scholarly journals Preliminary assessment of the BREST reactor design and fuel cycle concept.

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Khalil ◽  
J E Lineberry ◽  
J E Cahalan ◽  
J L Willit ◽  
B W Spencer ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Pierre Berbey ◽  
Franc¸ois Hedin ◽  
Luc VanHoenacker

In 2007–2008, the European Utility Requirements (EUR) works have been focused on volume 3 (evaluation of the available Gen 3 designs) and volume 4 (conventional island). The works on the AP1000 and AES92 subsets of the EUR volume 3 have been concluded at the end of 2007. The texts have been published and are now available for the EUR members and other utilities. The works on the EPR subset of volume 3 have resumed in 2007. A revision B is being produced for which representatives from ten EUR utilities and from Areva NP have been involved in the revision of the analysis of compliance. Meetings of the specific EUR coordination group in charge of this task have been organized every 4–5 weeks throughout 2008. The revised version of the EPR subset of the EUR volume 3 should be finalized around mid 2009. The revision C of the EUR volume 4 is now available after a thorough review has been performed within the EUR organization to make it consistent with the revision C of the EUR volume 2 published in 2001. A lot of preparatory material for a possible revision D of the EUR volumes 1 and 2 has been produced since 2002. Since important contributions are not yet available the decision to integrate this revision D is still to come. The EUR organization has kept enlarging: Energoatom, ENEL and Endesa have been welcomed as full members; CEZ and MVM are now EUR associated members. New LWR projects of potential interest for the EUR utilities are being contemplated. For instance a preliminary assessment of compliance of MHI’s APWR project has been worked out in the first months of 2008. Recently the EUR and ENISS organizations have decided to join their efforts in a collaboration scheme in which they will coordinate their positions and actions in nuclear safety with respect to the LWR Gen3 designs. The two organizations will cooperate in their relations with the other stakeholders, in particular with the IAEA and WENRA organizations. In addition EUR and CORDEL (Cooperation in Reactor Design Evaluation and Licensing), which is a WNA (World Nuclear Association) working group decided also to coordinate their efforts for the industry benefit, in relation with the MDEP (Multinational Design Evaluation Program) initiative of safety nuclear regulators.



2008 ◽  
Vol 50 (2-6) ◽  
pp. 129-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ehud Greenspan ◽  
Ser Gi Hong ◽  
Ki Bog Lee ◽  
Lanfranco Monti ◽  
Tsuyoshi Okawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  


Author(s):  
V. S. Bezzubtsev ◽  
V. S. Emelyanov ◽  
B. A. Gabaraev ◽  
V. M. Poplavsky ◽  
A. V. Vatulin ◽  
...  


2018 ◽  
Vol 119 ◽  
pp. 396-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin R. Betzler ◽  
Sean Robertson ◽  
Eva E. Davidson (née Sunny) ◽  
Jeffrey J. Powers ◽  
Andrew Worrall ◽  
...  


1997 ◽  
Vol 117 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Galperin ◽  
Gilad Raizes


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean Robertson ◽  
Leslie Dewan ◽  
Mark Massie ◽  
Eva E. Davidson ◽  
Benjamin R. Betzler ◽  
...  


2009 ◽  
Vol 161 (3) ◽  
pp. 289-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonid Golyand ◽  
Eugene Shwageraus ◽  
Yigal Ronen


Atomic Energy ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 103 (1) ◽  
pp. 501-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. G. Glazov ◽  
V. N. Leonov ◽  
V. V. Orlov ◽  
A. G. Sila-Novitskii ◽  
V. S. Smirnov ◽  
...  


1984 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 267-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harriet B. Klein

Formal articulation test responses are often used by the busy clinician as a basis for planning intervention goals. This article describes a 6-step procedure for using efficiently the single-word responses elicited with an articulation test. This procedure involves the assessment of all consonants within a word rather than only test-target consonants. Responses are organized within a Model and Replica chart to yield information about an individual's (a) articulation ability, (b) frequency of target attainment, substitutions, and deletions, (c) variability in production, and (d) phonological processes. This procedure is recommended as a preliminary assessment measure. It is advised that more detailed analysis of continuous speech be undertaken in conjunction with early treatment sessions.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document