The Outcome of thoracic endovascular aortic repair in patients with thoracic aortic diseases

2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Atef Saleh ◽  
Mohammed Aboleineen ◽  
ELsayed Farag ◽  
Hamdy soliman
2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 574-582
Author(s):  
Amit Iyengar ◽  
Nicholas J Goel ◽  
John J Kelly ◽  
Jason Han ◽  
Chase R Brown ◽  
...  

Abstract OBJECTIVES The introduction and expansion of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) have revolutionized the treatment of a variety of thoracic aortic diseases. We sought to evaluate the incidence, causes, predictors and costs associated with 30-day readmission after TEVAR in a nationally representative cohort. METHODS Adult patients undergoing isolated TEVAR were identified in the National Readmissions Database from 2010 to 2014. Hospital costs were estimated by converting individual hospital charge data adjusted to 2014 consumer price indices. Multivariable logistic regression was utilized to determine hospital- and patient-level factors associated with readmissions. RESULTS A total of 24 983 TEVARs were noted during the study period; the average age of the patients was 65 ± 16 years; 40% were women. The most common indication was an intact thoracic aneurysm (43.5%), followed by aortic dissection (30.5%). The average cost of the index admission was $63 644 ± $52 312; the average hospital stay was 11 ± 14 days; the index mortality rate was 6.7%. Readmissions within 30 days occurred in 17.4% of patients. Indications for readmission were varied; the most common aetiologies were cardiac (17.8%), infectious (16.0%) and pulmonary (12.1%). On multivariable analysis, the strongest predictor of readmission was the diagnosis, with a ruptured thoraco-abdominal aneurysm having the highest readmission burden (adjusted odds ratio 2.23, 1.17–4.24; P = 0.015). Notably, hospital volume did not predict index hospital length of stay, costs or 30-day readmissions (all P > 0.10). CONCLUSIONS Annual TEVAR volume was not associated with any of the outcomes assessed. Rather, indication for TEVAR was the strongest predictor for many outcomes. As TEVAR becomes increasingly utilized, a focus on cardiac and vascular diseases may reduce readmissions and improve quality of care.


2018 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamdy Soliman ◽  
Mohammed N. El-Ganainy ◽  
Reham M. Darweesh ◽  
Sameh Bakhoum ◽  
Mohammed Abdel-Ghany

2018 ◽  
Vol 121 (8) ◽  
pp. e113-e114
Author(s):  
Mohammed Elganainy ◽  
Hamdy Soliman ◽  
Reham Darweesh ◽  
Sameh Bakhoum ◽  
Mohammed Abdel Ghany

2011 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 123-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brant W. Ullery ◽  
Grace J. Wang ◽  
David Low ◽  
Albert T. Cheung

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has decreased the morbidity and mortality associated with open surgical repair of descending thoracic aortic diseases, but important complications unique to the procedure remain. Spinal cord ischemia and infarction is a recognized complication caused by endovascular coverage or injury to spinal cord collateral vessels. Stroke is a consequence of thromboembolism or coverage of aortic arch branch vessels with insufficient collateral circulation. Understanding the risk factors and the pathophysiology of neurological complications of TEVAR are important for the successful anesthetic and surgical management and treatment of patients undergoing endovascular procedures involving the thoracic aorta.


2018 ◽  
Vol 100 (8) ◽  
pp. 662-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
GJS Tan ◽  
PLZ Khoo ◽  
KMJ Chan

Introduction The development of thoracic endovascular aortic repair has altered the approach and reduced the risk of treating the majority of descending thoracic aortic conditions. Primarily developed for the exclusion of thoracic aortic aneurysms, it is now used in place of open repair surgery for most descending thoracic aortic diseases, and has also been used to treat aortic arch diseases in selected cases. Methods A literature search was conducted of Medline and Embase databases from January 2007 to February 2017, using the key words ‘aortic disease’, ‘thoracic aorta’ and ‘endovascular repair’; 205 articles were identified, of which 25 studies were selected for review based on their relevance. Findings The key findings of the indications, techniques, outcomes, complications and comparisons with open surgical repair were extracted from the published studies and are summarised in this review. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair is the preferred choice of intervention for patients with descending thoracic aortic disease. With time, it has improved to be safer and has the potential to expand aortic treatment choices in future.


Author(s):  
Chun-Ku Chen ◽  
Hsiao-Ping Chou ◽  
Ying-Yueh Chang ◽  
Chun-Che Shih

Aortic morphology is associated with age, with the diameter being larger in older people. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is a treatment for aortic diseases, such as aortic dissection. When evaluating patients, aortic elongation could interfere with the classification of TEVAR complications. The longitudinal change in aortic length has not been studied in detail. In patients receiving thoracic endovascular aortic repair between 2007 and 2013, we determined the aortic length between the sinotubular junction, left common carotid artery, subclavian artery, and celiac artery on their first five annual follow-up computed tomography (CT) exams. Using the immediate post-TEVAR follow-up CT as the comparison reference and a lengthening of the aortic segment by 10 mm or more as the definition of elongation, 16 of 41 (39%) showed elongation between the innominate artery and celiac artery. When compared with the immediate follow-up CT, a higher proportion of patients showed elongation at the fifth year’s follow-up CT than the first year’s follow-up CT (p < 0.01), and the average lengthening per year was 1.7 mm. There was progressive lengthening of the aorta after TEVAR.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document