scholarly journals Feasibility of a Mobile Phone App and Telephone Coaching Survivorship Care Planning Program Among Spanish-Speaking Breast Cancer Survivors (Preprint)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna María Nápoles ◽  
Jasmine Santoyo-Olsson ◽  
Liliana Chacón ◽  
Anita L Stewart ◽  
Niharika Dixit ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Spanish-speaking Latina breast cancer survivors experience disparities in knowledge of breast cancer survivorship care, psychosocial health, lifestyle risk factors, and symptoms compared with their white counterparts. Survivorship care planning programs (SCPPs) could help these women receive optimal follow-up care and manage their condition. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a culturally and linguistically suitable SCPP called the Nuevo Amanecer (New Dawn) Survivorship Care Planning Program for Spanish-speaking breast cancer patients in public hospital settings, approaching the end of active treatment. METHODS The 2-month intervention was delivered via a written bilingual survivorship care plan and booklet, Spanish-language mobile phone app with integrated activity tracker, and telephone coaching. This single-arm feasibility study used mixed methods to evaluate the intervention. Acceptability and feasibility were examined via tracking of implementation processes, debriefing interviews, and postintervention satisfaction surveys. Preliminary efficacy was assessed via baseline and 2-month interviews using structured surveys and pre- and postintervention average daily steps count based on activity tracker data. Primary outcomes were self-reported fatigue, health distress, knowledge of cancer survivorship care, and self-efficacy for managing cancer follow-up health care and self-care. Secondary outcomes were emotional well-being, depressive and somatic symptoms, and average daily steps. RESULTS All women (n=23) were foreign-born with limited English proficiency; 13 (57%) had an elementary school education or less, 16 (70%) were of Mexican origin, and all had public health insurance. Coaching calls lasted on average 15 min each (SD 3.4). A total of 19 of 23 participants (83%) completed all 5 coaching calls. The majority (n=17; 81%) rated the overall quality of the app as “very good” or “excellent” (all rated it as at least “good”). Women checked their daily steps graph on the app between 4.2 to 5.9 times per week. Compared with baseline, postintervention fatigue (B=–.26; P=.02; Cohen d=0.4) and health distress levels (B=–.36; P=.01; Cohen d=0.3) were significantly lower and knowledge of recommended follow-up care and resources (B=.41; P=.03; Cohen d=0.5) and emotional well-being improved significantly (B=1.42; P=.02; Cohen d=0.3); self-efficacy for managing cancer follow-up care did not change. Average daily steps increased significantly from 6157 to 7469 (B=1311.8; P=.02; Cohen d=0.5). CONCLUSIONS We found preliminary evidence of program feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy, with significant 2-month improvements in fatigue, health distress, and emotional well-being and increased knowledge of recommended follow-up care and average daily steps. Tailored mobile phone and health coaching SCPPs could help to ensure equitable access to these services and improve symptoms and physical activity levels among Spanish-speaking Latina breast cancer survivors.

JMIR Cancer ◽  
10.2196/13543 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. e13543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna María Nápoles ◽  
Jasmine Santoyo-Olsson ◽  
Liliana Chacón ◽  
Anita L Stewart ◽  
Niharika Dixit ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 110-110
Author(s):  
Kelly Westbrook Mitchell ◽  
Kevin Houck ◽  
Gretchen Genevieve Kimmick ◽  
Kathy J. Trotter ◽  
Jeffrey M. Peppercorn

110 Background: The optimal method for delivery of care to over 2 million breast cancer survivors in the U.S. remains unclear, with multiple models currently in practice. This study involved a patient-centered investigation of experiences and preferences for breast cancer survivorship care. Methods: We conducted a single-institution, cross-sectional, self-administered survey of needs, experiences, and interests following initial breast cancer care at an academic multidisciplinary breast clinic. For 4 weeks, all patients presenting for routine oncology care were provided a survey at appointment check-in. Analysis is descriptive, with chi square testing used to evaluate demographic correlates of response. Results: 612 surveys were distributed, with a response rate of 66.8%. Median age of respondents was 56 (range 26-93); 71% were white, and 18% identified themselves as black. Over 55% had a college degree. Regarding ongoing care, 63% preferred to see a cancer specialist at least annually, and 30% wanted access to a cancer specialist as needed. Less than 15% preferred referral to a local practice, and less than 15% favored follow-up care from a specialized cancer survivorship clinic. Regarding visit content, over 90% felt assessment for disease recurrence was a priority on follow-up. A majority were interested in emotional and psychological support (52%). Nearly 40% of patients felt that assistance with non-cancer related health issues was very important in oncology clinic follow-up, but only 25% wanted a cancer specialist to provide general medical care. 42% reported receiving a summary of their cancer treatment. 37% reported receiving awritten plan or list of recommendations regarding care needed as a cancer survivor. White patients were less likely than non-white patients to receive a treatment summary (p < 0.02) or a care plan (p<0.005). Age and education were not correlated with receipt of these materials. Conclusions: Patients’ experiences and preferences regarding long-term management of breast cancer are varied. Many patients desire ongoing follow-up with their primary oncology team. Further evaluation of patients’ goals, needs, and an evidence-based approach to follow-up care is needed to guide optimal program design.


