The Kirchhoff‐Helmholtz formula for the wavefield inside a closed surface surrounding a volume is most commonly given as a surface integral over the field and its normal derivative, given the Green’s function of the problem. In this case the source point of the Green’s function, or the observation point, is located inside the volume enclosed by the surface. However, when locating the observation point outside the closed surface, the Kirchhoff‐Helmholtz formula constitutes a functional relationship between the field and its normal derivative on the surface, and thereby defines an integral equation for the fields. By dividing the closed surface into two parts, one being identical to the (infinite) data measurement surface and the other identical to the (infinite) surface onto which we want to extrapolate the data, the solution of the Kirchhoff‐Helmholtz integral equation mathematically gives exact inverse extrapolation of the field when constructing a Green’s function that generates either a null pressure field or a null normal gradient of the pressure field on the latter surface. In the case when the surfaces are plane and horizontal and the medium parameters are constant between the surfaces, analysis in the wavenumber domain shows that the Kirchhoff‐Helmholtz integral equation is equivalent to the Thomson‐Haskell acoustic propagator matrix method. When the medium parameters have smooth vertical gradients, the Kirchhoff‐Helmholtz integral equation in the high‐frequency approximation is equivalent to the WKBJ propagator matrix method, which also is equivalent to the extrapolation method denoted by extrapolation by analytic continuation.
Empirical modelling for work piece temperature during end milling of inconel 625 using a green’s function approach based on dirac delta function