scholarly journals Managing Atrophic Maxilla Using Ridge-Split Technique: a Review Based Analysis with two case Reports

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 01-07
Author(s):  
Khalid Al Hamdan
Keyword(s):  
Case Reports ◽  
Atrophic Maxilla ◽  
Ridge Split ◽  
Split Technique

scholarly journals Alveolar ridge split technique and immediate implant placement in atrophic maxilla. Case series

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (S20) ◽  
pp. 297-297
Author(s):  
Maria Eleni Oikonomou ◽  
Agamemno Chliaoutakis ◽  
Konstantinos Samanidis ◽  
Anthi Papachristodima ◽  
Georgios Ntagiantis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Series ◽  
Alveolar Ridge ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Atrophic Maxilla ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
Ridge Split ◽  
Split Technique

scholarly journals Management of the Athrofic Maxilar Crest with the Ridge Split Technique

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-29
Author(s):  
Britto Falcón-Guerrero DDS, MDS, PhD
Keyword(s):  
Dental Implants ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Horizontal Direction ◽  
Case Presentation ◽  
Atrophic Maxilla ◽  
Successful Technique ◽  
Ridge Split ◽  
Split Technique ◽  
Maxillary Sinuses

Introduction: the bony atrophy of the maxillary ridge is always a limitation to install dental implants. The Ridge Split procedure proves to be a successful technique to perform the management of horizontal defects, increasing the dimensions of the atrophic ridge to immediately install dental implants. Aim: to describe the clinical use of the Ridge Split technique as a treatment for bone augmentation in the horizontal direction of the atrophic maxilla. Case presentation: the case of a female patient of 61 years of age, partially edentulous, who seeks to recover her upper teeth was presented. The clinical examination shows only two teeth and the radiographic-tomographic examination showed severe bone resorption and pneumatization of the maxillary sinuses. It is planned to install two implants to make an over denture, using the Ridge Split technique and immediate installation of the implants. Five months later, a tomographic control was performed evidencing a horizontal increase of the alveolar ridge and it was rehabilitated with an overdenture, with which the patient's aesthetic and functional compliance was achieved. Conclusion: the presented case reveals that this technique increases the bone ridge in horizontal direction and allows to install the implants simultaneously. It is a predictable, safe and comfortable treatment, and shortens the treatment time, making it a viable alternative for the management of alveolar bone defects.

Reconstruction of atrophic maxilla through Le Fort I Osteotomy and Calvarial Bone grafting - two case reports

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 208
Author(s):  
G.Q.B. Brancher ◽  
L. Cavalieri-Pereira ◽  
C.J.O. Macedo ◽  
F.A. Andrade ◽  
F.B.N.N. Silva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Le Fort I Osteotomy ◽  
Calvarial Bone ◽  
Le Fort ◽  
Atrophic Maxilla ◽  
Le Fort I

scholarly journals Ridge-split technique applied to atrophic posterior mandible with simultaneous implant placement: Case report

2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 150-156
Author(s):  
박도영 ◽  
한정균 ◽  
Kim,Byung-Ock ◽  
유상준
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Ridge Split ◽  
Split Technique

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Split-crest Technique with SimultaneousImplant Placement in Atrophic Edentulous Maxillary and Mandibular Bone: A 5-Year Follow-up Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 31-37
Author(s):  
HoussamAbou Hamdan ◽  
Georges Aoun ◽  
Jean Nassar ◽  
Talal H. Salame
Keyword(s):  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Intraoperative Complications ◽  
Autogenous Bone ◽  
Alveolar Ridge ◽  
Effective Technique ◽  
Noninvasive Technique ◽  
Mandibular Bone ◽  
Ridge Split ◽  
Split Technique

Aim: To evaluate the behavior of the alveolar ridge split technique in a series of surgical cases. Materials and Methods:  One hundred and fifty implants were included in this study for a total of 60 patients. The surgeries consisted of a mid-crestal incision and subsequent bone management with a piezoelectric system. The implants were placed after the alveolar bone was expanded by about 3mm and present bony defects were filled by a mixture of 50% autogenous bone and a xenograft (Bio-Oss®). Bone fracture of the buccal alveolar plate occurred in 8 cases, and those were stabilized with osteosynthesis screws. Implants were simultaneously placed in 140 cases, out of them 4 failures occurred due to membrane exposition. Results: The osseointegration success was estimated to be 97.5%. Conclusion: This study concluded that the bone splitting/expansion seem to be a reliable, predictable, relatively noninvasive technique with limited intraoperative complications. Clinical significance: The study revealed that the alveolar ridge split can be used as an effective technique for atrophic edentulous maxillary and mandibular bone

Rehabilitation of the Atrophic Maxilla With Tilted Implants: Review of the Literature

2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 625-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Peñarrocha-Oltra ◽  
Eugenia Candel-Martí ◽  
Javier Ata-Ali ◽  
María Peñarrocha-Diago
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
High Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Atrophic Maxilla ◽  
Clinical Series ◽  
Implant Loading

We review the evidence-based literature on the use of tilted implants in the rehabilitation of patients with maxillary atrophy. Studies from 1999 to 2010 on patients with atrophic maxilla rehabilitated with tilted implants were reviewed. Clinical series with at least 10 patients rehabilitated using tilted implants and a follow-up of at least 12 months after prosthetic load were included. Case reports and studies with missing data were excluded. In each study the following was assessed: surgical technique, prosthesis type, timing of implant loading, success rate and marginal bone loss of tilted and axial implants, complications and patient satisfaction level. Thirteen studies were included, reporting a total of 782 tilted and 666 axial implants in 319 patients. Success rates went from 91.3% to 100% for axial implants and from 92.1% to 100% for tilted implants; radiographic marginal bone loss went from 0.4 mm to 0.92 mm in tilted implants and from 0.35 mm to 1.21 mm in axial implants. No statistically significant differences were found in any of the studies. No surgical complications and only minor prosthetic complications were reported. High patient satisfaction was found with all types of prosthesis (full-arch fixed, partial fixed and overdentures) placed over tilted implants. The literature on tilted implants shows that implants placed with this technique, both used alone and combined with axially placed implants, and rehabilitated with different prosthetic options have high success rates, minimal complications and high patient satisfaction. However, lack of homogeneity among studies and relatively short follow-up periods for most studies make necessary more studies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document