2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-125
Author(s):  
Kimlin Tam Ashing ◽  
Lily Lai ◽  
Eva Meyers ◽  
Mayra Serrano ◽  
Marshalee George

Abstract Objective Cancer and diabetes are two severe chronic illnesses that often co-occur. In cancer patients, diabetes increases the risk for treatment complexities and mortality. Yet patient-reported outcomes with co-occurring chronic illness are understudied. Design This preliminary study investigated the association of diabetes with breast cancer-related morbidity among underserved Latina breast cancer survivors (BCS). Participants 137 Latina BCS were recruited from the California Cancer Registry and hospitals. Setting and Main Outcome Measure(s): BCS completed a self-administered mailed questionnaire assessing demographic and medical characteristics e.g. Type2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Results 28% Latina BCS reported co-occurring T2DM at twice the general population rate. Diabetes was most prevalent among Latina BCS &gt; 65 years (43%). Latina BCS with diabetes were more likely to report advanced cancer staging at diagnosis (P = 0.036) and more lymphedema symptoms (P = 0.036). Results suggest non-significant but lower general health and greater physical functioning limitations among BCS with T2DM. Conclusions This study has relevance for precision population medicine by (i) consideration of routine diabetes screening in Latina BCS, (ii) underscoring attention to disease co-occurrence in treatment planning and care delivery and (iii) informing follow-up care and survivorship care planning e.g. patient self-management, oncology and primarily care surveillance and specialty care. Our findings can inform providers, survivors and caregivers about the impact of disease co-occurrence that influence clinically and patient responsive care for both initial treatment and long-term follow-up care to address disparities.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20564-e20564
Author(s):  
Joanne L. Lester ◽  
Robin Stout ◽  
Kara Crosthwaite ◽  
Rachel Jones ◽  
Charles L. Shapiro ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 69-69
Author(s):  
Jamie Cairo ◽  
Carol Huibregtse ◽  
Adam Ferry ◽  
James L. Weese

69 Background: Aurora Health Care is comprised of 15 hospitals and 22 oncology clinics. Aurora Cancer Care (ACC), a Commission on Cancer (CoC) accredited program, diagnoses and treats 7,000 adult cancer patients annually, more than any other healthcare system in Wisconsin. The CoC’s Survivorship Standard 3.3 requires accredited cancer programs to provide cancer patients with survivorship counseling and a written care plan. ACC was challenged to develop a consistent model of survivorship care that can work at multiple sites across the system. Methods: Workflow planning and education began at all oncology clinics in fourth quarter of 2014. Thirteen disease specific survivorship care plan templates were built into the EMR with some-auto population functionality. A system wide delivery plan was launched in first quarter of 2015 with the goal of targeting 10% of eligible patients. Initial focus was on breast cancer patients with some sites also including other cancers. The model of survivorship care is an “embedded consultation” in medical or surgical oncology with an advanced practice provider (APP) completing the care plan and meeting with the patient at the end of first line treatment. Results: Initial required volumes were estimated based on 2013 registry data with a goal of completing approximately 700 care plans in 2015 to meet the 10% CoC standard. During Q1 & Q2 of 2015, 444 care plans were generated and given to patients, mostly for breast cancer survivors. The most significant barrier surrounded retrieving data from the EMR. Conclusions: Data from the first half of 2015 demonstrates success with the approach. Aurora Cancer Care will exceed the benchmark of 700 care plans. There has been a high level of engagement with the APPs who have taken ownership of survivorship care planning, contributing to the success of the program thus far. Because of difficulty retrieving data from the EMR, manual tracking was still required. Future modifications will address this and other barriers.


2021 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edgar González-Hernández ◽  
Daniel Campos ◽  
Rebeca Diego-Pedro ◽  
Rocío Romero ◽  
Rosa Baños ◽  
...  

