scholarly journals Novel Protein-oligonucleotide Conjugation Method Involving a High-affinity Capture HaloTag

BIO-PROTOCOL ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Junshi Yazaki
2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (10) ◽  
pp. 3072-3088 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theresa M. Russell ◽  
Louis S. Green ◽  
Taylor Rice ◽  
Nicole A. Kruh-Garcia ◽  
Karen Dobos ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTDirect pathogen detection in blood to diagnose active tuberculosis (TB) has been difficult due to low levels of circulating antigens or due to the lack of specific, high-affinity binding reagents and reliable assays with adequate sensitivity. We sought to determine whether slow off-rate modified aptamer (SOMAmer) reagents with subnanomolar affinity forMycobacterium tuberculosisproteins (antigens 85A, 85B, 85C, GroES, GroEL2, DnaK, CFP10, KAD, CFP2, RplL, and Tpx) could be useful to diagnose tuberculosis. When incorporated into the multiplexed, array-based proteomic SOMAscan assay, limits of detection reached the subpicomolar range in 40% serum. Binding to nativeM. tuberculosisproteins was confirmed by usingM. tuberculosisculture filtrate proteins and fractions from infected macrophages and via affinity capture assays and subsequent mass spectrometry. Comparison of serum from culture-positive pulmonary TB patients and TB suspects systematically ruled out for TB revealed small but statistically significant (P< 0.0001) differences in the medianM. tuberculosissignals and in specific pathogen markers, such as antigen 85B. Samples where manyM. tuberculosisaptamers produced high signals were rare exceptions. In concentrated, protein-normalized urine from TB patients and non-TB controls, the CFP10 (EsxB) SOMAmer yielded the most significant differential signals (P< 0.0276), particularly in TB patients with HIV coinfection. In conclusion, directM. tuberculosisantigen detection proved difficult even with a sensitive method such as SOMAscan, likely due to their very low, subpicomolar abundance. The observed differences between cases and controls had limited diagnostic utility in serum and urine, but further evaluation ofM. tuberculosisSOMAmers using other platforms and sample types is warranted.


2008 ◽  
Vol 283 (50) ◽  
pp. 35129-35139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse Donovan ◽  
Kelvin Caban ◽  
Ruchira Ranaweera ◽  
Jonathan N. Gonzalez-Flores ◽  
Paul R. Copeland

2005 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 259-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
X. L. Kong ◽  
L. C. L. Huang ◽  
C.-M. Hsu ◽  
W.-H. Chen ◽  
C.-C. Han ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 20 (19) ◽  
pp. 2954-2960 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Rainer ◽  
Najam-ul-Haq Muhammad ◽  
Christian W. Huck ◽  
Isabel Feuerstein ◽  
Rania Bakry ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 251-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacqueline L Naffin ◽  
Ying Han ◽  
Hernando J Olivos ◽  
M.Muralidhar Reddy ◽  
Tingwan Sun ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document