scholarly journals Authors’ Response to Peer Reviews of “Impact of COVID-19 Testing Strategies and Lockdowns on Disease Management Across Europe, South America, and the United States: Analysis Using Skew-Normal Distributions” (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano De Leo
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Disease Management ◽  
South America ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
The United States ◽  
Normal Distributions ◽  
Peer Reviews ◽  
Testing Strategies ◽  
Skew Normal Distributions ◽  
Skew Normal

UNSTRUCTURED This is author responses to peer review.

scholarly journals The Validity of Online Patient Ratings of Physicians: Analysis of Physician Peer Reviews and Patient Ratings (Preprint)

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J McGrath ◽  
Jennifer Lewis Priestley ◽  
Yiyun Zhou ◽  
Patrick J Culligan
Keyword(s):  
Internal Medicine ◽  
United States ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Family Medicine ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
The United States ◽  
Medical Specialization ◽  
Peer Reviews ◽  
Selection Of

BACKGROUND Information from ratings sites are increasingly informing patient decisions related to health care and the selection of physicians. OBJECTIVE The current study sought to determine the validity of online patient ratings of physicians through comparison with physician peer review. METHODS We extracted 223,715 reviews of 41,104 physicians from 10 of the largest cities in the United States, including 1142 physicians listed as “America’s Top Doctors” through physician peer review. Differences in mean online patient ratings were tested for physicians who were listed and those who were not. RESULTS Overall, no differences were found between the online patient ratings based upon physician peer review status. However, statistical differences were found for four specialties (family medicine, allergists, internal medicine, and pediatrics), with online patient ratings significantly higher for those physicians listed as a peer-reviewed “Top Doctor” versus those who were not. CONCLUSIONS The results of this large-scale study indicate that while online patient ratings are consistent with physician peer review for four nonsurgical, primarily in-office specializations, patient ratings were not consistent with physician peer review for specializations like anesthesiology. This result indicates that the validity of patient ratings varies by medical specialization.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document