Сardiopulmonary and Cerebral Resuscitation:New European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2015

2016 ◽  
Vol 0 (4.75) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
L.V. Usenko ◽  
O.V. Tsariov ◽  
Yu.Yu. Kobeliatskyi
Author(s):  
Federico Semeraro ◽  
Robert Greif ◽  
Bernd W Böttiger ◽  
Roman Burkart ◽  
Diana Cimpoesu ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Spyros D. Mentzelopoulos ◽  
Keith Couper ◽  
Patrick Van de Voorde ◽  
Patrick Druwé ◽  
Marieke Blom ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jasmeet Soar ◽  
Bernd W. Böttiger ◽  
Pierre Carli ◽  
Keith Couper ◽  
Charles D. Deakin ◽  
...  

Resuscitation ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 67 ◽  
pp. S87-S96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans-Richard Arntz ◽  
Leo Bossaert ◽  
Gerasimos S. Filippatos

2002 ◽  
Vol 118 (12) ◽  
pp. 463-471
Author(s):  
Francisco de Latorre ◽  
Jerry Nolan ◽  
Colin Robertson ◽  
Douglas Chamberlain ◽  
Peter Baskett

Resuscitation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 95 ◽  
pp. 249-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Wyllie ◽  
Jos Bruinenberg ◽  
Charles Christoph Roehr ◽  
Mario Rüdiger ◽  
Daniele Trevisanuto ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 140 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dung T Nguyen ◽  
Kasper G Lauridsen ◽  
Josephine Johnsen ◽  
Kristian Krogh ◽  
Bo Løfgren

Background: The European Resuscitation Council (ERC) 2015 basic life support (BLS) guidelines introduced a simplified algorithm compared to the ERC 2010 BLS guidelines. This was intended to improve adherence to guidelines and retention of skills. This study aimed to compare the retention of BLS skills 3 months after training using the ERC 2010 or 2015 guidelines. Methods: This was an observational study including video recordings of laypersons being skill tested 3 months after participation in a standardized ERC BLS/AED course using either the ERC 2010 guidelines or the simplified ERC 2015 guidelines. The endpoints were 1) remembering the correct sequence of BLS/AED algorithm, 2) remembering the correct sequence of the BLS/AED algorithm and performing all skills correctly, 3) time to: emergency medical service (EMS) call, first compression, and shock delivery. Results: We analyzed videos of 133 laypersons skill tested 3 months after initial training; 64 trained using the 2010 guidelines (mean ±standard deviation (SD) age: 40 ±11 years, male sex: 19 (30%)) and 69 trained using the 2015 guidelines (age: 44 ±10 years, male sex: 36 (52%)). Participants in the 2015 guidelines group improved the retention of the BLS/AED algorithm compared to the 2010 guidelines group (29 (42%) vs. 10 (16%), relative risk (RR): 2.7 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.4 - 5.1) P=0.001). Both BLS/AED algorithm and all skills were correctly performed by 13 (19%) vs. 3 (5%) (RR: 4.0 (95% CI: 1.2 - 13.5) P=0.01) in the 2015 and 2010 groups respectively. No significant difference was found in time to EMS call (difference: 3 sec (95% CI: -2 - 9 sec) P=0.27), time to first compression (difference: 4 sec, (95% CI: -3 - 10 sec) P=0.28), and time to first shock (difference: 4 sec (95% CI: -5 - 14 sec) P=0.33) between the groups. Conclusion: BLS/AED training using ERC 2015 guidelines was associated with better skill retention compared to training using ERC 2010 guidelines. There was no difference in time to EMS call, first compression, or shock delivery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document