scholarly journals Comparison of brain monoamine content in three populations of Lymnaea that correlates with taste-aversive learning ability

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (0) ◽  
pp. 129-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hitoshi Aonuma ◽  
Yuki Totani ◽  
Manabu Sakakibara ◽  
Ken Lukowiak ◽  
Etsuro Ito
2010 ◽  
Vol 479 (2) ◽  
pp. 112-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Llorente ◽  
Esther O'Shea ◽  
M. Dolores Gutierrez-Lopez ◽  
Alvaro Llorente-Berzal ◽  
María Isabel Colado ◽  
...  

Diabetes ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 481-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. C. Chu ◽  
M. T. Lin ◽  
L. R. Shian ◽  
S. Y. Leu

Xenobiotica ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 1131-1138 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Coudray-lucas ◽  
A. Le Guen ◽  
M. Prioux-guyonneau ◽  
Y. Cohen ◽  
J. Wepierre

2009 ◽  
Vol 57 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 687-693 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aygul Balcioglu ◽  
Jia-Qian Ren ◽  
Deirdre McCarthy ◽  
Thomas J. Spencer ◽  
Joseph Biederman ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Hossein Kishani Farahani ◽  
Ahmad Ashouri ◽  
Pouria Abroon ◽  
Jean-Sebastien Pierre ◽  
Joan van Baaren

Upon encountering a host, a female parasitoid wasp has to decide whether to learn positive or negative cues related to a host. The optimal female decision will depend on the fitness costs and benefits of learned stimuli. Reward quality is positively related to the rate of behavioral acquisition in processes such as associative learning. Wolbachia, an endosymbiotic bacterium, often plays an impressive role in the manipulation of its arthropod host's biology. Here we studied the responses of two natural Wolbachia infected/uninfected Trichogramma brassicae populations to theoretically high- and low- reward values during a conditioning process and the consequences of their responses in terms of memory duration. According to our results, uninfected wasps showed an attraction response to high value rewards, but showed aversive learning in response to low value rewards. Memory span of uninfected wasps after conditioning by low-value rewards was significantly shorter compared to high-value rewards. As our results revealed, responses to high quality hosts will bring more benefits (bigger size, increased fecundity and enhanced survival) compared to low-quality hosts for uninfected wasps. Infected wasps were attracted to conditioned stimuli with the same memory duration after conditioning by both types of hosts. This was linked to the fact that parasitoids emerging from both types of hosts present the same life-history traits. Therefore, these hosts represent the same quality reward for infected wasps. According to obtained results it can be concluded that Wolbachia manipulates the learning ability of its host resulting in the wasp responding to all reward values similarly.


Author(s):  
Elizabeth M. Burns ◽  
Thomas W. Kruckeberg ◽  
Paul K. Gaetano ◽  
James Q. Kissane ◽  
Lynn E. Comerford

Diabetes ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 481-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. C. Chu ◽  
M. T. Lin ◽  
L. R. Shian ◽  
S. Y. Leu

1978 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eila Jeronen ◽  
Maua-Liisa Peura ◽  
R. Hissa

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominic Mason ◽  
Susanne Zajitschek ◽  
Hamza Anwer ◽  
Rose E O’Dea ◽  
Daniel Hesselson ◽  
...  

AbstractAversive learning – avoiding certain situations based on negative experiences – can profoundly increase fitness in animal species. The extent to which this cognitive mechanism could evolve depends upon individual differences in aversive learning being stable through time, and heritable across generations, yet no published study has quantified the stability of individual differences in aversive learning using the repeatability statistic, R (also known as the intra-class correlation). We assessed the repeatability of aversive learning by conditioning approximately 100 zebrafish (Danio rerio) to avoid a colour cue associated with a mild electric shock. Across eight different colour conditions zebrafish did not show consistent individual differences in aversive learning (R = 0.04). Within conditions, when zebrafish were twice conditioned to the same colour, blue conditioning was more repeatable than green conditioning (R = 0.15 and R = 0.02). In contrast to the low repeatability estimates for aversive learning, zebrafish showed moderately consistent individual differences in colour preference during the baseline period (i.e. prior to aversive conditioning; R ~ 0.45). Overall, aversive learning responses of zebrafish were weak and variable (difference in time spent near the aversive cue <6 seconds per minute), but individual differences in learning ability did not explain substantial variability. We speculate that either the effect of aversive learning was too weak to quantify consistent individual differences, or directional selection might have eroded additive genetic variance. Finally, we discuss how confounded repeatability assays and publication bias could have inflated average estimates of repeatability in animal behaviour publications.Summary StatementZebrafish exhibit low repeatability (intra-class correlation) in an aversive learning assay possibly due to past selection pressure exhausting genetic variance in this learning trait.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document