Abstract
Introduction
Ward rounds are essential in assessing and planning patient care, but they are often subject to variable quality and structure. A ward round checklist could improve documentation and patient safety.
Method
We performed a closed-loop audit with a different novel ward round checklist in each audit, the second made from improving the first, based on feedback. We looked at checklist utilisation, and the quality of documentation in notes. We compared the quality of documentation in notes with the checklist, to notes without the checklist. The data was then collated and analysed. Standards from the Royal College of Physicians’ “Ward Rounds in Medicine”.
Results
In the first audit, our sample was 68, in the second, it was 64. With the use of a checklist (M = 67%, SD = 22%) documentation was significantly better than without (M = 26%, SD = 10%), t(64)=8.85, p<.00001. Ward documentation was especially improved regarding fluid balance, analgesia, and assessing physiotherapy needs. The second version of the checklist (M = 56%, SD = 28%) was used significantly more than the first checklist (M = 13%, SD = 22%), t(75)=7.59, p<.00001.
Conclusions
With the growing role of clinical notes as a legal document, a tool for handover, and a pillar of care planning, improving the quality of the documentation is imperative. This study shows that a systematic checklist significantly improves ward round documentation, which has already established in an improvement in clinical care. We hope to follow-up this study with a third audit, focusing on patient satisfaction and determining reduction in harm caused to patients with a ward round checklist.
The surgical ward round checklist: improving patient safety and clinical documentation
