Supersymmetric field theories and the elliptic index theorem with complex coefficients

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 2287-2384
Author(s):  
Daniel Berwick-Evans
1988 ◽  
Vol 305 (3) ◽  
pp. 483-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hermann Nicolai ◽  
Ergin Sezgin ◽  
Yoshiaki Tanii

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. G. Faux ◽  
K. M. Iga ◽  
G. D. Landweber

We explain how the representation theory associated with supersymmetry in diverse dimensions is encoded within the representation theory of supersymmetry in one time-like dimension. This is enabled by algebraic criteria, derived, exhibited, and utilized in this paper, which indicate which subset of one-dimensional supersymmetric models describes “shadows” of higher-dimensional models. This formalism delineates that minority of one-dimensional supersymmetric models which can “enhance” to accommodate extra dimensions. As a consistency test, we use our formalism to reproduce well-known conclusions about supersymmetric field theories using one-dimensional reasoning exclusively. And we introduce the notion of “phantoms” which usefully accommodate higher-dimensional gauge invariance in the context of shadow multiplets in supersymmetric quantum mechanics.


2004 ◽  
Vol 19 (25) ◽  
pp. 4231-4249 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. A. BICHL ◽  
M. ERTL ◽  
A. GERHOLD ◽  
J. M. GRIMSTRUP ◽  
L. POPP ◽  
...  

The quantization of the noncommutative [Formula: see text], U(1) super-Yang–Mills action is performed in the superfield formalism. We calculate the one-loop corrections to the self-energy of the vector superfield. Although the power-counting theorem predicts quadratic ultraviolet and infrared divergences, there are actually only logarithmic UV and IR divergences, which is a crucial feature of noncommutative supersymmetric field theories.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Di Pietro ◽  
Michael Dine ◽  
Zohar Komargodski

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document