Clinical Efficacy of Sonic Fill Composite versus Conventional Composites in Class II Cavities in Primary Molars

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 375-381
Author(s):  
Kaddor W ◽  
Baiomy S ◽  
Barakat I
2009 ◽  
Vol 140 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Márcia Pereira Alves dos Santos ◽  
Mariana Passos ◽  
Ronir Raggio Luiz ◽  
Lucianne Cople Maia

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. S16
Author(s):  
Tariq Akkam ◽  
Feras Masha ◽  
Mohammed Dhae ◽  
Abdulrahman Sherwani ◽  
Satish Vishwanathaiah ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 228-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. P. J. M. Boon ◽  
N. L. Visser ◽  
A. M. Kemoli ◽  
W. E. van Amerongen
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 264-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eliyahu Tal ◽  
Ari Kupietzky ◽  
Anna B Fuks ◽  
Nili Tickotsky ◽  
Moti Moskovitz

Objectives: The present preliminary study evaluated the clinical and radiographic performances of heat-cured high viscosity glass ionomer (HCHVGI) in class II restorations of primary molars. Study design: A retrospective study on a cohort of patients who had dental caries restored at a private practice was conducted. Restorations were evaluated radiographically and photographically by two separate examiners. Results: Ninety-three Class II restorations in 44 patients (average age: 108 months ± 25.3, 24 males, 20 females) were examined. Average recall time was 22.2 months ± 4.2. All but three restorations (96.8%) were present and intact, with no incidents of secondary caries. Three additional restorations had occlusal defects that required retreatment, resulting in an overall success rate of 93.5%. Ninety-seven percent of the restorations were rated optimal for marginal integrity with no staining of the restoration surfaces. No patients complained of post-operative sensitivity. The most common flaw found was a concavity on the proximal wall of the cavity box (27%, mean age 16 months ± 3.9). Conclusion: The findings in this preliminary study suggest that heat cured high viscosity glass ionomer cement may be an effective restorative material for Class II restorations in primary molars that are a year or two from shedding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document