Role of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Mapping in Assessment of Therapeutic Response of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Post Trans-Catheter Arterial Chemoembolization

Aim: The goal of this meta-analysis was to assess the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) as a pre- and posttreatment (ΔADC) predictive imaging biomarker of response to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: SCOPUS database, EMBASE database and MEDLINE library were scanned for connections between pre- and posttreatment ADC values of HCC and response to TACE. Six studies qualified for inclusion. The following parameters were collected: authors, publication year, study design, number of patients, drugs for TACE, mean ADC value, standard deviation, measure method, b-values and Tesla-strength. The QUADAS-2 instrument was employed to check the methodological quality of each study. The meta-analysis was performed by utilizing RevMan 5.3 software. DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models with inverse-variance were used to regard heterogeneity. Mean ADC values and 95% confidence intervals were computed. Results: Six studies (n=271 patients with 293 HCC nodules) were included. The pretreatment mean ADC in the responder group was 1.20 x 10-3 mm2/s (0.98, 1.42) and 1.14 x 10-3 mm2/s (0.89, 1.39) in the non-responder group. The analysis of post TACE ADC value changes (ΔADC) revealed a threshold of ≥ 20% to identify treatment responders. No suitable pretreatment ADC threshold to predict therapy response or discriminate between responders and non-responders before therapy could be discovered. Conclusion: ΔADC can facilitate early objective response evaluation through post-therapeutic ADC alterations ≥ 20%. Pretreatment ADC cannot predict response to TACE.

Download Full-text

Pretreatment Apparent Diffusion Coefficient as a Predictor of Response to Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Immediately Combined with Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Solitary Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Cancer Management and Research ◽

10.2147/cmar.s270470 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol Volume 12 ◽

pp. 10127-10138

Author(s):

Jing Tang ◽

Fengyong Liu ◽

Hongjun Yuan ◽

Xin Li ◽

Xiaomei Tian ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽

Diffusion Coefficient ◽

Radiofrequency Ablation ◽

Apparent Diffusion Coefficient ◽

Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization ◽

Apparent Diffusion ◽

Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽

Arterial Chemoembolization

Download Full-text

Apparent diffusion coefficient for differentiating between benign and malignant hepatic focal lesions

Egyptian Liver Journal ◽

10.1186/s43066-020-00068-2 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 10 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Sherif Abugamra ◽

Aya Yassin ◽

Asmaa Saber Mostafa Abdel-Rehim ◽

Dina Sayed Sheha

Keyword(s):

Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽

Diffusion Coefficient ◽

Apparent Diffusion Coefficient ◽

Focal Lesion ◽

Benign Lesions ◽

Focal Lesions ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Apparent Diffusion ◽

Malignant Lesions ◽

The Mean

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the role of diffusion weight MRI (DWI) in the characterization of hepatic focal lesions by using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Thirty patients (18 women, 12 men; mean age 48.5 years) with hepatic focal lesions were included in this study. Patients underwent DW MR imaging with the SPLICE sequence. ADC of each focal lesion carcinoma was calculated from DW MR Images obtained with low and high b values. ADCs were compared among pathological types of focal lesions. Results Among the 30 patients included in the study, 46 focal lesions were detected. Twenty-four lesions were metastatic lesions from primary cancer, 7 lesions were hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 9 lesions were hemangiomas, and 6 lesions were simple cysts. There was highly significant difference between the mean ADC of the malignant lesions (metastasis and HCC) and the mean ADC of benign lesions (hemangiomas and cysts). The ADC of malignant lesion was much less than that of benign lesion. The mean ADC of malignant lesions (n = 31) was 0.73 ± 0.19 × 10−3 mm2/s, and the mean ADC of benign lesions (n = 15) was 1.94 ± 0.68 × 10−3 mm2/s (p value < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the cysts and hemangiomas. There was no statistically significant difference between the metastases and hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusion ADCs values were able to differentiate benign from malignant lesions. ADC should be considered in the work up of patients with hepatic focal lesions.

Download Full-text