scholarly journals Financial Intermediaries, Ownership Structure and the Provision of Venture Capital to Smes: Evidence from Japan

Author(s):  
Douglas J. Cumming ◽  
Armin Schwienbacher ◽  
Grant Alan Fleming
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 129
Author(s):  
Houda Dziri ◽  
Anis Jarboui

The present research work’s major objective lies in investigating the scope of the venture capitalist’ cognitive contribution following their financial participation in the company's capital. Conducted on a sample of 70 Tunisian venture capital funded firms, operating up the year 2015, the survey reached findings have proved to reveal well the significant impact this financial intermediation mode appears to have on kindling cognitive resources, in its association with the contractor. Noteworthy, however, is that the cognitive contribution has been discovered to be constrained, in turn, by the venture capital organization’s proper ownership structure.


2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 7-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amina Hamdouni

The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of ownership structure and board structure on performance in VC-backed firms. Using 106 French VC-backed firms, our methodology in this paper is to estimate four equations. A regression analysis is then used to study the impact of ownership structure and board structure on performance and also to analyze whether ownership structure (ownership concentration, director ownership, venture capital ownership and employee ownership) and board variables (size, outside directors, COE-chairman duality, proportion of VC directors, proportion of employee directors and board meeting frequency) are significant determinants of VC-backed firm performance. Results indicate a strong positive relation between ownership concentration and performance and between director ownership and performance measured by ROE. And strong negative relation between ownership concentration and performance and between director ownership and performance measured by ROA. No strong relation was found between venture-capital ownership, employee ownership and firm performance. Results show also a strong negative relation between board size and performance measured by ROE and positive relation between board size and performance measured by ROA, Tobin’s Q and MVA. The proportion of independent outside directors on the board was positively associated with ROE and negatively associated with ROA. The presence of a dual leadership structure is negatively associated with ROE and positively associated with ROA. No strong relation was found between the proportion of venture-capital in board, the presence of employee in board, or board meeting frequency and firm performance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document