scholarly journals CT-guided percutaneous biopsy of sclerotic bone lesions: diagnostic yield and accuracy.

1999 ◽  
Vol 172 (5) ◽  
pp. 1389-1392 ◽  
Author(s):  
S G Leffler ◽  
F S Chew
2017 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 661-669 ◽  
Author(s):  
I-Yuan Joseph Chang ◽  
Hakan Ilaslan ◽  
Murali Sundaram ◽  
Jean Schils ◽  
Naveen Subhas

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. 53-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Ní Mhuircheartaigh ◽  
Colm McMahon ◽  
Yu-Ching Lin ◽  
Jim Wu

Diagnostics ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 168
Author(s):  
Paolo Spinnato ◽  
Eugenio Rimondi ◽  
Giancarlo Facchini

The craniovertebral junction defined as the occiput, the atlas, and the axis is a complex bony region that contains vital neural and vascular structures. We report the experience of a single academic institution regarding CT-guided biopsy of this skeletal region. We reviewed all of the CT-guided biopsies performed in our department, completed in the craniovertebral junction. We collected data in regard to biopsy procedures, patients’ vital statistics, and histopathological diagnosis. In total, 16 patients (8M and 8F; mean age 52; range 16–86 years old) were included in this series. In eight patients, the lesions were located in the atlas vertebra (8/16—50%), in six patients in the axis (37.5%), and in two patients in the occiput (12.5%). No complications were observed during or after the procedures. All of the procedures were technically successful. The biopsy was diagnostic in 13/16 patients (81.3%): four metastatic lesions (25%—three breast and one prostate cancers), four multiple myeloma bone lesions (25%), three aneurismal bone cysts (18.8%), one aggressive hemangioma (6.3%), and one pseudogout (6.3%). Moreover, in two-thirds (66.6%) of non-diagnostic histological reports, malignancies were excluded. CT-guided percutaneous biopsy is a safe tool and allows obtaining a histological diagnosis, in most cases, even in the most delicate site of the human skeleton—the craniovertebral junction.


Author(s):  
Sebastian Zensen ◽  
Sumitha Selvaretnam ◽  
Marcel Opitz ◽  
Denise Bos ◽  
Johannes Haubold ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Apart from the commonly applied manual needle biopsy, CT-guided percutaneous biopsies of bone lesions can be performed with battery-powered drill biopsy systems. Due to assumably different radiation doses and procedural durations, the aim of this study is to examine radiation exposure and establish local diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) of CT-guided bone biopsies of different anatomical regions. Methods In this retrospective study, dose data of 187 patients who underwent CT-guided bone biopsy with a manual or powered drill biopsy system performed at one of three different multi-slice CT were analyzed. Between January 2012 and November 2019, a total of 27 femur (A), 74 ilium (B), 27 sacrum (C), 28 thoracic vertebrae (D) and 31 lumbar vertebrae (E) biopsies were included. Radiation exposure was reported for volume-weighted CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose–length product (DLP). Results CTDIvol and DLP of manual versus powered drill biopsy were (median, IQR): A: 56.9(41.4–128.5)/66.7(37.6–76.2)mGy, 410(203–683)/303(128–403)mGy·cm, B: 83.5(62.1–128.5)/59.4(46.2–79.8)mGy, 489(322–472)/400(329–695)mGy·cm, C: 97.5(71.6–149.2)/63.1(49.1–83.7)mGy, 627(496–740)/404(316–515)mGy·cm, D: 67.0(40.3–86.6)/39.7(29.9–89.0)mGy, 392(267–596)/207(166–402)mGy·cm and E: 100.1(66.5–162.6)/62.5(48.0–90.0)mGy, 521(385–619)/315(240–452)mGy·cm. Radiation exposure with powered drill was significantly lower for ilium and sacrum, while procedural duration was not increased for any anatomical location. Local DRLs could be depicted as follows (CTDIvol/DLP): A: 91 mGy/522 mGy·cm, B: 90 mGy/530 mGy·cm, C: 116 mGy/740 mGy·cm, D: 87 mGy/578 mGy·cm and E: 115 mGy/546 mGy·cm. The diagnostic yield was 82.4% for manual and 89.4% for powered drill biopsies. Conclusion Use of powered drill bone biopsy systems for CT-guided percutaneous bone biopsies can significantly reduce the radiation burden compared to manual biopsy for specific anatomical locations such as ilium and sacrum and does not increase radiation dose or procedural duration for any of the investigated locations. Level of Evidence Level 3.


2014 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 39
Author(s):  
Se Kyoung Park ◽  
In Sook Lee ◽  
Kil Ho Cho ◽  
Jae Hyuck Yi ◽  
Sung Moon Lee ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 66 (781) ◽  
pp. 77-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
K C Yee ◽  
C Y Tan ◽  
K B Bhatt ◽  
A M Davies

Radiology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 254 (3) ◽  
pp. 851-857 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nilo A. Avila ◽  
Andrew J. Dwyer ◽  
Antoinette Rabel ◽  
Thomas Darling ◽  
Chien-Hui Hong ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document