Abstract The growing body of research on compassion has demonstrated its benefits for healthcare and wellbeing. However, there is no clear agreement about a definition for compassion, given the novelty of the research on this construct and its religious roots. The aim of this study is to analyze the mental semantic construction of compassion in Spanish-speaking women breast cancer survivors, and the effects of the Cognitively-Based Compassion Training (CBCT®) on the modification of this definition, compared to treatment-as-usual (TAU), at baseline, post-intervention, and six-month follow-up. Participants were 56 women breast cancer survivors from a randomized clinical trial. The Osgood’s Semantic Differential categories (evaluative, potency, and activity scales) were adapted to assess the semantic construction of compassion. At baseline, participants had an undefined idea about compassion. The CBCT influenced subjects’ semantic construction of what it means to be compassionate. Findings could lead to future investigations and compassion programs that adapt to a specific culture or population.


2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Singh-Carlson ◽  
F. Wong ◽  
G. Oshan

Background This paper focuses on phase iii of a study evaluating the development and implementation of a survivorship care plan (scp) that could ultimately improve post-treatment quality of life for South Asian (sa) breast cancer survivors (bcss). Evaluating the utility of the scp was important to understand how sociocultural influences might affect uptake of the scp by sa bcss, especially as they transition from treatment to community care.Methods Post-treatment discharge planning using an individualized scp at discharge for sa female breast cancer patients with stage i or ii disease was offered as a pilot service to oncologists at BC Cancer’s Fraser Valley and Abbotsford centres. A longitudinal study using a mixed-methods approach was used to evaluate the utility of that service at 1 year after discharge.Results Participants (n = 16) completed a survey about their scp delivery experience, and a 1-year post implementation survey about the scp content and its utility. Most participants reported the discharge appointments to be extremely or very helpful with respect to post-treatment care questions. All have visited their family physicians for follow-up as recommended. The three major sources of support were family, faith, and family physician. Qualitative responses from the health care professionals who developed or implemented the scps identified two challenges in scp delivery: engaging patients or family members in relationship, and translating key information through interpreters.Conclusions It is important to evaluate the utility of scps for sa female survivors, who might differ from the general bcs population because of a different understanding of the disease; language barriers; strong influence of family members; societal stigmas; and personal, social, cultural, and religious beliefs and values. A formal nurse-led discharge appointment with discussions about follow-up care and an individualized scp outlining the short- and long-term effects of treatment are recommended. Particular attention has to be paid to the practical and psychosocial needs of sa bcss and their supporting family members.


10.2196/23414 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. e23414
Author(s):  
Akshat Kapoor ◽  
Priya Nambisan

Background Breast cancer is the most common form of cancer among American women, accounting for 23% of all cancer survivors nationally. Yet, the availability of adequate resources and tools for supporting breast cancer survivors has not kept up with the rapid advancement in treatment options, resulting in unmet supportive care needs, particularly among low-income and minority populations. This study explores an alternative means of delivering breast cancer survivorship care plans (SCPs), with the aim of improving survivor morbidity, patient knowledge, and self-management of treatment-related symptoms, as well as addressing inconsistencies in follow-up care visits. Objective The overall goal of this study is to improve the uptake of SCP recommendations via an educational intervention for breast cancer survivors, to improve treatment-related morbidity, patient knowledge, self-management, and adherence to follow-up visits. The specific aims of the study are to (1) evaluate the feasibility of the online SCP, and (2) assess the impact of the online SCP on survivorship outcomes. Methods We will enroll 50 breast cancer survivors who have completed initial breast cancer treatment into a 2-armed, randomized, waitlist-controlled pilot trial, and collect data at baseline and 6 months. For the first aim, we will use mixed methods, including surveys and personal interviews among the intervention group, to determine the feasibility of providing an online, interactive SCP (called ACESO) based on the survivors’ online user experience and their short-term adoption. For the secondary aim, we will compare the 2 groups to assess the primary outcomes of survivor knowledge, self-efficacy for self-management, perceived peer support, and adherence to SCP-recommended posttreatment follow-up visits to oncology and primary care; and the secondary outcomes of treatment-related morbidity (body weight, fatigue, depression, anxiety, sexual function, distress, and sleep quality). We assess these outcomes by using measurements from validated instruments with robust psychometric properties. Results We have developed and refined the online breast cancer survivorship plan, ACESO, with consultation from breast cancer oncologists, nurses, and survivors. Approval for the study protocol has been obtained from the Institutional Review Board. An advisory board has also been established to provide oversight and recommendations on the conduct of the study. The study will be completed over a period of 2 years. Conclusions The results of this pilot study will inform the feasibility and design of a larger-scale pragmatic trial to evaluate the impact of an online breast cancer SCP on treatment-related morbidity and self-efficacy for self-management. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/23414


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document