scholarly journals Understanding the Impact of Childhood Sexual Abuse on Men�s Risk Behavior: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Study (Preprint)

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin J Downing Jr ◽  
Dominique Brown ◽  
Jeffrey Steen ◽  
Ellen Benoit

BACKGROUND Childhood sexual abuse (CSA) remains a critical public health issue among black and Latino men who have sex with men (MSM), as it is associated with multiple negative outcomes including substance misuse, poor mental health, revictimization, and high-risk sexual behavior. Most CSA research with MSM relies on quantitative assessment that often precludes consideration of cultural variations in how formative sexual experiences are understood and is based on inconsistent or overly restrictive definitions of abuse, and therefore may fail to detect certain abusive experiences (eg, those involving female perpetrators), which can have harmful health consequences if they remain unrecognized. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to overcome existing limitations in the literature by drawing on perspectives of black and Latino MSM and men who have sex with men and women (MSMW), as well as relevant service providers to better understand the role of, and the need to include, sexual abuse histories (eg, CSA) in treatment and counseling settings, with the long-term goal of improving assessment and health outcomes. METHODS We will conduct mixed-methods interviews, framed by an intersectionality approach, with 80 black and Latino men (40 MSM and 40 MSMW) in New York City (NYC), exploring appraisals of their formative sexual experiences, including those described as consensual but meeting criteria for CSA. We will also interview 30 local service providers representing substance abuse treatment, mental health care, and HIV prevention and outreach. RESULTS The study was launched in May 2017. CONCLUSIONS This formative research will inform testable approaches to assessing and incorporating sexual abuse history into substance abuse treatment and other health and mental health services used by men with such histories.

2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 411-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cullen C. Merritt

The question “What makes an organization public?” is a leading point of scholarly inquiry in the field of public administration. This study supplements existing theory on publicness by further exploring the primary influences on an organization’s publicness—influences identified by analyzing data from in-depth interviews with senior-level managers of mental health and substance abuse treatment facilities. Results from a grounded theoretical analysis of these managers’ perceptions provide support for a conceptual framework of organizational publicness in which political authority, horizontal engagement, and public engagement are associated with higher levels of publicness. Better understanding of the prism through which senior managers conceptualize publicness may enhance managerial awareness of the most salient structural and institutional mechanisms that empower treatment facilities to effectively support individuals suffering from mental health disorders such as substance abuse, emotional distress, and depression.


2011 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristine L. Rae Olmsted ◽  
Janice M. Brown ◽  
J. Russ Vandermaas-Peeler ◽  
Stephen J. Tueller ◽  
Ruby E. Johnson ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 45 (12) ◽  
pp. 1201-1205
Author(s):  
Deborah W. Garnick ◽  
Ann M. Hendricks ◽  
Constance Horgan ◽  
Jane D. Duiski ◽  
Kenneth E. Thorpe

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document