Strategy-Proofness Implies Minimal Participation Under Single-Peakedness

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clemens Puppe
Keyword(s):  
Single Peakedness ◽  
Strategy Proofness

scholarly journals Strategy-proofness and single-peakedness

Public Choice ◽  
1976 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Marie Blin ◽  
Mark A. Satterthwaite
Keyword(s):  
Single Peakedness ◽  
Strategy Proofness

scholarly journals ON STRATEGY-PROOFNESS AND THE SALIENCE OF SINGLE-PEAKEDNESS

2018 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 163-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shurojit Chatterji ◽  
Jordi Massó
Keyword(s):  
Single Peakedness ◽  
Strategy Proofness

scholarly journals On Strategy-proofness and the Salience of Single-peakedness in a Private Goods Economy

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shurojit Chatterji ◽  
Jordi Massó Carreras ◽  
Shigehiro Serizawa
Keyword(s):  
Private Goods ◽  
Single Peakedness ◽  
Strategy Proofness

On strategy-proofness and single peakedness

Public Choice ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 437-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Moulin
Keyword(s):  
Single Peakedness ◽  
Strategy Proofness

scholarly journals On strategy-proofness and semilattice single-peakedness

2020 ◽  
Vol 124 ◽  
pp. 219-238
Author(s):  
Agustín G. Bonifacio ◽  
Jordi Massó
Keyword(s):  
Single Peakedness ◽  
Strategy Proofness

scholarly journals On strategy-proofness and single-peakedness: median-voting over intervals

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 1059-1080
Author(s):  
Bettina Klaus ◽  
Panos Protopapas
Keyword(s):  
Public Choice ◽  
Counter Example ◽  
Single Peakedness ◽  
Generalized Median ◽  
Strategy Proofness

AbstractWe study correspondences that choose an interval of alternatives when agents have single-peaked preferences over locations and ordinally extend their preferences over intervals. We extend the main results of Moulin (Public Choice 35:437–455, 1980) to our setting and show that the results of Ching (Soc Choice Welf 26:473–490, 1997) cannot always be similarly extended. First, strategy-proofness and peaks-onliness characterize the class of generalized median correspondences (Theorem 1). Second, this result neither holds on the domain of symmetric and single-peaked preferences, nor can in this result min/max continuity substitute peaks-onliness (see counter-Example 3). Third, strategy-proofness and voter-sovereignty characterize the class of efficient generalized median correspondences (Theorem 2).

scholarly journals On obvious strategy-proofness and single-peakedness

2020 ◽  
Vol 186 ◽  
pp. 104992
Author(s):  
R. Pablo Arribillaga ◽  
Jordi Massó ◽  
Alejandro Neme
Keyword(s):  
Single Peakedness ◽  
Strategy Proofness

scholarly journals On strategy-proofness and symmetric single-peakedness

2011 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
pp. 467-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordi Massó ◽  
Inés Moreno de Barreda
Keyword(s):  
Single Peakedness ◽  
Strategy Proofness

Single-peakedness and strategy-proofness of generalized median voter schemes

2002 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 175-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dolors Berga
Keyword(s):  
Median Voter ◽  
Single Peakedness ◽  
Generalized Median ◽  
Strategy Proofness
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document