality of politics and political processes to administrative reform. This is true for mechanical or procedural reform, structural reform and what we termed “relational reforms,” or, reforms aimed at restructuring the relationship between politicians and career civil servants. The overriding influence of politics reduces policy design considerations and often results in solutions that do not match the problems being addressed. The outcomes are new bureaucratic problems and the need for additional reforms.


1915 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 667
Author(s):  
Robert McMurdy
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 49-51
Author(s):  
Evgeniy S. Razdyakonov ◽  
◽  
Igor N. Tarasov ◽  

The article examines some of the results of the procedural reform in terms of the resolution of corporate disputes by courts. The authors formulated four main theses that reflect the essence of this reform: the division of competence in corporate disputes between courts of general jurisdiction and arbitration courts, the expansion of the arbitrability of corporate disputes, the implementation of the principle of one-time consideration of a corporate dispute, the consolidation of new subjects of civil proceedings in corporate disputes not named in the general part of the Commercial Procedure Code of the RF and the Code of Civil Procedure of the RF.


2000 ◽  
pp. 314-363
Author(s):  
Stefan Griller ◽  
Dimitri P. Droutsas ◽  
Katrin Forgó ◽  
Gerda Falkner ◽  
Michael Nentwich
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
pp. 208-232
Author(s):  
Michael Koß

The 1991–2015 period saw both the diminished importance of the traditional anti-system parties of the left (due to the end of Communist rule in Europe) as well as the rise of new populist radical right-wing parties. As a response to the sharp rise of tactical obstruction by loyal opposition parties, the French National Assembly became a hybrid legislature when committees were empowered under centralized agenda control in 2008. With no similar increase of obstruction in the British House of Commons, no substantial procedural reform occurred. In the two working legislatures (the Riksdag and the Bundestag), legislators maintained their preference for work. This explains the procedural path dependence in both legislatures despite the appearance of a potential anti-system party (the Sweden Democrats) in the Riksdag. Given the absence of sustained obstruction by the Sweden Democrats, followers successfully reversed an attempt to informally centralize agenda control in the Riksdag.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document